Skip to content

Coated VICRYL J662HRecalls & reported problems

Ethicon, LLC · Undyed Braided (Polyglactin 910), Synthetic Absorbable Suture · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Coated VICRYL (350)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
9
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 9 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10705031042070), received between Mar 31, 2022 and Oct 28, 2022 — classified as 9 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Integrity Problem” (7 reports).

3 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K022269); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Material Integrity Problem7
  • Material Separation2

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions5
  • Pocket Erosion2
  • Wound Dehiscence2
  • Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding1

Recent adverse event reports

The 9 most recent of 9 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionOct 28, 2022Material Separation; Material Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A OB-GYN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2022 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING AN OB CASE MULTIPLE STITCHES HAD THE NEEDLE POP OFF WHILE SUTURING DURING CLOSURE. THEY HAD TO START OVER. THE CASE WAS COMPLETED WITH NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15692882 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 28, 2022Material Separation; Material Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A OB-GYN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2022 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING AN OB CASE MULTIPLE STITCHES HAD THE NEEDLE POP OFF WHILE SUTURING DURING CLOSURE. THEY HAD TO START OVER. THE CASE WAS COMPLETED WITH NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15692228 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 8, 2022Material Integrity Problem; Material Integrity Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A CAESARIAN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2022 AND SUTURE WAS USED. ON (B)(6) 2022 SUTURE POPPED OUT ON RIGHT INCISION, REMOVED 4CMS OF SUTURE, INTACT. IT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE AN ABSORBABLE SUTURE BUT IT WASN'T ABSORBING. THERE WERE NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Pocket Erosion

    MAUDE report 14056712 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 8, 2022Material Integrity Problem; Material Integrity Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A CAESARIAN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2021 AND SUTURE WAS USED. ON (B)(6) 2022 RETAINED SUTURE REMOVAL OCCURRED - SMALL WOUND SEPARATION, CLEANED. ON (B)(6) 2022- SMALL AREA NOT HEALED WITH DRAINAGE-CLEANSED. IT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE AN ABSORBABLE SUTURE BUT IT WASN'T ABSORBING. THERE WERE NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Wound Dehiscence

    MAUDE report 14056505 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 8, 2022Material Integrity Problem; Material Integrity Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A CAESARIAN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2021 AND SUTURE WAS USED. ON (B)(6) 2022 IT WAS NOTED THAT THE RIGHT SIDE CORNER SUTURE REMOVED-POPPED THROUGH. IT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE AN ABSORBABLE SUTURE BUT IT WASN'T ABSORBING. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Pocket Erosion

    MAUDE report 14056091 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 8, 2022Material Integrity Problem; Material Integrity Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A CAESAREAN SECTION PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2021 AND SUTURE WAS USED. ON (B)(6) 2021 THE PATIENT WAS SEEN WITH IRRITATED LEFT INCISION, 1.5CM SEPARATION WITH DRAINAGE, SAW THIN SUTURE, CLEANSED. ON (B)(6) 2021 BLEEDING FROM INCISION, LEFT CORNER SEPARATION, SUTURE REMOVED. IT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE AN ABSORBABLE SUTURE BUT IT WASN'T ABSORBING. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding; Wound Dehiscence

    MAUDE report 14055526 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 8, 2022Material Integrity Problem; Material Integrity Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A CAESARIAN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2022 AND SUTURE WAS USED. ON (B)(6) 2022 EDGES SLIGHTLY EVERTED, SOME STITCHES REMOVED, 2/24-INCISION HEALED. IT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE AN ABSORBABLE SUTURE BUT IT WASN'T ABSORBING. THERE WERE NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 14054356 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 8, 2022Material Integrity Problem; Material Integrity Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A CAESARIAN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2022 AND SUTURE WAS USED. (B)(6) 2022 IT WAS NOTED 0.5CM SHALLOW REDNESS WITH SUTURE EXPOSED-5CM SUTURE REMOVED, (B)(6) 2022-RETURNED FOR WOUND RECHECK-2 DOTS POPPING OUT OF INCISION-PHYSICIAN COULD NOT REACH THEM. IT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE AN ABSORBABLE SUTURE BUT IT WASN'T ABSORBING. THERE WERE NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 14054338 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 31, 2022Material Integrity Problem; Material Integrity Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A CAESARIAN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2021 AND SUTURE WAS USED. IT WAS NOTED THAT THE PATIENT RETURNED OVER THE PAST WEEKS WITH PROBLEMS WITH THIS SUTURE. IT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE AN ABSORBABLE SUTURE BUT IT WASN'T ABSORBING. THERE WERE NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 13968875 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under K022269. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-2144-2024 · May 10, 2024 · Open, Classified
    VICRYL (polyglactin 910) Suture - Indicated for use in general soft tissue approximation and/or ligation, including use in ophthalmic surgery, but not for use in cardiovascular and
  • Z-0989-2020 · Jan 3, 2020 · Terminated
    Coated VICRYL (Polyglactin 910) Suture, 18" (45cm) Product Code J497H. The device is a synthetic absorbable sterile surgical suture.
  • Z-1087-06 · May 4, 2006 · Terminated
    Coated Vicryl (polyglactin 910) suture. Needle Type CTXB Suture size: 1. Vicryl suture is a synthetic absorbable sterile surgical suture comprised of a copolymer made from 90% gyc

Other SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID devices

All SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page