Coated VICRYL J662HRecalls & reported problems
Ethicon, LLC · Undyed Braided (Polyglactin 910), Synthetic Absorbable Suture · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Coated VICRYL (350)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 9
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 9 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10705031042070), received between Mar 31, 2022 and Oct 28, 2022 — classified as 9 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Integrity Problem” (7 reports).
3 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K022269); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Material Integrity Problem7
- Material Separation2
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions5
- Pocket Erosion2
- Wound Dehiscence2
- Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding1
Recent adverse event reports
The 9 most recent of 9 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionOct 28, 2022Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A OB-GYN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2022 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING AN OB CASE MULTIPLE STITCHES HAD THE NEEDLE POP OFF WHILE SUTURING DURING CLOSURE. THEY HAD TO START OVER. THE CASE WAS COMPLETED WITH NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15692882 ↗MalfunctionOct 28, 2022Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A OB-GYN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2022 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING AN OB CASE MULTIPLE STITCHES HAD THE NEEDLE POP OFF WHILE SUTURING DURING CLOSURE. THEY HAD TO START OVER. THE CASE WAS COMPLETED WITH NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15692228 ↗MalfunctionApr 8, 2022Material Integrity Problem; Material Integrity Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A CAESARIAN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2022 AND SUTURE WAS USED. ON (B)(6) 2022 SUTURE POPPED OUT ON RIGHT INCISION, REMOVED 4CMS OF SUTURE, INTACT. IT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE AN ABSORBABLE SUTURE BUT IT WASN'T ABSORBING. THERE WERE NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: Pocket Erosion
MAUDE report 14056712 ↗MalfunctionApr 8, 2022Material Integrity Problem; Material Integrity Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A CAESARIAN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2021 AND SUTURE WAS USED. ON (B)(6) 2022 RETAINED SUTURE REMOVAL OCCURRED - SMALL WOUND SEPARATION, CLEANED. ON (B)(6) 2022- SMALL AREA NOT HEALED WITH DRAINAGE-CLEANSED. IT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE AN ABSORBABLE SUTURE BUT IT WASN'T ABSORBING. THERE WERE NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: Wound Dehiscence
MAUDE report 14056505 ↗MalfunctionApr 8, 2022Material Integrity Problem; Material Integrity Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A CAESARIAN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2021 AND SUTURE WAS USED. ON (B)(6) 2022 IT WAS NOTED THAT THE RIGHT SIDE CORNER SUTURE REMOVED-POPPED THROUGH. IT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE AN ABSORBABLE SUTURE BUT IT WASN'T ABSORBING. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: Pocket Erosion
MAUDE report 14056091 ↗MalfunctionApr 8, 2022Material Integrity Problem; Material Integrity Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A CAESAREAN SECTION PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2021 AND SUTURE WAS USED. ON (B)(6) 2021 THE PATIENT WAS SEEN WITH IRRITATED LEFT INCISION, 1.5CM SEPARATION WITH DRAINAGE, SAW THIN SUTURE, CLEANSED. ON (B)(6) 2021 BLEEDING FROM INCISION, LEFT CORNER SEPARATION, SUTURE REMOVED. IT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE AN ABSORBABLE SUTURE BUT IT WASN'T ABSORBING. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding; Wound Dehiscence
MAUDE report 14055526 ↗MalfunctionApr 8, 2022Material Integrity Problem; Material Integrity Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A CAESARIAN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2022 AND SUTURE WAS USED. ON (B)(6) 2022 EDGES SLIGHTLY EVERTED, SOME STITCHES REMOVED, 2/24-INCISION HEALED. IT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE AN ABSORBABLE SUTURE BUT IT WASN'T ABSORBING. THERE WERE NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 14054356 ↗MalfunctionApr 8, 2022Material Integrity Problem; Material Integrity Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A CAESARIAN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2022 AND SUTURE WAS USED. (B)(6) 2022 IT WAS NOTED 0.5CM SHALLOW REDNESS WITH SUTURE EXPOSED-5CM SUTURE REMOVED, (B)(6) 2022-RETURNED FOR WOUND RECHECK-2 DOTS POPPING OUT OF INCISION-PHYSICIAN COULD NOT REACH THEM. IT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE AN ABSORBABLE SUTURE BUT IT WASN'T ABSORBING. THERE WERE NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 14054338 ↗MalfunctionMar 31, 2022Material Integrity Problem; Material Integrity Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A CAESARIAN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2021 AND SUTURE WAS USED. IT WAS NOTED THAT THE PATIENT RETURNED OVER THE PAST WEEKS WITH PROBLEMS WITH THIS SUTURE. IT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE AN ABSORBABLE SUTURE BUT IT WASN'T ABSORBING. THERE WERE NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13968875 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under K022269. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-2144-2024 · May 10, 2024 · Open, ClassifiedVICRYL (polyglactin 910) Suture - Indicated for use in general soft tissue approximation and/or ligation, including use in ophthalmic surgery, but not for use in cardiovascular and
- Z-0989-2020 · Jan 3, 2020 · TerminatedCoated VICRYL (Polyglactin 910) Suture, 18" (45cm) Product Code J497H. The device is a synthetic absorbable sterile surgical suture.
- Z-1087-06 · May 4, 2006 · TerminatedCoated Vicryl (polyglactin 910) suture. Needle Type CTXB Suture size: 1. Vicryl suture is a synthetic absorbable sterile surgical suture comprised of a copolymer made from 90% gyc
Other SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID devices
- Coated VICRYL VCP433HEthicon, LLC · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID1 death1,093 reports
- Polysorb CL-915Covidien LP · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID503 reports
- Coated VICRYL VCP493HEthicon, LLC · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID435 reports
- V-Loc 180 VLOCL0316Covidien LP · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID1 recall376 reports
- Coated VICRYL VCP345HEthicon, LLC · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID1 death405 reports
- V-Loc 180 VLOCL0604Covidien LP · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID1 recall328 reports
- V-Loc 180 VLOCA008LCovidien LP · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID1 recall294 reports
- V-Loc 180 VLOCL0326Covidien LP · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID330 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page