Skip to content

Coated VICRYL J683GRecalls & reported problems

Ethicon, LLC · Undyed Braided (Polyglactin 910), Synthetic Absorbable Suture · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Coated VICRYL (350)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
14
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 14 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10705031042186), received between Jul 27, 2022 and Oct 14, 2024 — classified as 14 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Separation” (12 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 9 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520269
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Material Separation12
  • Break5

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions12
  • Foreign Body In Patient2

Recent adverse event reports

The 14 most recent of 14 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionOct 14, 2024Material Separation; Material Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE IN 2024 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, HAD 9 BOXES TOTAL OF ITEM J683G FROM THE SAME LOT# UBMPDE WHERE ALL OF THE SUTURES HAVE BEEN BREAKING OFF OF THE NEEDLE ONCE THE NEEDLE WAS PULLED THROUGH PATIENTS SKIN. THE IMPACT HAS BEEN PROCEDURE DELAY AND HAVING TO USE AN ADDITIONAL 16G NEEDLE TO FEED THE SUTURE IN ORDER TO COMPLETE THE SUTURE LINE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20444904 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 14, 2024Material Separation; Material Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE IN (B)(6) 2024 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, HAD 9 BOXES TOTAL OF ITEM J683G FROM THE SAME LOT# UBMPDE WHERE ALL OF THE SUTURES HAVE BEEN BREAKING OFF OF THE NEEDLE ONCE THE NEEDLE WAS PULLED THROUGH PATIENTS SKIN. THE IMPACT HAS BEEN PROCEDURE DELAY AND HAVING TO USE AN ADDITIONAL 16G NEEDLE TO FEED THE SUTURE IN ORDER TO COMPLETE THE SUTURE LINE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20444900 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 14, 2024Material Separation; Material Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE IN (B)(6) 2024 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, HAD 9 BOXES TOTAL OF ITEM J683G FROM THE SAME LOT# UBMPDE WHERE ALL OF THE SUTURES HAVE BEEN BREAKING OFF OF THE NEEDLE ONCE THE NEEDLE WAS PULLED THROUGH PATIENTS SKIN. THE IMPACT HAS BEEN PROCEDURE DELAY AND HAVING TO USE AN ADDITIONAL 16G NEEDLE TO FEED THE SUTURE IN ORDER TO COMPLETE THE SUTURE LINE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20444433 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 14, 2024Material Separation; Material Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE IN 2024 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, HAD 9 BOXES TOTAL OF ITEM J683G FROM THE SAME LOT# UBMPDE WHERE ALL OF THE SUTURES HAVE BEEN BREAKING OFF OF THE NEEDLE ONCE THE NEEDLE WAS PULLED THROUGH PATIENTS SKIN. THE IMPACT HAS BEEN PROCEDURE DELAY AND HAVING TO USE AN ADDITIONAL 16G NEEDLE TO FEED THE SUTURE IN ORDER TO COMPLETE THE SUTURE LINE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20444263 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 14, 2024Material Separation; Material Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE IN (B)(6) 2024 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, HAD 9 BOXES TOTAL OF ITEM J683G FROM THE SAME LOT# UBMPDE WHERE ALL OF THE SUTURES HAVE BEEN BREAKING OFF OF THE NEEDLE ONCE THE NEEDLE WAS PULLED THROUGH PATIENTS SKIN. THE IMPACT HAS BEEN PROCEDURE DELAY AND HAVING TO USE AN ADDITIONAL 16G NEEDLE TO FEED THE SUTURE IN ORDER TO COMPLETE THE SUTURE LINE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20440987 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 14, 2024Material Separation; Material Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE IN 2024 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, HAD 9 BOXES TOTAL OF ITEM J683G FROM THE SAME LOT# UBMPDE WHERE ALL OF THE SUTURES HAVE BEEN BREAKING OFF OF THE NEEDLE ONCE THE NEEDLE WAS PULLED THROUGH PATIENTS SKIN. THE IMPACT HAS BEEN PROCEDURE DELAY AND HAVING TO USE AN ADDITIONAL 16G NEEDLE TO FEED THE SUTURE IN ORDER TO COMPLETE THE SUTURE LINE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20440448 