Coated VICRYL VCP304H (UDI 10705031052116)Recalls & reported problems
Ethicon, LLC · Antibacterial Violet Braided (Polyglactin 910), Synthetic Absorbable Suture · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Coated VICRYL (350)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
Quick summary
This Ethicon Coated VICRYL suture has 94 reports, 7 of them injuries, and no deaths. Common reports describe the suture breaking or separating from its needle, and a few describe wound infections after skin procedures, with a clinic asking whether the batch was a factor. No recalls name this device.
AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.
- Adverse event reports
- 96
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 7
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 96 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10705031052116), received between Oct 3, 2018 and Sep 29, 2026 — classified as 7 injuries, 89 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Separation” (52 reports).
2 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K032420, K132580, K181652); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Material Separation52
- Break36
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem7
- Tear, Rip or Hole in Device Packaging3
- Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1
- Device Contaminated During Manufacture or Shipping1
- Device Markings/Labelling Problem1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions74
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient17
- Blood Loss3
- Not Applicable3
- Unspecified Infection3
- Erythema1
- Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding1
- Inflammation1
Recent adverse event reports
The 25 most recent of 96 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionSep 29, 2026Material Separation
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50931023 ↗MalfunctionAug 18, 2026Break
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50299062 ↗MalfunctionAug 6, 2026Break
It was reported that a patient underwent an unknown procedure on (b)(6) 2026 and suture was used. In the surgical procedure without specifying the doctor requests the suture to be able to perform the closure, however at the time that the nurse gives the needles and the doctor takes it, it breaks, so he requests another one to be able to continue. the second one is given, and it breaks again when the third suture is passed, it breaks again validating that it is the same batch, so they make the product report. There was a 15 minute surgical delay reported. There was no patient consequences reported. Additional information was requested.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50157494 ↗InjuryJun 22, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A DERMATOLOGIC PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2026 AND SUTURE WAS USED. THE PATIENT RETURNED TO THE CLINIC WITH A SURGICAL SITE INFECTION. SINCE THIS RATE IS MUCH HIGHER THAT THE NORMAL PERCENTAGE OF PATIENTS WITH AN SSI THE HCP QUESTIONS IF THERE WAS A DIFFERENCE IN THE BATCH OF SUTURES USED. BESIDES, SHE MENTIONED THAT THE PATIENTS WITH SSI WERE ELDERLY WITH LARGE WOUNDS, WHICH MIGHT ALSO EXPLAIN THE HIGHTENED SSI PERCENTAGE. LOT NUMBER THOUGHT TO BE XCBBWHC0 (HOWEVER NOT CERTAIN). ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 25581352 ↗InjuryJun 22, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A DERMATOLOGIC PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) OR (B)(6) 2026 AND SUTURE WAS USED. THE PATIENT RETURNED TO THE CLINIC WITH A SURGICAL SITE INFECTION. SINCE THIS RATE IS MUCH HIGHER THAT THE NORMAL PERCENTAGE OF PATIENTS WITH AN SSI THE HCP QUESTIONS IF THERE WAS A DIFFERENCE IN THE BATCH OF SUTURES USED. BESIDES, SHE MENTIONED THAT THE PATIENTS WITH SSI WERE ELDERLY WITH LARGE WOUNDS, WHICH MIGHT ALSO EXPLAIN THE HIGHTENED SSI PERCENTAGE. LOT NUMBER THOUGHT TO BE XCBBWHC0 (HOWEVER NOT CERTAIN). ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 25581283 ↗InjuryJun 22, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A DERMATOLOGIC PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) OR (B)(6) 2026 AND SUTURE WAS USED. THE PATIENT RETURNED TO THE CLINIC WITH A SURGICAL SITE INFECTION. SINCE THIS RATE IS MUCH HIGHER THAT THE NORMAL PERCENTAGE OF PATIENTS WITH AN SSI THE HCP QUESTIONS IF THERE WAS A DIFFERENCE IN THE BATCH OF SUTURES USED. BESIDES, SHE MENTIONED THAT THE PATIENTS WITH SSI WERE ELDERLY WITH LARGE WOUNDS, WHICH MIGHT ALSO EXPLAIN THE HIGHTENED SSI PERCENTAGE. LOT NUMBER THOUGHT TO BE XCBBWHC0 (HOWEVER NOT CERTAIN). ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 25581273 ↗MalfunctionMay 4, 2026Device Markings/Labelling Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON 20/04/2026 AND SUTURE WAS USED. BEFORE USE, CUSTOMERS HAVE REPORTED THAT THE QRQODE ON OUR PRODUCT PACKAGING IS BLURRY AND CANNOT BE SCANNED. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25069511 ↗MalfunctionApr 23, 2026Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2026 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE SUTURING OF THE PATIENT¿S SOFT TISSUES, THE NEEDLE DETACHED FROM THE THREAD. A NEW BLISTER WAS OPENED. THE WOUND WAS CLOSED USING ANOTHER SUTURE MATERIAL. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24971438 ↗MalfunctionApr 23, 2026Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2026 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE SUTURING OF THE PATIENT¿S SOFT TISSUES, THE NEEDLE DETACHED FROM THE THREAD. A NEW BLISTER WAS OPENED. THE WOUND WAS CLOSED USING ANOTHER SUTURE MATERIAL. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24971368 ↗MalfunctionApr 15, 2026Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) /2026 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE SUTURE BREAKS AS SOON AS IT IS PULLED. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24889455 ↗MalfunctionApr 13, 2026Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN SURGERY ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, IT WAS REPORTED BY A SALES REP THAT, DURING AN UNKNOWN SURGERY, THE SUTURE WAS DETACHED FROM THE NEEDLE EASILY. IT WAS NOT A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. ANOTHER PRODUCT WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. WHEN WE SEND THE SAMPLE TO YOU, WE WILL LET YOU KNOW ITS RETURN DATE AND TRACKING NUMBER. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. FURTHER DETAILS ARE NOT PROVIDED FROM THE HP. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24862581 ↗MalfunctionApr 7, 2026Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING SURGERY, THE NEEDLE HAD BEEN DETACHED FROM THE SUTURE. IT WAS NOT A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. ANOTHER PRODUCT WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24800468 ↗MalfunctionFeb 24, 2026Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2026 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE SUTURING OF THE PATIENT¿S SOFT TISSUES, THE NEEDLE DETACHED FROM THE THREAD. A NEW BLISTER WAS OPENED. THE WOUND WAS CLOSED USING ANOTHER SUTURE MATERIAL. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24434925 ↗MalfunctionFeb 24, 2026Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2026 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE SUTURING OF THE PATIENT¿S SOFT TISSUES, THE NEEDLE DETACHED FROM THE THREAD. A NEW BLISTER WAS OPENED. THE WOUND WAS CLOSED USING ANOTHER SUTURE MATERIAL. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24434923 ↗MalfunctionSep 10, 2025Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2025 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE SUTURE WAS BROKEN WHEN THE SURGEON ATTEMPTED TO SEW THE TISSUE. CHANGED TO ANOTHER ONE TO COMPLETE THE SURGERY. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION COULD BE PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23016855 ↗MalfunctionAug 29, 2025Break; Material Separation; Break; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2025 AND SUTURE WAS USED. PRIOR TO USE ON THE PATIENT, THE SUTURE PULLED OFF THE NEEDLE. CHANGED TO ANOTHER ONE TO COMPLETE THE SURGERY. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. UPON EVALUATION OF THE RETURNED DEVICE, THE NEEDLE WAS FOUND BROKEN. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22922677 ↗MalfunctionAug 28, 2025Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2025 AND SUTURE WAS USED. THE DOCTOR SUTURED THE CHILD WITH SUTURE. THE PROBLEM OF PULLING OFF SUTURE NEEDLE HAPPENED WHEN SUTURING. OTHER SUTURE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE SUTURE FOR THE CHILD. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22914356 ↗MalfunctionMay 5, 2025Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2025 AND SUTURE WAS USED. IT WAS REPORTED THAT A SUTURE PRESENTED A DEFECT DURING USE - THE NEEDLE CAME LOOSE FROM THE THREAD. 