Coated VICRYL J305HRecalls & reported problems
Ethicon, LLC · Violet Braided (Polyglactin 910), Synthetic Absorbable Suture · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Coated VICRYL (350)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
Quick summary
This Ethicon Coated VICRYL J305H is a violet braided absorbable surgical suture. Most of the 32 reports describe the suture material separating, fraying, or breaking during surgery, and needles detaching from the thread. There are2 reports of patient injury and no deaths. No recalls name this device.
AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.
- Adverse event reports
- 32
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 32 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10705031038639), received between Mar 13, 2018 and Jun 16, 2026 — classified as 2 injuries, 30 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Separation” (20 reports).
3 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K022269); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Material Separation20
- Break7
- Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size2
- Material Frayed2
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Component Misassembled1
- Defective Component1
- Delivered as Unsterile Product1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions26
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient5
- Foreign Body In Patient1
- Unspecified Tissue Injury1
Recent adverse event reports
The 25 most recent of 32 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJun 16, 2026Break; Material Frayed
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. IT WAS REPORTED BY A SALES REP THAT, DURING AN UNKNOWN SURGERY, BOTH SUTURES WERE TANGLED, FRAYED AND EASILY BROKEN. THEY WERE NOT A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. ANOTHER PRODUCT WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25523318 ↗MalfunctionMar 30, 2026Component Misassembled
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2026 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, IT WAS REPORTED BY A SALES REP THAT, DURING AN UNKNOWN SURGERY, IT WAS FOUND THAT THERE HAD BEEN A DOUBLE-ARMED SUTURE THOUGH IT SHOULD BE SINGLE-ARMED. IT WAS NOT A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. ANOTHER PRODUCT WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. NO SAMPLE WILL BE RETURNED. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. FURTHER DETAILS ARE NOT PROVIDED FROM THE HP. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24734599 ↗MalfunctionJan 15, 2026Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A SEMI OPEN FUNDOPLICATION PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2025 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING PEDIATRIC SURGEON'S SUTURING AT THE SWAGE PART AND TYING WITH AN INSTRUMENT, THE SUTURE TIP, WHICH WAS HELD BY THE FORCEPS, WAS BROKEN. IT WAS NOT A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. ANOTHER PRODUCT WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24087564 ↗MalfunctionNov 11, 2025Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING AN UNKNOWN SURGERY, DURING LIGATION, THE SUTURE WAS BROKEN. IT WAS NOT A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. ANOTHER PRODUCT WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. NO SAMPLE WILL BE RETURNED. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23524837 ↗InjuryJun 25, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED ON THE INTESTINAL TRACT. A FATAL ACCIDENT OCCURRED DURING THE CASE THAT THE SUTURE WAS USED. IT IS UNKNOWN IF THE SUTURE IS THE DIRECT CAUSE. IT WAS NOT A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. NO SAMPLE WILL BE RETURNED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: Unspecified Tissue Injury
MAUDE report 22328993 ↗MalfunctionFeb 4, 2025Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE SUTURING PROCESS, THE NEEDLE BROKE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21307953 ↗MalfunctionDec 11, 2024Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING CONTINUOUS SUTURING, THE NEEDLE DETACHED CONTINUOUSLY FROM THE SUTURE. IT WAS NOT A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20903140 ↗MalfunctionDec 11, 2024Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING CONTINUOUS SUTURING, THE NEEDLE DETACHED CONTINUOUSLY FROM THE SUTURE. IT WAS NOT A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20903015 ↗MalfunctionDec 11, 2024Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING CONTINUOUS SUTURING, THE NEEDLE DETACHED CONTINUOUSLY FROM THE SUTURE. IT WAS NOT A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20902964 ↗MalfunctionDec 11, 2024Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING CONTINUOUS SUTURING, THE NEEDLE DETACHED CONTINUOUSLY FROM THE SUTURE. IT WAS NOT A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20902896 ↗MalfunctionNov 26, 2024Material Frayed; Material Frayed
