Skip to content

EMPHASYS 4710-54-300Recalls & reported problems

Depuy (Ireland) · EMPHASYS ACETABULAR SHELL THREE-HOLE 54MM CEMENTLESS · Class 2 · Implant

Adverse event reports
14
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
12
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 14 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10603295500612), received between Jun 30, 2023 and Sep 2, 2026 — classified as 12 injuries, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Use of Device Problem” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 1 reportsFeb 2024: 1 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 1 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 1 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 1 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 1 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 1 reportsJan 2026: 1 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 1 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 1 reportsJul 2026: 1 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 1 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem8
  • Use of Device Problem2
  • Device-Device Incompatibility1
  • Fracture1
  • Manufacturing, Packaging or Shipping Problem1
  • Migration1
  • Osseointegration Problem1

Patient problems

  • Unspecified Infection7
  • Joint Laxity3
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • Unspecified Musculoskeletal problem2
  • Inadequate Osseointegration1
  • Insufficient Information1
  • Osteolysis1
  • Pain1

Recent adverse event reports

The 14 most recent of 14 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjurySep 2, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 50575601 ↗
  • InjuryJul 7, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT HEAD AND LINER REVISED DUE TO INFECTION. DOI: (B)(6) 2026. DOR: (B)(6) 2026. AFFECTED SIDE: LEFT HIP.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 25736740 ↗
  • InjuryJun 19, 2026Migration

    IT WAS REPORTED THE PATIENT CUP WAS LOOSE AND MIGRATED. THE CUP WAS REVISED TO A BIGGER SIZE AND SCREWS.

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 25563365 ↗
  • InjuryApr 27, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT KEPT DISLOCATING DUE TO POSSIBLE IMPINGEMENT COMBINED WITH PATIENT PUSHING HER RANGE OF MOTION TOO SOON AFTER SURGERY AND WASN'T FULLY HEALED BEFORE RESUMING REGULAR PHYSICAL ACTIVITY. SURGEON PUT IN COMPETITOR'S CUP AND SWITCHED OUT HEAD TO MATCH. DOI: (B)(6) 2026, DOR: (B)(6) 2026, AFFECTED SIDE: UNKNOWN HIP.

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 25003401 ↗
  • InjuryJan 5, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT WAS SEPTIC. DURING AN ATTEMPTED IRRIGATION AND DEBRIDEMENT, THE INFECTION WAS FOUND TO BE WORSE THAN ANTICIPATED, LEADING TO THE REMOVAL OF ALL IMPLANTS AND PLACEMENT OF ABX (ANTIBIOTIC) SPACER BLOCKS FOR A PLANNED STAGED REVISION. ALL DEVICES WERE EXPLANTED WITHOUT DIFFICULTY. AFTER IMPLANTATION AND REDUCTION OF THE ANTIBIOTIC SPACER, THE PATIENT WAS CODED. DOI: (B)(6), 2025 DOR: UNKNOWN AFFECTED SIDE: UNKNOWN.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 23966495 ↗
  • InjuryDec 31, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THAYER SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING AT DARTMOUTH FIRST REPORT OF RETRIEVALS FOR STATEMENT OF WORK FOR Q4 OF 2025. DARTMOUTH IS THE RESEARCH LOCATION, AND NOT THE FACILITY OF PLACEMENT. A DEPUY SYNTHES IMPLANT WAS REVISED AND REVIEWED FOR ANALYSIS. REASON FOR REVISION: REVISION FOR INFECTION AND PAIN. THE ARTICULAR SURFACE OF THE CERAMIC FEMORAL HEAD SHOWS MINOR METAL TRANSFER.

    Patient problems: Pain; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 23933708 ↗
  • InjuryOct 22, 2025Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO LOOSENING OF CUP AT NON-CEMENTED INTERFACE. CEMENT MANUFACTURE WAS UNKNOWN. AFFECTED SIDE: LET HIP.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 23356982 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 30, 2025Manufacturing, Packaging or Shipping Problem; Manufacturing, Packaging or Shipping Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE IMPLANT IN THE BOX WAS A 48MM CUP AND THE BOX WAS LABELED AS 54MM CUP. A SECOND 54MM CUP WAS ON HAND SO THERE WAS NO DEVIATIONS TO THE PROCEDURE OR CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. NO SURGICAL DELAY WAS REPORTED. AFFECTED SIZE: UNKNOWN HIP.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21934129 ↗
  • InjuryNov 5, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    PATIENT UNDERWENT REVISION HIP SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2024. PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO INFECTION. SURGEON REMOVED AND IMPLANTED A PROSTALAC. DOI: (B)(6) 2024, DOR: (B)(6) 2024, AFFECTED SIDE: RIGHT HIP.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 20612331 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 21, 2024Fracture; Device-Device Incompatibility; Fracture; Device-Device Incompatibility

