Coated VICRYL JB840Recalls & reported problems
Ethicon, LLC · Undyed Braided (Polyglactin 910), Synthetic Absorbable Suture · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Coated VICRYL (350)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
Quick summary
This Ethicon Coated VICRYL suture is a synthetic absorbable suture. The 81 reports mostly describe material separation or breakage, often of control-release needle-sutures during surgery, and mention 3 injuries, no deaths. There are no recalls naming this device. Reports fell to 0 in the last 12 months from 8 the prior year.
AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.
- Adverse event reports
- 81
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 3
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 81 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10705031044029), received between Jun 26, 2019 and Mar 11, 2025 — classified as 3 injuries, 78 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Separation” (66 reports).
3 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K022269); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Material Separation66
- Break9
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
- Device Contaminated During Manufacture or Shipping2
- Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions65
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient13
- Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding2
- Fever1
- Hematoma1
- Hernia1
Recent adverse event reports
The 25 most recent of 81 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMar 11, 2025Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN SURGERY ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, WHEN USING AS USUAL, THE SUTURE AND NEEDLE WERE DETACHED EASILY FOR THREE PACKAGES IN A ROW. IT WAS A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. ANOTHER PRODUCT WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. NO SAMPLE WILL BE RETURNED. FURTHER DETAILS ARE NOT PROVIDED FROM THE HP. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21576141 ↗MalfunctionMar 11, 2025Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN SURGERY ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, WHEN USING AS USUAL, THE SUTURE AND NEEDLE WERE DETACHED EASILY FOR THREE PACKAGES IN A ROW. IT WAS A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. ANOTHER PRODUCT WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. NO SAMPLE WILL BE RETURNED. FURTHER DETAILS ARE NOT PROVIDED FROM THE HP. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21576133 ↗MalfunctionMar 11, 2025Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN SURGERY ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, WHEN USING AS USUAL, THE SUTURE AND NEEDLE WERE DETACHED EASILY FOR THREE PACKAGES IN A ROW. IT WAS A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. ANOTHER PRODUCT WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. NO SAMPLE WILL BE RETURNED. FURTHER DETAILS ARE NOT PROVIDED FROM THE HP. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21576123 ↗MalfunctionMar 7, 2025Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING AN UNKNOWN SURGERY, TWO OF EIGHT NEEDLE-SUTURES WERE COME OFF FROM THE BEGINNING. TWO OF THE REMAINING FOUR NEEDLE-SUTURES IN THE PACKAGE WERE THE PRODUCT INVOLVED. IT WAS A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. ANOTHER PRODUCT WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21548738 ↗MalfunctionMar 7, 2025Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING AN UNKNOWN SURGERY, TWO OF EIGHT NEEDLE-SUTURES WERE COME OFF FROM THE BEGINNING. TWO OF THE REMAINING FOUR NEEDLE-SUTURES IN THE PACKAGE WERE THE PRODUCT INVOLVED. IT WAS A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. ANOTHER PRODUCT WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21548737 ↗MalfunctionMar 6, 2025Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING AN UNKNOWN SURGERY, THE SUTURE WAS BROKEN DURING SUTURING. IT WAS A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. THERE WAS NO EFFECT ON THE PATIENT. ANOTHER PRODUCT WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. NO SAMPLE WILL BE RETURNED. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED AT THIS TIME.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21537559 ↗MalfunctionDec 12, 2024Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2024 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, IT WAS REPORTED BY A SALES REP THAT, DURING A TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY: TKA, THE CONTROL RELEASE WAS DETACHED EASILY. IT WAS A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. FURTHER DETAILS ARE NOT PROVIDED FROM THE HP. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20919182 ↗MalfunctionNov 15, 2024Device Contaminated During Manufacture or Shipping; Device Contaminated During Manufacture or Shipping