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN SURGERY ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING USE, THE DOCTOR NOTICED THAT THE SUTURE WAS FUZZY AND THE USE WAS STOPPED. IT WAS NOT A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20787848 ↗MalfunctionAug 7, 2024Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN UROLOGICAL PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2024 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE NEEDLE WAS DETACHED. IT WAS NOT A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19932429 ↗MalfunctionApr 24, 2024Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN SURGERY ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. WHEN SUTURING, THE NEEDLE AND SUTURE CAME OFF. IT WAS NOT A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19172510 ↗MalfunctionNov 16, 2023Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. THE SUTURE WAS EASILY DETACHED FROM THE NEEDLE DURING USE. THIS HAPPENED THREE TIMES. THESE WERE NOT CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLES. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18154153 ↗MalfunctionNov 16, 2023Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. THE SUTURE WAS EASILY DETACHED FROM THE NEEDLE DURING USE. THIS HAPPENED THREE TIMES. THESE WERE NOT CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLES. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18153646 ↗MalfunctionNov 16, 2023Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. THE SUTURE WAS EASILY DETACHED FROM THE NEEDLE DURING USE. THIS HAPPENED THREE TIMES. THESE WERE NOT CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLES. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18153568 ↗InjuryNov 16, 2023Break; Material Separation; Break; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A NASAL SEPTUM LENGTHENING PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE DEVICE HIT TISSUE UPON NASAL SEPTUM SUTURE, SO THE SURGEON PULLED THE DEVICE, THEN IT WAS FOUND THAT THE NEEDLE WAS MISSING FROM THE BODY. THE OPERATION TIME WAS EXTENDED FOR 60 MINUTES. THE PATIENT IS UNDERGOING FOLLOW-UP AT HOME. THE NEEDLE REMNANTS ARE ON THE RIGHT AND LEFT SIDES OF THE NASAL SEPTAL DORSUM. WHEN THE SWELLING GOES DOWN, SURGERY WILL BE PERFORMED OR THE NEEDLE WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE NASAL CAVITY. THE PATIENT IS SCHEDULED FOR TREATMENT. ON (B)(6) 2023, THE PATIENT WILL BE EXAMINED AND THE NASAL CAVITY WILL BE DETERMINED BY ENDOSCOPY. THE SURGEON STATED A POSSIBLE CONTRIBUTING FACTOR TO THE EVENT WAS THAT HE "MAY HAVE BITTEN THE NEEDLE NEAR THE SWAGE WHEN I TURNED IT TO A WEAK BEND". ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 18150836 ↗MalfunctionMay 31, 2023Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. THE SUTURE WAS EASILY DETACHED FROM THE NEEDLE DURING SUTURE. IT WAS NOT A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. THIS HAPPENED IN 2 PACKAGES IN A ROW. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17032741 ↗MalfunctionMay 31, 2023Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. THE SUTURE WAS EASILY DETACHED FROM THE NEEDLE DURING SUTURE. IT WAS NOT A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. THIS HAPPENED IN 2 PACKAGES IN A ROW. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17032739 ↗MalfunctionOct 5, 2022Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. THE NEEDLE DETACHED FROM THE SUTURE JUST BY PLACING IT ON THE NEEDLE HOLDER. ANOTHER PACKAGE WAS OPENED BUT THE SAME THING HAPPENED. THESE WERE NOT CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLES. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15543870 ↗MalfunctionOct 5, 2022Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. THE NEEDLE DETACHED FROM THE SUTURE JUST BY PLACING IT ON THE NEEDLE HOLDER. ANOTHER PACKAGE WAS OPENED BUT THE SAME THING HAPPENED. THESE WERE NOT CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLES. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15543863 ↗MalfunctionJul 27, 2022Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A LAPAROSCOPIC GASTRECTOMY PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2022 AND SUTURE WAS USED. THE SUTURE WAS DETACHED FROM THE NEEDLE DURING USE. IT WAS NOT A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15113330 ↗MalfunctionJul 1, 2022Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON 6/7/2022 AND SUTURE WAS USED. THE SUTURE BROKE DURING USE. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 14885402 ↗MalfunctionJan 18, 2022Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE SUTURE DIVIDED. THERE WERE NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13285249 ↗MalfunctionDec 18, 2021Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE NEEDLE AND SUTURE WERE SEPARATED. THERE WERE NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13040159 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under K022269. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-2144-2024 · May 10, 2024 · Open, ClassifiedVICRYL (polyglactin 910) Suture - Indicated for use in general soft tissue approximation and/or ligation, including use in ophthalmic surgery, but not for use in cardiovascular and
- Z-0989-2020 · Jan 3, 2020 · TerminatedCoated VICRYL (Polyglactin 910) Suture, 18" (45cm) Product Code J497H. The device is a synthetic absorbable sterile surgical suture.
- Z-1087-06 · May 4, 2006 · TerminatedCoated Vicryl (polyglactin 910) suture. Needle Type CTXB Suture size: 1. Vicryl suture is a synthetic absorbable sterile surgical suture comprised of a copolymer made from 90% gyc
Other SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID devices
- Coated VICRYL VCP433HEthicon, LLC · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID1 death1,093 reports
- Polysorb CL-915Covidien LP · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID503 reports
- Coated VICRYL VCP493HEthicon, LLC · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID435 reports
- V-Loc 180 VLOCL0316Covidien LP · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID1 recall376 reports
- Coated VICRYL VCP345HEthicon, LLC · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID1 death405 reports
- V-Loc 180 VLOCL0604Covidien LP · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID1 recall328 reports
- V-Loc 180 VLOCA008LCovidien LP · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID1 recall294 reports
- V-Loc 180 VLOCL0326Covidien LP · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID330 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page