Coated VICRYL J376HRecalls & reported problems
Ethicon, LLC · Violet Braided (Polyglactin 910), Synthetic Absorbable Suture · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Coated VICRYL (350)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 9
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 9 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10705031039438), received between Jul 18, 2019 and Feb 12, 2026 — classified as 9 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (8 reports).
6 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K022269, K183183); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break8
- Material Separation1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions5
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient4
Recent adverse event reports
The 9 most recent of 9 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionFeb 12, 2026Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CUSTOMER THAT THE SUTURE BROKE IN HALF AS DOCTOR WAS PLACING SUTURE IN INCISION TO SUTURE IT. NEEDLE PART WAS FOUND EMBEDDED IN TISSUE AND OTHER HALF IN NEEDLE DRIVER. NO OTHER DETAILS PROVIDED. THERE WERE NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24322561 ↗MalfunctionSep 5, 2025Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2025 AND SUTURE WAS USED. THE CUSTOMER HAD AN INCIDENT OF A BROKEN SUTURE IN A PATIENT. UNFORTUNATELY THE STAFF DIDN'T SAVE THE PACKING OR BROKEN PIECE ITSELF. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22982933 ↗MalfunctionApr 15, 2022Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2022 AND SUTURE WAS USED. THE NEEDLE PULLED OFF THE SUTURE WHILE LOADING ONTO NEEDLE DRIVER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 14119102 ↗MalfunctionAug 3, 2021Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A CHOLECYSTECTOMY PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2021 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, WHEN PASSING THE NEEDLE THROUGH THE FASCIA, THE NEEDLE WAS BROKEN IMMEDIATELY. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12270493 ↗MalfunctionApr 9, 2021Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A CHOLECYSTECTOMY PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2021 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, IT WAS REPORTED BY A SALES REP THAT, DURING A LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY, DURING WOUND CLOSURE, AFTER THE NEEDLE WAS PASSED THROUGH THE FASCIA, WHEN A SURGEON TRIED TO PUT THE 2ND STITCH, SURGEON NOTICED THAT THE NEEDLE TIP WAS BROKEN. THE BROKEN NEEDLE TIP WAS SEARCHED FOR ABOUT 10 MINUTES. THE NEEDLE TIP WAS CONFIRMED TO BE CAUGHT ON THE PERITONEUM AND REMOVED. THE OPERATION TIME WAS EXTENDED WITHIN 30 MINUTES. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11641951 ↗MalfunctionApr 28, 2020Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE IN 2020 AND THE SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE NEEDLE BROKE INTO TWO PIECES WHILE PASSING THROUGH TISSUE, UNKNOWN LAYER OF TISSUE, UNKNOWN LOOP. THE BROKEN PIECES WERE RETRIEVED FROM THE PATIENT, FOUND VISUALLY, NO X-RAY WAS NEEDED. A SECOND LIKE NEEDLE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 10006285 ↗MalfunctionApr 6, 2020Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2020 AND THE SUTURE WAS USED. WHILE CLOSING THE FASCIA, ¿SNAP" WAS HEARD AND WHEN PULLING THE SUTURE OUT, ONLY HALF OF THE NEEDLE WAS STILL ATTACHED. SINCE UNABLE TO VISUALIZE THE BROKEN NEEDLE WITHIN THE INCISION, FLUOROSCOPY WAS PERFORMED, AND THE IDENTIFIED NEEDLE WAS REMOVED. THERE WERE NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9931814 ↗MalfunctionApr 1, 2020Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE IN 2020 AND THE SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE NEEDLE BROKE INTO TWO PIECES WHILE PASSING THROUGH TISSUE, UNKNOWN LAYER OF TISSUE, UNKNOWN LOOP. THE BROKEN PIECES WERE RETRIEVED FROM THE PATIENT, FOUND VISUALLY, NO X-RAY WAS NEEDED. A SECOND LIKE NEEDLE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9914328 ↗MalfunctionJul 18, 2019Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2019 AND SUTURE WAS USED. THE NEEDLE WAS BROKEN AT THE BODY PART DURING FASCIA CLOSURE BY INTERRUPTED SUTURING. THE BROKEN NEEDLE WAS DROPPED IN THE ABDOMINAL CAVITY. THE WOUND WAS RE-OPENED, AND THE BROKEN NEEDLE WAS RETRIEVED, THEN THE WOUND WAS RE-CLOSED. THE OPERATION TIME WAS EXTENDED WITHIN 30 MINUTES. NO ADDITIONAL TREATMENT IS PLANNED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8805787 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under K022269, K183183. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-1513-2025 · Mar 7, 2025 · Open, ClassifiedPDSPLUSVIO30IN(75CM)USP6-0(M0.7)D/AC-1MP
- Z-0319-2025 · Sep 25, 2024 · Open, ClassifiedCoated VICRYL Polyglactin 910 Suture VIO 36IN(90CM) USP0(M3.5) S/A CT, Product Number J358H
- Z-2146-2024 · May 10, 2024 · Open, ClassifiedPDS II (polydioxanone) Suture - Intended for use in general soft tissue approximation, including use in paediatric cardiovascular tissue, in microsurgery and in ophthalmic surgery.
- Z-2144-2024 · May 10, 2024 · Open, ClassifiedVICRYL (polyglactin 910) Suture - Indicated for use in general soft tissue approximation and/or ligation, including use in ophthalmic surgery, but not for use in cardiovascular and
- Z-0989-2020 · Jan 3, 2020 · TerminatedCoated VICRYL (Polyglactin 910) Suture, 18" (45cm) Product Code J497H. The device is a synthetic absorbable sterile surgical suture.
- Z-1087-06 · May 4, 2006 · TerminatedCoated Vicryl (polyglactin 910) suture. Needle Type CTXB Suture size: 1. Vicryl suture is a synthetic absorbable sterile surgical suture comprised of a copolymer made from 90% gyc
Other SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID devices
- Coated VICRYL VCP433HEthicon, LLC · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID1 death1,093 reports
- Polysorb CL-915Covidien LP · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID503 reports
- Coated VICRYL VCP493HEthicon, LLC · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID435 reports
- V-Loc 180 VLOCL0316Covidien LP · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID1 recall376 reports
- Coated VICRYL VCP345HEthicon, LLC · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID1 death405 reports
- V-Loc 180 VLOCL0604Covidien LP · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID1 recall328 reports
- V-Loc 180 VLOCA008LCovidien LP · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID1 recall294 reports
- V-Loc 180 VLOCL0326Covidien LP · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID330 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page