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 14, 2024Material Separation; Material Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE IN 2024 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, HAD 9 BOXES TOTAL OF ITEM J683G FROM THE SAME LOT# UBMPDE WHERE ALL OF THE SUTURES HAVE BEEN BREAKING OFF OF THE NEEDLE ONCE THE NEEDLE WAS PULLED THROUGH PATIENTS SKIN. THE IMPACT HAS BEEN PROCEDURE DELAY AND HAVING TO USE AN ADDITIONAL 16G NEEDLE TO FEED THE SUTURE IN ORDER TO COMPLETE THE SUTURE LINE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20440396 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 14, 2024Material Separation; Material Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE IN 2024 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, HAD 9 BOXES TOTAL OF ITEM J683G FROM THE SAME LOT# UBMPDE WHERE ALL OF THE SUTURES HAVE BEEN BREAKING OFF OF THE NEEDLE ONCE THE NEEDLE WAS PULLED THROUGH PATIENTS SKIN. THE IMPACT HAS BEEN PROCEDURE DELAY AND HAVING TO USE AN ADDITIONAL 16G NEEDLE TO FEED THE SUTURE IN ORDER TO COMPLETE THE SUTURE LINE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20440252 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 14, 2024Material Separation; Material Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE IN 2024 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, HAD 9 BOXES TOTAL OF ITEM J683G FROM THE SAME LOT# UBMPDE WHERE ALL OF THE SUTURES HAVE BEEN BREAKING OFF OF THE NEEDLE ONCE THE NEEDLE WAS PULLED THROUGH PATIENTS SKIN. THE IMPACT HAS BEEN PROCEDURE DELAY AND HAVING TO USE AN ADDITIONAL 16G NEEDLE TO FEED THE SUTURE IN ORDER TO COMPLETE THE SUTURE LINE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20440195 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 4, 2022Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN EXCISION OF RECURRENT CARCINOMA FROM RIGHT MASTECTOMY SITE ON (B)(6) 2022 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE TIP OF THE SUTURE BROKE WHILE IN USE. THE NEEDLE TIP WAS LOCATED AND REMOVED FROM THE WOUND. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 15166735 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 4, 2022Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN EXCISION OF RECURRENT CARCINOMA FROM RIGHT MASTECTOMY SITE ON (B)(6) 2022 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE TIP OF THE SUTURE BROKE WHILE IN USE. THE NEEDLE TIP WAS LOCATED AND REMOVED FROM THE WOUND. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 15166653 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 27, 2022Break; Material Separation; Break; Material Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2022 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, A TOTAL OF FOUR OF THE SUTURES WERE USED. TWO OF THE FOUR SUTURES NEEDLE TIPS BROKE OFF WHILE IN USE. THEY WERE ABLE TO BE RETRIEVED BY THE SURGEON. THEY WERE ALL FROM THE SAME SUTURE BOX. THE BROKEN SUTURE IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR RETURN. THERE WERE NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15114310 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 27, 2022Break; Material Separation; Break; Material Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2022 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, A TOTAL OF FOUR OF THE SUTURES WERE USED. TWO OF THE FOUR SUTURES NEEDLE TIPS BROKE OFF WHILE IN USE. THEY WERE ABLE TO BE RETRIEVED BY THE SURGEON. THEY WERE ALL FROM THE SAME SUTURE BOX. THE BROKEN SUTURE IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR RETURN. THERE WERE NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15114271 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 27, 2022Break; Material Separation; Break; Material Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2022 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, A TOTAL OF FOUR OF THE SUTURES WERE USED. TWO OF THE FOUR SUTURES NEEDLE TIPS BROKE OFF WHILE IN USE. THEY WERE ABLE TO BE RETRIEVED BY THE SURGEON. THEY WERE ALL FROM THE SAME SUTURE BOX. THE BROKEN SUTURE IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR RETURN. THERE WERE NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15114236 ↗

Other SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID devices

All SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page