Skip to content

MONOCRYL MCP946HRecalls & reported problems

Ethicon, LLC · Antibacterial Undyed Monofilament (Poliglecaprone 25), Absorbable Surgical Suture · Class 2 · Implant

All models of MONOCRYL (127)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
9
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 9 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10705031046801), received between Nov 16, 2021 and Apr 17, 2026 — classified as 2 injuries, 7 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Contaminated During Manufacture or Shipping” (4 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 3 reportsApr 2026: 2 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520263
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device Contaminated During Manufacture or Shipping4
  • Material Separation3
  • Break1
  • Material Integrity Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions7
  • Abscess2
  • Unspecified Infection2
  • Pocket Erosion1

Recent adverse event reports

The 9 most recent of 9 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionApr 17, 2026Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2026 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, DR COMPLAINED THAT THE MONOCRYL 0 SUTURE (CODE: MCP946H) BROKE EASILY WHEN HE WAS PULLING IT DURING SUTURING. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24911520 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 7, 2026Device Contaminated During Manufacture or Shipping

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A TOTAL HIP PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2026 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING SURGERY THE SURGICAL TECH OPEN THE PRODUCT ON THE BACKFIELD AND THERE IS A BLACK DEBRIS ON THE INSIDE OF THE PACKAGING. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24808636 ↗
  • InjuryMar 26, 2026Device Contaminated During Manufacture or Shipping

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. THE PATIENT DEVELOPED AN INFECTION AND ABSCESS. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Abscess; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 24705890 ↗
  • InjuryMar 26, 2026Device Contaminated During Manufacture or Shipping

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. THE PATIENT DEVELOPED AN INFECTION AND ABSCESS. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Abscess; Pocket Erosion; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 24705887 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 26, 2026Device Contaminated During Manufacture or Shipping

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. BLACK DEBRIS WAS FOUND UPON OPENING THE PACKAGE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24705886 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 6, 2023Material Integrity Problem; Material Integrity Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6)2023 AND SUTURE WAS USED. BEFORE USE ON THE PATIENT, IT WAS REPORTED BY THE SALES REP THAT DURING AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE WHEN THEY OPENED THE PACKAGE THE SUTURE WAS NOT ATTACHED TO THE NEEDLE. A NEW SUTURE WAS USED TO COMPETE THE CASE WITH NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES. ISUAL INSPECTION WAS CONDUCTED ON THE RETURNED DEVICE. THE RETURNED SAMPLE REVEALED THAT IT WAS RECEIVED, ONE DETACHED NEEDLE AND SUTURE INTO WINDING FORMER THAT PERTAIN TO PRODUCT CODE MCP946H. AFTER INVESTIGATION OF THE SAMPLE, SHORT INSERTION WAS OBSERVED IN THE STRAND. THE VISUAL INSPECTION CONCLUDED THAT THE COMBINATION OF THE NEEDLE/SUTURE WAS DETACHED FROM THE NEEDLE SINCE THE INSERTION END OF THE SUTURE DID NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17269433 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 16, 2021Material Separation; Material Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT C-SECTION ON UNKNOWN DATE AND THE SUTURE WAS USED. DURING SUTURING, THE SUTURE WOULD BREAK/ SEPARATED AWAY FROM THE NEEDLE, WHEN SLIGHT TENSION WAS APPLIED. ANOTHER LIKE SUTURE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12820575 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 16, 2021Material Separation; Material Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT C-SECTION ON UNKNOWN DATE AND THE SUTURE WAS USED. DURING SUTURING, THE SUTURE WOULD BREAK/SEPARATED AWAY FROM THE NEEDLE, WHEN SLIGHT TENSION WAS APPLIED. ANOTHER LIKE SUTURE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12820567 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 16, 2021Material Separation; Material Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT C-SECTION ON UNKNOWN DATE AND THE SUTURE WAS USED. DURING SUTURING, THE SUTURE WOULD BREAK/SEPARATED AWAY FROM THE NEEDLE, WHEN SLIGHT TENSION WAS APPLIED. ANOTHER LIKE SUTURE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12820565 ↗

Other SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID devices

All SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page