    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED: NO HARMFUL EVENT TO REPORT TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19358948 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 5, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    SUBJECT ID: (B)(6); STUDY NO: DOTS. CLINICAL NOTIFICATION RECEIVED FOR REVISION DUE TO PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURE. DATE OF IMPLANT: (B)(6) 2023; DATE OF REVISION: (B)(6) 2024; (LEFT HIP). TREATMENT: STEM AND HEAD WERE REVISED. MEDICAL RECORDS REVIEW (22_JAN_2024_08_09_04_18105): ON (B)(6) 2024, PATIENTS LEFT TOTAL HIP WAS REVISED TO ADDRESS CHRONIC INFECTION WITH PROGRESSION OF PERIPROSTHETIC OSTEOLYSIS OF BOTH FEMORAL AND ACETABULAR BONE. DURING THE REVISION SURGICAL PROCEDURE, IT WAS IDENTIFIED THAT THE FEMORAL STEM WAS LOOSE, THAT IT HAD ONLY A FIBROUS INGROWTH. THERE WAS AN OSTEOLYTIC DEFECT BENEATH THE SUPERIOR ASPECT OF THE ACETABULAR CUP, BUT THE CUP WAS WELL-FIXED. THERE WAS OSTEOLYSIS OF THE FEMORAL CANAL. THE STEM, FEMORAL HEAD, CUP, LINER AND TWO ACETABULAR SCREWS WERE ALL EXPLANTED. A TEMPORARY ANTIBIOTIC SPACER, MADE UP OF AN ANTIBIOTIC CEMENTED DEPUY SUMMIT STEM, WAS CEMENTED IN PLACE ALONG WITH STIMULANT PELLETS, AND PAIRED WITH A BIPOLAR HEAD. TWO SYNTHES CERCLAGE CABLES WERE PLACED ON THE PROXIMAL FEMUR TO ADDRESS A CALCAR FRACTURE THAT OCCURRED INTRAOPERATIVELY DURING BROACHING FOR THE SPACER SUMMIT STEM. THE PATIENT TOLERATED THE PROCEDURE WELL, WITH NO OTHER COMPLI

    Patient problems: Osteolysis; Unspecified Infection; Unspecified Musculoskeletal problem

    MAUDE report 18641169 ↗
  • InjuryJan 3, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO INFECTION. UNKNOWN SURGICAL DELAY. DOI: (B)(6) 2023. DOR: (B)(6) 2023. AFFECTED SIDE: LEFT HIP.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 18435580 ↗
  • InjuryJul 17, 2023Use of Device Problem; Use of Device Problem

    CLINICAL NOTIFICATION RECEIVED FOR REVISION DUE TO RECURRENT DISLOCATIONS. DATE OF IMPLANT: ON (B)(6) 2023, DATE OF REVISION: ON (B)(6) 2023, (LEFT HIP). TREATMENT: HEAD, LINER, AND CUP WERE REVISED. WERE DEPUY COMPONENTS REMOVED: YES.

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity; Unspecified Musculoskeletal problem

    MAUDE report 17333931 ↗
  • InjuryJun 30, 2023Use of Device Problem; Use of Device Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT RECEIVED AN EMPHASYS CUP AND STEM CONSTRUCT ON (B)(6) 23. IT WAS THEORIZED BY SURGEON THAT THE PLACEMENT OF THE CUP IS TOO MUCH ANTERVERSION AND NOT ENOUGH INCLINATION. THE PATIENT HAD SEVERAL ANTERIOR DISLOCATIONS FOLLOWING SURGERY. THERE WAS NO LOOSENING OF ANY COMPONENTS ON THE CUP OR STEM SIDE. DOI: (B)(6) 2023. DOR: (B)(6) 2023. AFFECTED SIDE: LEFT HIP.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 17241084 ↗

Other PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED devices

All PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.