EMPHASYS 4742-05-200Recalls & reported problems
Depuy (Ireland) · EMPHASYS 12/14 FEMORAL STEM COLLARED HIGH OFFSET HA COATED 5 HO · Class 2 · Implant
All models of EMPHASYS (109)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 5
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10603295505358), received between Sep 15, 2022 and Dec 5, 2024 — classified as 5 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Osseointegration Problem” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem5
- Osseointegration Problem1
Patient problems
- Limb Fracture2
- Unspecified Infection2
- Ambulation or Postural Difficulties1
- Discomfort1
- Erythema1
- Fall1
- Inadequate Osseointegration1
- Pain1
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryDec 5, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT PREVIOUSLY IMPLANTED COMPONENTS WERE ALL REMOVED DUE TO AN INFECTION IN THE PATIENT. DOI: (B)(6) 2024, DOR: (B)(6) 2024 , AFFECTED SIDE: UNKNOWN.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 20859339 ↗InjurySep 27, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
MEDICAL RECORDS RECEIVED: ON (B)(6) 2024, THE PATIENT WAS TREATED OPERATIVELY WITH IRRIGATION AND DEBRIDEMENT, AS WELL AS AN EXCISION/REVISION OF THE PREVIOUS SURGICAL SCAR¿THIS WAS ALL PART OF TREATMENT FOR A SUPERFICIAL WOUND INFECTION OF THE LEFT DIRECT ANTERIOR TOTAL HIP WOUND. THE INCISION WAS RED, SWOLLEN, AND TENDER. CULTURES TESTED POSITIVE FOR MRSA. THE INFECTION WAS ENTIRELY SUPERFICIAL WITH NO DEEP COMMUNICATION TRACTS. NO PRODUCTS WERE REVISED. THE PATIENT WAS SEEN CLINICALLY ON (B)(6) 2024 FOR POST-OPERATIVE FOLLOW-UP. HER WOUND WAS HEALING WELL, AND THE RETENTION SUTURES PLACED ON (B)(6) 2024 WERE REMOVED FROM THE OFFICE.
Patient problems: Discomfort; Erythema; Post Operative Wound Infection; Swelling/ Edema; Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 20323428 ↗InjuryJun 27, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
SUBJECT ID: (B)(6). STUDY NO: DOTS. CLINICAL ADVERSE EVENT RECEIVED FOR VASCULAR DVT. EVENT IS SERIOUS AND IS CONSIDERED MODERATE. EVENT IS POSSIBLY RELATED TO PROCEDURE. EVENT IS NOT RELATED TO DEVICE. DATE OF IMPLANT:(B)(6) 2024. DATE OF EVENT: (B)(6) 2024. (LEFT KNEE). TREATMENT: ORAL MEDICATION.
Patient problems: Thrombosis/Thrombus
MAUDE report 19624861 ↗InjuryAug 24, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
CLINICAL ADVERSE EVENT RECEIVED FOR FEMORAL PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURE. EVENT IS NOT SERIOUS AND IS CONSIDERED MILD. EVENT IS POSSIBLY RELATED TO PROCEDURE. EVENT IS NOT RELATED TO DEVICE. DATE OF IMPLANT: (B)(6) 2023. DATE OF EVENT: (B)(6) 2023. (RIGHT HIP). TREATMENT: NONE.
Patient problems: Ambulation or Postural Difficulties; Limb Fracture; Pain
MAUDE report 17611725 ↗InjurySep 15, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Osseointegration Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Osseointegration Problem
CLINICAL NOTIFICATION RECEIVED FOR REVISION DUE TO PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURE. DATE OF IMPLANT: (B)(6) 2022. DATE OF REVISION: (B)(6) 2022. (RIGHT HIP). TREATMENT: REVISION; STEM, HEAD, AND LINER WERE REMOVED.
Patient problems: Fall; Inadequate Osseointegration; Limb Fracture
MAUDE report 15427192 ↗
Other Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, uncemented, metal / polymer, non-porous, calcium phosphate devices
- Novation 130-32-51Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls156 reports
- Novation 130-36-53Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls79 reports
- CORAIL 3L92511Depuy (Ireland) · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, uncemented, metal/polymer, non-porous, calicum-phosphate158 reports
- Acumatch A Series 138-36-29Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate3 recalls1 report
- Novation 136-32-51Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls43 reports
- Novation 130-32-53Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls33 reports
- Novation 132-32-51Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls26 reports
- Novation 136-36-53Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls22 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page