05 THREADS THAT PRESENTED THE SAME PROBLEM WERE USED. THERE WERE NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21959580 ↗MalfunctionMay 5, 2025Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2025 AND SUTURE WAS USED. IT WAS REPORTED THAT A SUTURE PRESENTED A DEFECT DURING USE - THE NEEDLE CAME LOOSE FROM THE THREAD. 05 THREADS THAT PRESENTED THE SAME PROBLEM WERE USED. THERE WERE NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21959576 ↗MalfunctionMay 5, 2025Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2025 AND SUTURE WAS USED. IT WAS REPORTED THAT A SUTURE PRESENTED A DEFECT DURING USE - THE NEEDLE CAME LOOSE FROM THE THREAD. 05 THREADS THAT PRESENTED THE SAME PROBLEM WERE USED. THERE WERE NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21959573 ↗MalfunctionMay 5, 2025Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2025 AND SUTURE WAS USED. IT WAS REPORTED THAT A SUTURE PRESENTED A DEFECT DURING USE - THE NEEDLE CAME LOOSE FROM THE THREAD. 05 THREADS THAT PRESENTED THE SAME PROBLEM WERE USED. THERE WERE NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21959539 ↗MalfunctionMay 5, 2025Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2025 AND SUTURE WAS USED. IT WAS REPORTED THAT A SUTURE PRESENTED A DEFECT DURING USE, THE NEEDLE CAME LOOSE FROM THE THREAD. 05 THREADS THAT PRESENTED THE SAME PROBLEM WERE USED. THERE WERE NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21959536 ↗MalfunctionApr 30, 2025Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A LAPAROSCOPIC URETEROLITHOTOMY SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2025 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT SURGERY ON THE MORNING. DURING THE LAPAROSCOPIC URETEROLITHOTOMY SURGERY, WHEN THE SURGEON WAS SUTURING THE SKIN, THE TAIL OF THE NEEDLE SUDDENLY BROKE, AND THE SURGERY WAS IMMEDIATELY STOPPED. AFTER TWO PEOPLE CHECKED, IT WAS CONFIRMED THAT THE NEEDLE BODY WAS COMPLETE. IMMEDIATELY REPLACED THE SUTURE WITH A NEW ONE FOR SUTURING AND USED NORMALLY. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21936317 ↗MalfunctionMar 24, 2025Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
IT WAS REPORTED FROM THE ANALYSIS OF THE RETURNED PRODUCT THAT CONFIRMED COUNTERFEIT WAS OBSERVED. IT WAS REPORTED ON (B)(6)2024 THAT THE DISTRIBUTOR DENTAL GANA NOTIFIED THAT THESE CODIGS AND LOTS WERE SOLD TO A CUSTOMER IN CHILE BY A COMPANY THAT WE DO NOT HAVE IDENTIFIED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21681533 ↗MalfunctionMar 21, 2025Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A HERNIA SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2025 AND SUTURE WAS USED. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SUTURE WAS BROKEN WHEN THE SURGEON ATTEMPTED TO SEW THE TISSUE. CHANGED ANOTHER ONE TO COMPLETE THE HERNIA SURGERY. THERE WERE NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION COULD BE PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21664434 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under K032420, K132580, K181652. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-2145-2024 · May 10, 2024 · Open, ClassifiedVICRYL Plus Antibacterial (polyglactin 910) Suture - Indicated for use in general soft tissue approximation and/or ligation, except for ophthalmic, cardiovascular and neurological
- Z-1310-2009 · Feb 2, 2009 · TerminatedCoated VICRYL Plus Antibacterial (polyglactin 910) Suture; Ethicon Inc., A Johnson & Johnson Company, Somerville, NJ Sutures are intended for general soft tissue approximation and
Other SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID devices
- Coated VICRYL VCP433HEthicon, LLC · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID1 death1,093 reports
- Polysorb CL-915Covidien LP · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID503 reports
- Coated VICRYL VCP493HEthicon, LLC · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID435 reports
- V-Loc 180 VLOCL0316Covidien LP · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID1 recall376 reports
- Coated VICRYL VCP345HEthicon, LLC · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID1 death405 reports
- V-Loc 180 VLOCL0604Covidien LP · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID1 recall328 reports
- V-Loc 180 VLOCA008LCovidien LP · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID1 recall294 reports
- V-Loc 180 VLOCL0326Covidien LP · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID330 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page