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN OB-GYN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2024 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING AN UNKNOWN OB-GYN SURGERY, A HAIR WAS FOUND IN THE PACKAGE. IT WAS A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20695016 ↗MalfunctionSep 19, 2024Device Contaminated During Manufacture or Shipping; Device Contaminated During Manufacture or Shipping
IT WAS REPORTED A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2024 AND SUTURE WAS USED. IT WAS A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. A FOREIGN MATTER LIKE THIN SUTURE WAS FOUND IN THE TRAY WHEN THE PACKAGE WAS OPENED. FURTHER DETAILS ARE NOT PROVIDED. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20261280 ↗MalfunctionJul 15, 2024Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2024 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, IT WAS REPORTED BY A SALES REP THAT, THE SUTURE WAS DETACHED EASILY. IT WAS A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. NO SAMPLE WILL BE RETURNED. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19742292 ↗MalfunctionJul 15, 2024Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2024 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, IT WAS REPORTED BY A SALES REP THAT, THE SUTURE WAS DETACHED EASILY. IT WAS A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. NO SAMPLE WILL BE RETURNED. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19742291 ↗MalfunctionJul 15, 2024Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2024 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, IT WAS REPORTED BY A SALES REP THAT, THE SUTURE WAS DETACHED EASILY. IT WAS A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. NO SAMPLE WILL BE RETURNED. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19742236 ↗MalfunctionJul 15, 2024Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2024 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, IT WAS REPORTED BY A SALES REP THAT, THE SUTURE WAS DETACHED EASILY. IT WAS A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. NO SAMPLE WILL BE RETURNED. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19742235 ↗MalfunctionJul 15, 2024Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2024 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, IT WAS REPORTED BY A SALES REP THAT, THE SUTURE WAS DETACHED EASILY. IT WAS A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. NO SAMPLE WILL BE RETURNED. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19742211 ↗MalfunctionJul 15, 2024Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2024 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, IT WAS REPORTED BY A SALES REP THAT, THE SUTURE WAS DETACHED EASILY. IT WAS A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. NO SAMPLE WILL BE RETURNED. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19742198 ↗MalfunctionJun 27, 2024Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A MYOMECTOMY ON (B)(6) 2024 AND SUTURE WAS USED ON THE FASCIA. DURING INTERRUPTED SUTURE, THE NEEDLE AND THE SUTURE DETACHED EASILY MORE THAN USUAL. THERE WAS NO OPERATION EXTENSION TIME. IT WAS A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19622309 ↗MalfunctionJun 25, 2024Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2024, AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE SURGERY, DURING INTERRUPTED SUTURE, THE SUTURE AND NEEDLE WERE DETACHED EASILY. IT WAS A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19605397 ↗MalfunctionJun 17, 2024Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A C-SECTION PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2024 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING A CAESAREAN SECTION (C-SECTION), WHEN HOLDING THE NEEDLE WITH THE NEEDLE-HOLDER AND PULLING OUT FROM THE CASE, THE NEEDLE WAS DETACHED FROM THE CONNECTION OF THE NEEDLE AND SUTURE DURING INTERRUPTED SUTURE. THE PRODUCT WAS USED ON THE UTERUS. IT WAS A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19548366 ↗MalfunctionJun 17, 2024Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A C-SECTION PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2024 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING A CAESAREAN SECTION (C-SECTION), WHEN HOLDING THE NEEDLE WITH THE NEEDLE-HOLDER AND PULLING OUT FROM THE CASE, THE NEEDLE WAS DETACHED FROM THE CONNECTION OF THE NEEDLE AND SUTURE DURING INTERRUPTED SUTURE. THE PRODUCT WAS USED ON THE UTERUS. IT WAS