MONOCRYL MCP315HRecalls & reported problems
Ethicon, LLC · Antibacterial Violet Monofilament (Poliglecaprone 25), Absorbable Surgical Suture · Class 2 · Implant
All models of MONOCRYL (127)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 11
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 11 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10705031046351), received between Apr 6, 2021 and Apr 15, 2026 — classified as 11 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Separation” (9 reports).
2 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K050845, K201996); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Material Separation9
- Break2
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions11
Recent adverse event reports
The 11 most recent of 11 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionApr 15, 2026Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2026 SUTURE WAS USED. THE NURSE ADVISED THAT THE TIP BROKE OFF THE NEEDLE DURING SUTURING OF THE URETER. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24888650 ↗MalfunctionMar 17, 2026Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. IT WAS REPORTED BY THE DISTRIBUTOR THAT NEEDLES ARE DEFECTED. LAST 3 TIME THE NEEDLE COMES APART FROM THE SUTURE. NO ADVERSE IMPACT WAS REPORTED. DEVICE IS AVAILABLE FOR RETURN. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24619305 ↗MalfunctionMar 17, 2026Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. IT WAS REPORTED BY THE DISTRIBUTOR THAT NEEDLES ARE DEFECTED. LAST 3 TIME THE NEEDLE COMES APART FROM THE SUTURE. NO ADVERSE IMPACT WAS REPORTED. DEVICE IS AVAILABLE FOR RETURN. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24619304 ↗MalfunctionMar 17, 2026Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. IT WAS REPORTED BY THE DISTRIBUTOR THAT NEEDLES ARE DEFECTED. LAST 3 TIME THE NEEDLE COMES APART FROM THE SUTURE. NO ADVERSE IMPACT WAS REPORTED. DEVICE IS AVAILABLE FOR RETURN. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24619298 ↗MalfunctionMar 17, 2026Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. IT WAS REPORTED BY THE DISTRIBUTOR THAT NEEDLES ARE DEFECTED. LAST 3 TIME THE NEEDLE COMES APART FROM THE SUTURE. NO ADVERSE IMPACT WAS REPORTED. DEVICE IS AVAILABLE FOR RETURN. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24619296 ↗MalfunctionFeb 5, 2025Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2023 AND SUTURE WAS USED. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE NEEDLE DISASSEMBLED. THERE WERE NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21315157 ↗MalfunctionOct 22, 2024Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE IN (B)(6) 2024 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE SUTURE IS BROKEN WHILE USING. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20505755 ↗MalfunctionApr 6, 2021Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A LAPAROSCOPIC ABDOMINAL PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE IN 2021 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE SUTURE GOT DETACHED FROM THE NEEDLE THREE TIMES. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11623046 ↗MalfunctionApr 6, 2021Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A LAPAROSCOPIC ABDOMINAL PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE IN 2021 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE SUTURE GOT DETACHED FROM THE NEEDLE THREE TIMES. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11623044 ↗MalfunctionApr 6, 2021Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A LAPAROSCOPIC ABDOMINAL PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE IN 2021 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE SUTURE GOT DETACHED FROM THE NEEDLE THREE TIMES. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11623035 ↗MalfunctionApr 6, 2021Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A LAPAROSCOPIC PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2021 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE SUTURE GOT DETACHED FROM THE NEEDLE. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11622946 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under K050845, K201996. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-2149-2024 · May 10, 2024 · Open, ClassifiedMONOCRYL Plus Antibacterial (poliglecaprone 25) Suture - Intended for use in general soft tissue approximation and/or ligation where an absorbable material is indicated. PRODUCT CO
- Z-1312-2009 · Feb 2, 2009 · TerminatedMONOCRYL Plus Antibacterial (poliglecaprone 25) Suture; Ethicon, Inc., A Johnson & Johnson Company, Somerville, NJ Sutures are intended for general soft tissue approximation and/o
Other SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID devices
- Coated VICRYL VCP433HEthicon, LLC · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID1 death1,093 reports
- Polysorb CL-915Covidien LP · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID503 reports
- Coated VICRYL VCP493HEthicon, LLC · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID435 reports
- V-Loc 180 VLOCL0316Covidien LP · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID1 recall376 reports
- Coated VICRYL VCP345HEthicon, LLC · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID1 death405 reports
- V-Loc 180 VLOCL0604Covidien LP · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID1 recall328 reports
- V-Loc 180 VLOCA008LCovidien LP · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID1 recall294 reports
- V-Loc 180 VLOCL0326Covidien LP · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID330 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page