Skip to content

MONOCRYL MCP315HRecalls & reported problems

Ethicon, LLC · Antibacterial Violet Monofilament (Poliglecaprone 25), Absorbable Surgical Suture · Class 2 · Implant

All models of MONOCRYL (127)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
11
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 11 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10705031046351), received between Apr 6, 2021 and Apr 15, 2026 — classified as 11 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Separation” (9 reports).

2 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K050845, K201996); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 1 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 1 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 4 reportsApr 2026: 1 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520264
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Material Separation9
  • Break2

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions11

Recent adverse event reports

The 11 most recent of 11 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionApr 15, 2026Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2026 SUTURE WAS USED. THE NURSE ADVISED THAT THE TIP BROKE OFF THE NEEDLE DURING SUTURING OF THE URETER. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24888650 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 17, 2026Material Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. IT WAS REPORTED BY THE DISTRIBUTOR THAT NEEDLES ARE DEFECTED. LAST 3 TIME THE NEEDLE COMES APART FROM THE SUTURE. NO ADVERSE IMPACT WAS REPORTED. DEVICE IS AVAILABLE FOR RETURN. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24619305 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 17, 2026Material Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. IT WAS REPORTED BY THE DISTRIBUTOR THAT NEEDLES ARE DEFECTED. LAST 3 TIME THE NEEDLE COMES APART FROM THE SUTURE. NO ADVERSE IMPACT WAS REPORTED. DEVICE IS AVAILABLE FOR RETURN. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24619304 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 17, 2026Material Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. IT WAS REPORTED BY THE DISTRIBUTOR THAT NEEDLES ARE DEFECTED. LAST 3 TIME THE NEEDLE COMES APART FROM THE SUTURE. NO ADVERSE IMPACT WAS REPORTED. DEVICE IS AVAILABLE FOR RETURN. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24619298 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 17, 2026Material Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. IT WAS REPORTED BY THE DISTRIBUTOR THAT NEEDLES ARE DEFECTED. LAST 3 TIME THE NEEDLE COMES APART FROM THE SUTURE. NO ADVERSE IMPACT WAS REPORTED. DEVICE IS AVAILABLE FOR RETURN. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24619296 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 5, 2025Material Separation; Material Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2023 AND SUTURE WAS USED. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE NEEDLE DISASSEMBLED. THERE WERE NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21315157 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 22, 2024Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE IN (B)(6) 2024 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE SUTURE IS BROKEN WHILE USING. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20505755 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 6, 2021Material Separation; Material Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A LAPAROSCOPIC ABDOMINAL PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE IN 2021 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE SUTURE GOT DETACHED FROM THE NEEDLE THREE TIMES. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 11623046 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 6, 2021Material Separation; Material Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A LAPAROSCOPIC ABDOMINAL PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE IN 2021 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE SUTURE GOT DETACHED FROM THE NEEDLE THREE TIMES. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 11623044 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 6, 2021Material Separation; Material Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A LAPAROSCOPIC ABDOMINAL PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE IN 2021 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE SUTURE GOT DETACHED FROM THE NEEDLE THREE TIMES. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 11623035 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 6, 2021Material Separation; Material Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A LAPAROSCOPIC PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2021 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE SUTURE GOT DETACHED FROM THE NEEDLE. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 11622946 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under K050845, K201996. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-2149-2024 · May 10, 2024 · Open, Classified
    MONOCRYL Plus Antibacterial (poliglecaprone 25) Suture - Intended for use in general soft tissue approximation and/or ligation where an absorbable material is indicated. PRODUCT CO
  • Z-1312-2009 · Feb 2, 2009 · Terminated
    MONOCRYL Plus Antibacterial (poliglecaprone 25) Suture; Ethicon, Inc., A Johnson & Johnson Company, Somerville, NJ Sutures are intended for general soft tissue approximation and/o

Other SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID devices

All SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page