A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19548362 ↗MalfunctionMay 9, 2024Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN SURGERY ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. THE NEEDLE HAD BEEN DETACHED FROM THE SUTURE EASILY. IT WAS NOT A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19276754 ↗MalfunctionMar 14, 2024Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE; AND A SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE SUTURE WAS DETACHED FROM THE NEEDLE IMMEDIATELY DURING USE. IT WAS A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18905776 ↗MalfunctionMar 14, 2024Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE; AND A SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE SUTURE WAS DETACHED FROM THE NEEDLE IMMEDIATELY DURING USE. IT WAS A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18905765 ↗MalfunctionFeb 7, 2024Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A C-SECTION PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, WHEN THE SUTURE OF JB840 WAS PULLED DURING SUTURE, THE SUTURE WAS EASILY DETACHED FROM THE NEEDLE. JB840 WAS IN ¿OBGYN5¿ WHICH IS SOLD AS A KIT IN JAPAN. IT WAS A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18659580 ↗MalfunctionFeb 7, 2024Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A C-SECTION PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, WHEN THE SUTURE OF JB840 WAS PULLED DURING SUTURE, THE SUTURE WAS DETACHED FROM THE NEEDLE. JB840 WAS IN ¿OBGYN5¿ WHICH IS SOLD AS A KIT IN JAPAN. IT WAS A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. FURTHER DETAILS ARE NOT PROVIDED FROM THE HP. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18659246 ↗InjuryFeb 6, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A C-SECTION WITH HER THIRD CHILD ON (B)(6) 2024 AND SUTURE WAS USED AS A Z SUTURE. THE SURGEON MADE A TRANSVERSE INCISION IN THE PATIENT'S LOWER UTERINE SEGMENT. AT THE TIME OF SURGERY, THINNING WAS CONFIRMED IN THE LOWER PART OF THE UTERUS, AND THE SURGEON, BASED ON THE SURGEON¿S EXPERIENCE, WAS WARY OF THE OCCURRENCE OF HEMATOMA AND FOUND INTERNAL BLEEDING IN THE LEFT SIDE OF THE UTERUS, SO THE SURGEON STOPPED THE BLEEDING WITH A TWO-NEEDLE Z-SUTURE. SUBSEQUENTLY, THE PATIENT WAS FOUND TO BE BLEEDING FROM HER VAGINA, AND THE SURGEON ATTEMPTED TO STOP THE BLEEDING BY INSERTING BALLOON, BUT THE BLEEDING CONTINUED AND THE PATIENT LOST 3,000 ML OF BLOOD. THE PATIENT WAS URGENTLY TRANSPORTED TO A DIFFERENT HOSPITAL. WHEN THE INSERTED BALLOON WAS REMOVED TWO DAYS AFTER ADMISSION AT THE NEW HOSPITAL, THERE WAS FURTHER BLEEDING, SO ANGIOGRAPHY WAS PERFORMED. BLEEDING WAS CONFIRMED IN THE UTERINE CAVITY, AND HEMOSTASIS AND ARTERIAL EMBOLIZATION WAS PERFORMED. THEREAFTER, THE PATIENT'S PROGRESS WAS GOOD, AND AS OF (B)(6) 2024, SHE HAD RECOVERED TO THE POINT WHERE SHE WAS ABLE TO WALK IN THE HOSPITAL. THIS WAS THE FIRST TIME, THE SURGEON HAD EXPERIEN
Patient problems: Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding
MAUDE report 18648025 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under K022269. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-2144-2024 · May 10, 2024 · Open, ClassifiedVICRYL (polyglactin 910) Suture - Indicated for use in general soft tissue approximation and/or ligation, including use in ophthalmic surgery, but not for use in cardiovascular and
- Z-0989-2020 · Jan 3, 2020 · TerminatedCoated VICRYL (Polyglactin 910) Suture, 18" (45cm) Product Code J497H. The device is a synthetic absorbable sterile surgical suture.
- Z-1087-06 · May 4, 2006 · TerminatedCoated Vicryl (polyglactin 910) suture. Needle Type CTXB Suture size: 1. Vicryl suture is a synthetic absorbable sterile surgical suture comprised of a copolymer made from 90% gyc
Other SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID devices
- Coated VICRYL VCP433HEthicon, LLC · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID1 death1,093 reports
- Polysorb CL-915Covidien LP · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID503 reports
- Coated VICRYL VCP493HEthicon, LLC · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID435 reports
- V-Loc 180 VLOCL0316Covidien LP · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID1 recall376 reports
- Coated VICRYL VCP345HEthicon, LLC · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID1 death405 reports
- V-Loc 180 VLOCL0604Covidien LP · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID1 recall328 reports
- V-Loc 180 VLOCA008LCovidien LP · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID1 recall294 reports
- V-Loc 180 VLOCL0326Covidien LP · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID330 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page