Coated VICRYL VCP398H (UDI 10705031052987)Recalls & reported problems
Ethicon Inc. · Antibacterial Violet Braided (Polyglactin 910), Synthetic Absorbable Suture · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Coated VICRYL (114)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 18
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 18 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10705031052987), received between Mar 7, 2018 and Jan 14, 2026 — classified as 18 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Separation” (16 reports).
2 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K032420, K132580, K181652); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Material Separation16
- Break2
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions16
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2
Recent adverse event reports
The 18 most recent of 18 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJan 14, 2026Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN ANIMAL UNDERWENT A CAT OOPHORECTOMY PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. WHEN SUTURING THE ABDOMINAL WALL, AFTER 2 OR 3 TISSUE PASSAGES AND WITHOUT EXERTING EXCESSIVE PRESSURE, THE NEEDLE PULLED OFF THE THREAD. THIS PROBLEM OCCURRED ON TWO VICRYL PLUS SUTURES, ON TWO OOPHORECTOMIES OF DIFFERENT CATS. THE SURGERIES WERE COMPLETED BY USING ANOTHER DEVICE WITHOUT ANY INCIDENCE ON THE ANIMALS. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24075254 ↗MalfunctionJan 14, 2026Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN ANIMAL UNDERWENT A CAT OOPHORECTOMY PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. WHEN SUTURING THE ABDOMINAL WALL, AFTER 2 OR 3 TISSUE PASSAGES AND WITHOUT EXERTING EXCESSIVE PRESSURE, THE NEEDLE PULLED OFF THE THREAD. THIS PROBLEM OCCURRED ON 2 VICRYL PLUS VCP398H, ON TWO OOPHORECTOMIES OF DIFFERENT CATS. THE SURGERIES WERE COMPLETED BY USING ANOTHER DEVICE WITHOUT ANY INCIDENCE ON THE ANIMALS. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24075237 ↗MalfunctionDec 19, 2025Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A CAT UNDERWENT AN OOPHORECTOMY (BILATERAL) PROCEDURE IN (B)(6) 2025 AND SUTURE WAS USED. WHEN THE VETERINARIAN MADE THE LIGATIONS OF THE 2 OVARIES, WITHOUT EXERTING EXCESSIVE TENSION, THE NEEDLE DETACHED FROM THE THREAD. THE SURGERY COULD BE PERFORMED USING ANOTHER THREAD FROM THE SAME BOX WITHOUT AFFECTING THE CAT TO DATE.NO FURTHER INFORMATION AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23850095 ↗MalfunctionFeb 10, 2023Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN ANIMAL UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. THE NEEDLE PULLED OFF DURING TISSUE PASSAGE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETE SUCCESSFULLY. THERE WERE NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16351821 ↗MalfunctionDec 20, 2022Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN ANIMAL UNDERWENT AN OOPHORECTOMY PROCEDURE IN (B)(6) 2022 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE OVERLOCK OF THE ABDOMINAL WALL, AFTER A FEW TISSUE PASSAGES AND WITHOUT EXERTING EXCESSIVE PRESSURE, THE NEEDLE PULLED OFF FROM THE THREAD. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING A NEW DEVICE, WITHOUT AFFECTING THE ANIMAL. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16018947 ↗MalfunctionDec 20, 2022Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN ANIMAL UNDERWENT AN OOPHORECTOMY PROCEDURE IN NOVEMBER 2022 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE OVERLOCK OF THE ABDOMINAL WALL, AFTER A FEW TISSUE PASSAGES AND WITHOUT EXERTING EXCESSIVE PRESSURE, THE NEEDLE PULLED OFF FROM THE THREAD. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING A NEW DEVICE, WITHOUT AFFECTING THE ANIMAL. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16017044 ↗MalfunctionDec 20, 2022Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN ANIMAL UNDERWENT AN OOPHORECTOMY PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2022 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE OVERLOCK OF THE ABDOMINAL WALL, AFTER A FEW TISSUE PASSAGES AND WITHOUT EXERTING EXCESSIVE PRESSURE, THE NEEDLE PULLED OFF FROM THE THREAD. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING A NEW DEVICE, WITHOUT AFFECTING THE ANIMAL. