Coated VICRYL J385HRecalls & reported problems
Ethicon, LLC · Violet Braided (Polyglactin 910), Synthetic Absorbable Suture · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Coated VICRYL (350)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 11
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 3
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 11 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10705031039476), received between Jan 22, 2020 and Jul 7, 2026 — classified as 3 injuries, 8 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (8 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break8
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
- Tear, Rip or Hole in Device Packaging1
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient4
- Insufficient Information2
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
- Pocket Erosion2
- Fluid Discharge1
- Local Reaction1
Recent adverse event reports
The 11 most recent of 11 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJul 7, 2026Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2026, AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE SURGERY YESTERDAY, USED SUTURE TO SUTURE THE INCISION. HOWEVER, WHEN THE DOCTOR TIGHTENED THE SUTURE, SUTURE BROKE. LATER, THE SUTURE WAS REPLACED FOR SUTURING. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25731800 ↗InjuryDec 13, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A SKIN TUMOR RESECTION+FASCIA FLAP RECONSTRUCTION SURGERY DUE TO A SEBACEOUS NEVUS ON THE HEAD ON 7-SEP-2023 AND SUTURE WAS USED FOR SUBCUTANEOUS TENSION REDUCTION AND COSMETIC SUTURING. AFTER THE SURGERY, THE PATIENT RETURNED HOME. MORE THAN A MONTH AFTER SURGERY, THE PATIENT DISCOVERED ABNORMAL SECRETIONS IN THE HEAD AND CAME TO THE HOSPITAL FOR FOLLOW-UP. AFTER UNDERSTANDING THE PATIENT'S CONDITION, LOCAL DEBRIDEMENT AND SUTURE REMOVAL WERE PERFORMED ON THE 84TH DAY AFTER SURGERY. THE PATIENT WAS INSTRUCTED TO COME TO THE HOSPITAL TOMORROW TO CONTINUE DRESSING CHANGES. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: Fluid Discharge
MAUDE report 18319572 ↗InjuryOct 10, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A SKIN MASS RESECTION UNDER LOCAL ANESTHESIA DUE TO A CYST ON THE UPPER ARM ON (B)(6) 2023 AND SUTURE WAS USED FOR SUBCUTANEOUS TENSION REDUCTION AND COSMETIC SUTURING. POST-OP, THE PATIENT WAS DISCHARGED AND RETURNED HOME. ON THE 36TH DAY AFTER SURGERY, THE PATIENT DISCOVERED A RED LUMP IN THE UPPER ARM AND CAME TO THE HOSPITAL FOR FURTHER CONSULTATION. THE PATIENT HAD DEVICE EXTRUSION. AFTER UNDERSTANDING THE PATIENT'S CONDITION, LOCAL DEBRIDEMENT AND SUTURE REMOVAL WERE PERFORMED. FEEDBACK WAS PROVIDED 3 DAYS AFTER REMOVAL, AND THE HEALING WAS GOOD. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: Local Reaction; Pocket Erosion
MAUDE report 17904937 ↗InjuryJul 21, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN EXCISION AND PLASTIC SURGERY FOR SKIN TUMORS ON (B)(6) 2023 AND SUTURE WAS USED. THE PATIENT CAME TO THE HOSPITAL FOR TREATMENT DUE TO A "BACK PIGMENTED NEVUS" AND UNDERWENT THE PROCEDURE. THE SURGEON USED SUTURE FOR SUBCUTANEOUS TENSION REDUCTION AND COSMETIC SUTURING. POST-OP, THE PATIENT RETURNED HOME. AFTER 20 DAYS SINCE THE SURGERY, THE PATIENT'S FAMILY DISCOVERED A SUTURE ON THE BACK, AND THE PATIENT CAME TO THE HOSPITAL FOR FURTHER CONSULTATION. THE DEVICE EXTRUDED. AFTER THE DOCTOR LEARNED ABOUT THE PATIENT'S CONDITION, THE DOCTOR PERFORMED LOCAL DEBRIDEMENT AND SUTURE REMOVAL. THREE DAYS AFTER REMOVAL, THE PATIENT REPORTED GOOD HEALING. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: Pocket Erosion
MAUDE report 17372404 ↗MalfunctionMay 12, 2022Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN ANIMAL UNDERWENT A CHERRY EYE REPAIR PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2022 AND SUTURE WAS USED. ONE WEEK POST-OPERATIVELY, THE PATIENT RETURNED AND UPON INSPECTION IT WAS FOUND THAT THE SUTURE HAD BROKEN. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 14380048 ↗MalfunctionMay 12, 2022Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN ANIMAL UNDERWENT A CHERRY EYE REPAIR PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2022 AND SUTURE WAS USED. ONE WEEK POST-OPERATIVELY, THE PATIENT RETURNED AND UPON INSPECTION IT WAS FOUND THAT THE SUTURE HAD BROKEN. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 14379671 ↗MalfunctionMay 11, 2022Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN ANIMAL UNDERWENT A CHERRY EYE REPAIR PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2022 AND SUTURE WAS USED. UPON INSPECTION AT AN UNKNOWN TIME POST-OPERATIVELY, IT WAS FOUND THAT THE SUTURE HAD BROKEN. THERE WERE NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 14364788 ↗MalfunctionMay 27, 2020Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A CESAREAN SECTION ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED TO CLOSE THE FASCIA. THE SUTURE BROKE DURING KNOT TYING. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 10091894 ↗MalfunctionMay 27, 2020Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A CESAREAN SECTION ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED TO CLOSE THE FASCIA. THE SUTURE WAS BROKEN WHEN HALF WAS THROUGH FASCIA WHEN TENTING THE TISSUE UP. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 10091893 ↗MalfunctionApr 21, 2020Break; Tear, Rip or Hole in Device Packaging; Break; Tear, Rip or Hole in Device Packaging
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2020; AND A SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE SUTURE BROKE. ANOTHER LIKE DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9981301 ↗MalfunctionJan 22, 2020Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. THE SUTURE BROKE WHEN SEWING DURING DEBRIDEMENT AND SUTURE. CHANGED TO ANOTHER DEVICE TO COMPLETE THE SURGERY. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION COULD BE PROVIDED. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9618317 ↗
Other SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID devices
- Coated VICRYL VCP433HEthicon, LLC · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID1 death1,093 reports
- Polysorb CL-915Covidien LP · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID503 reports
- Coated VICRYL VCP493HEthicon, LLC · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID435 reports
- V-Loc 180 VLOCL0316Covidien LP · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID1 recall376 reports
- Coated VICRYL VCP345HEthicon, LLC · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID1 death405 reports
- V-Loc 180 VLOCL0604Covidien LP · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID1 recall328 reports
- V-Loc 180 VLOCA008LCovidien LP · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID1 recall294 reports
- V-Loc 180 VLOCL0326Covidien LP · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID330 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page