Skip to content

EMPHASYS 4710-48-000Recalls & reported problems

Depuy (Ireland) · EMPHASYS ACETABULAR SHELL NO-HOLE 48MM · Class 2 · Implant

All models of EMPHASYS (109)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
4
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10603295503040), received between Jan 27, 2026 and Jun 10, 2026 — classified as 4 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Use of Device Problem” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 2 reportsFeb 2026: 1 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 1 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
  • Use of Device Problem1

Patient problems

  • Physical Asymmetry2
  • Insufficient Information1
  • Pain1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJun 10, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO PAIN. AFFECTED SIDE-RIGHT HIP.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 25457133 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 24, 2026Use of Device Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT COMES BACK IN AFTER DISLOCATING. THE DOCTOR FOUND IT BEST TO REMOVE THE CUP AND CHANGE THE POSITION OF IT. HE WENT WITH AN EDM CONSTRUCT FOR ADDED STABILITY AS WELL. NO FURTHER PATIENT INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 24425666 ↗
  • InjuryJan 27, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT EMPHASYS 3-HOLE CUP, DM METAL LINER, 48X36 DM LINER, AND 28 HEAD WERE EXPLANTED IN ORDER TO REVISE DUE TO THE PATIENT LEG LENGTH BEING TOO LONG NO OTHER INFORMATION AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME. DOI: UNKNOWN. DOR: (B)(6) 2026. AFFECTED SIDE: RIGHT HIP.

    Patient problems: Physical Asymmetry

    MAUDE report 24191310 ↗
  • InjuryJan 27, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT EMPHASYS 3-HOLE CUP, DM METAL LINER, 48X36 DM LINER, AND 28 HEAD WERE EXPLANTED IN ORDER TO REVISE DUE TO THE PATIENT LEG LENGTH BEING TOO LONG NO OTHER INFORMATION AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME. DOI: UNKNOWN, DOR: (B)(6) 2026, AFFECTED SIDE: RIGHT HIP.

    Patient problems: Physical Asymmetry

    MAUDE report 24191109 ↗

Other Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented devices

All Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page