BI-MENTUM ALTRX 122122045Recalls & reported problems
Depuy (Ireland) · BI-MENTUM ALTRX LINER 45/22 · Class 2 · Implant
All models of BI-MENTUM ALTRX (10)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 11
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 10
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 11 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10603295525370), received between Jan 10, 2024 and Sep 11, 2026 — classified as 10 injuries, 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (6 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated6
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
- Difficult to Insert1
- Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method1
- Naturally Worn1
- Off-Label Use1
Patient problems
- Joint Dislocation6
- Insufficient Information2
- Unspecified Infection2
- Fall1
- Fluid Discharge1
Recent adverse event reports
The 11 most recent of 11 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjurySep 11, 2026Naturally Worn
It was reported that patient was revised due to revision poly exchange for excessive poly wear.DOI: UnknownDOR: UnknownAffected side: Left.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 50732546 ↗InjuryMar 3, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT HAD INFECTION. DOCTOR DID WASH OUT AND SWAPPED HEADS. THERE WAS NO DELAY AND NO PROBLEM WITH IMPLANTS. THERE WAS NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. AFFECTED SIDE: UNKNOWN.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 24498343 ↗InjuryJan 20, 2026Device Dislodged or Dislocated
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO CHRONIC DISLOCATION. AFFECTED SIDE: RIGHT HIP.
Patient problems: Joint Dislocation
MAUDE report 24115640 ↗InjurySep 11, 2025Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO DISLOCATION AND CONVERTED TO A CONSTRAINED LINER. AFFECTED SIDE: RIGHT.
Patient problems: Joint Dislocation
MAUDE report 23027268 ↗MalfunctionMay 29, 2025Difficult to Insert; Difficult to Insert
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DUE TO THE DEFECTIVE TOWER USED ON THIS CASE CAUSED THIS LINER TO DROP IN THE FLOOR RESULTING IN A 30 MINUTE DELAY AS THEY HAD TO RUSH TO STORAGE TO GET THE REPLACEMENT IMPLANT TO BE IMPLANTED. DOE: (B)(6) 2025. AFFECTED SIDE: UNKNOWN SIDE.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 22107174 ↗InjuryJan 3, 2025Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO DISLOCATION, CUP WAS TOO RETROVERTED. AFFECTED SIDE: LEFT HIP.
Patient problems: Joint Dislocation
MAUDE report 21067693 ↗InjuryOct 8, 2024Off-Label Use; Off-Label Use
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT WAS PRESENTED WITH DRAINAGE POST THA AFTER BEING DIAGNOSED WITH UNCONTROLLED DIABETES. PATIENT ALSO HAS CIRRHOSIS OF THE LIVER. AN I&D WITH MODULAR COMPONENT EXCHANGE WAS PERFORMED WITHOUT DELAY NOR PATIENT HARM. NO ALLEGATION IS MADE AGAINST ANY COMPONENT. DOI: (B)(6) 2024. DOR: (B)(6) 2024. AFFECTED SIDE: LEFT HIP.
Patient problems: Fluid Discharge
MAUDE report 20400350 ↗InjuryMay 1, 2024Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
PATIENT COMPLAINS OF REPEATED DISLOCATIONS. CUP REVISION PLANNED WITH COMPETITIVE COMPANY. CUP FOUND TO HAVE EXCESSIVE ANTEVERSION ACCORDING TO OPERATING SURGEON. CUP THEN FOUND TO BE LOOSE AT NON-CEMENTED INTERFACE ONCE ATTEMPTING TO USE CUP CUTTER. EXPLANTED SHELL SHOW NO OSTEOINTEGRATION. THERE WAS NO DELAY. DOI: (B)(6) 2023. DOR: (B)(6) 2024. AFFECTED SIDE: LEFT HIP.
Patient problems: Joint Dislocation
MAUDE report 19220924 ↗InjuryMar 27, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT ALL IMPLANTS WERE REMOVED DUE TO INFECTION AND NEW IMPLANTS WERE IMPLANTED. DOI: (B)(6) 2024. DOR: (B)(6) 2024. AFFECTED SIDE : RIGHT HIP.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 18987533 ↗InjuryMar 13, 2024Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT RECEIVED A THA (B)(6) 2024 AFTER A NAIL REMOVAL THAT CUT THROUGH THE FEMORAL HEAD. PATIENT FELL ON (B)(6) AND DISLOCATED HER HIP. THEY WERE NOT ABLE TO REDUCE IN THE ED SO BROUGHT BACK TO OR. APPEARED STEM SUBSIDED FROM FALL AND WAS LOOSE. STEM AND DUAL MOBILITY WAS REVISED TO CEMENTED ENDURANCE STEM AND CONSTRAINED LINER. DOI: (B)(6) 2024; DOR: (B)(6) 2024; AFFECTED SIDE : RIGHT HIP.
Patient problems: Fall; Joint Dislocation
MAUDE report 18893535 ↗InjuryJan 10, 2024Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED A DISLOCATION AND WAS CONVERTED TO A CONSTRAINED LINER UNEVENTFULLY. NO PATIENT HARM OCCURRED AND DELAY WAS EXPERIENCED. DOI: (B)(6) 2023, DOR: (B)(6) 2024, AFFECTED SIDE: LEFT HIP.
Patient problems: Joint Dislocation
MAUDE report 18490227 ↗
Other Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, uncemented, metal / polymer, non-porous, calcium phosphate devices
- Novation 130-32-51Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls156 reports
- Novation 130-36-53Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls79 reports
- CORAIL 3L92511Depuy (Ireland) · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, uncemented, metal/polymer, non-porous, calicum-phosphate158 reports
- Acumatch A Series 138-36-29Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate3 recalls1 report
- Novation 136-32-51Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls43 reports
- Novation 130-32-53Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls33 reports
- Novation 132-32-51Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls26 reports
- Novation 136-36-53Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls22 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page