Skip to content

Halyard 95667Recalls & reported problems

Avanos Medical, Inc. · HALYARD* MIC-KEY* GJ Feeding Tube-18-3.0-45.0-7-10 · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Halyard (232)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 10680651956672), received between Oct 15, 2018 and Oct 15, 2018 — classified as 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break1

Patient problems

  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionOct 15, 2018Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT'S GJ TUBE BROKE INSIDE OF HIM. THE PATIENT WAS SCHEDULED FOR A 3-MONTH ROUTINE TUBE CHANGE. THE GROUP HOME NOTED NO ISSUES WITH THE TUBE. WHEN A WIRE WAS PUT IN AND NO RESISTANCE WAS FELT, IT WAS AT THAT TIME WHEN THEY WERE USING FLUOROSCOPY THAT IT WAS DISCOVERED THE J-TUBE DETACHED FROM THE G-TUBE. THEY WERE ABLE TO LOCATE THE DETACHED PORTION AND REMOVED IT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED ON (B)(6) 2018 STATED THAT THE PATIENT WAS AN OUTPATIENT FROM A GROUP HOME WITH CEREBRAL PALSY. IT WAS NOTED THAT THE PATIENT LEFT IN THE SAME CONDITION THAT HE CAME TO THEM IN, AND EXPERIENCED NO INJURY FROM THE TUBE. ON (B)(6) 2018, THE CUSTOMER FORWARDED AVANOS MEDICAL A COPY OF THE MEDWATCH USER FACILITY REPORT THEY FILED REFERENCE (B)(4): "ON (B)(6) 2018, THE PATIENT HAD A SCHEDULED GASTROJEJUNOSTOMY TUBE PLACEMENT. THE EXCHANGE OF THE 18 FRENCH GASTROJEJUNOSTOMY TUBE WENT AS PLANNED. APPROPRIATE POSITION WAS CONFIRMED WITH CONTRAST INJECTION. RETENTION BALLOON WAS THEN INFLATED. NO COMPLICATIONS WERE NOTED. PATIENT SENT BACK TO GROUP HOME RESIDENCE. THE PATIENT WAS SCHEDULED FOR (B)(6), FOR THE NEXT ROUTINE GASTROJEJUNOSTOMY TUBE REPLACEMENT. THE GROUP HOME

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 7964623 ↗

Other TUBES, GASTROINTESTINAL (AND ACCESSORIES) devices

All TUBES, GASTROINTESTINAL (AND ACCESSORIES) devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page