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16017039 ↗MalfunctionDec 20, 2022Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN ANIMAL UNDERWENT AN OOPHORECTOMY PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2022 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE OVERLOCK OF THE ABDOMINAL WALL, AFTER A FEW TISSUE PASSAGES AND WITHOUT EXERTING EXCESSIVE PRESSURE, THE NEEDLE PULLED OFF FROM THE THREAD. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING A NEW DEVICE, WITHOUT AFFECTING THE ANIMAL. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16016865 ↗MalfunctionJul 26, 2022Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE IN 2022 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE SUTURE CANNOT BE USED BECAUSE AT THE FIRST STEP ON THE TISSUE THE NEEDLE DETACHED FROM THE WIRE THE STITCH HAS BEEN PULLED OUT AND A NEW ONE ENTERED. THIS CAUSE A SLIGHT DELAY. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15108871 ↗MalfunctionJul 26, 2022Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE IN 2022 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE SUTURE CANNOT BE USED BECAUSE AT THE FIRST STEP ON THE TISSUE THE NEEDLE DETACHED FROM THE WIRE THE STITCH HAS BEEN PULLED OUT AND A NEW ONE ENTERED. THIS CAUSE A SLIGHT DELAY. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15108774 ↗MalfunctionJul 26, 2022Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE IN 2022 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE SUTURE CANNOT BE USED BECAUSE AT THE FIRST STEP ON THE TISSUE THE NEEDLE DETACHED FROM THE WIRE THE STITCH HAS BEEN PULLED OUT AND A NEW ONE ENTERED. THIS CAUSE A SLIGHT DELAY. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15108742 ↗MalfunctionJul 26, 2022Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2022 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE SUTURE CANNOT BE USED BECAUSE AT THE FIRST STEP ON THE TISSUE THE NEEDLE DETACHED FROM THE WIRE THE STITCH HAS BEEN PULLED OUT AND A NEW ONE ENTERED. THIS CAUSE A SLIGHT DELAY. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15108528 ↗MalfunctionJun 10, 2022Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN ANIMAL UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE NEEDLE PULLED OFF THE THREAD. NO INFORMATION REGARDING THE NUMBER OF IMPACTED UNITS. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 14653322 ↗MalfunctionJun 10, 2022Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN ANIMAL UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE NEEDLE PULLED OFF THE THREAD. NO INFORMATION REGARDING THE NUMBER OF IMPACTED UNITS. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 14653317 ↗MalfunctionMay 23, 2022Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN ANIMAL UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2022 AND SUTURE WAS USED. THE NEEDLE DETACHED FROM THE SUTURE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 14475543 ↗MalfunctionMay 3, 2022Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND BARBED SUTURE WAS USED. IT WAS MENTIONED THAT THE NEEDLE CAME LOOSE. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 14269600 ↗MalfunctionMar 7, 2018Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED BY THE VET THAT AN ANIMAL UNDERWENT AN OOPHORECTOMY PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. THREE OR FOUR DAYS POST OP THE VET NOTED A RUPTURE OF THE ABDOMINAL WALL SUTURE. THE KNOTS WERE INTACT. THE ANIMAL HAD A NEW SURGERY FOR EVENTRATION.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7321011 ↗MalfunctionMar 7, 2018Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED BY THE VET THAT AN ANIMAL UNDERWENT AN OOPHORECTOMY PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. THREE OR FOUR DAYS POST OP THE VET NOTED A RUPTURE OF THE ABDOMINAL WALL SUTURE. THE KNOTS WERE INTACT. THE ANIMAL HAD A NEW SURGERY FOR EVENTRATION.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7320911 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under K032420, K132580, K181652. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-2145-2024 · May 10, 2024 · Open, ClassifiedVICRYL Plus Antibacterial (polyglactin 910) Suture - Indicated for use in general soft tissue approximation and/or ligation, except for ophthalmic, cardiovascular and neurological
- Z-1310-2009 · Feb 2, 2009 · TerminatedCoated VICRYL Plus Antibacterial (polyglactin 910) Suture; Ethicon Inc., A Johnson & Johnson Company, Somerville, NJ Sutures are intended for general soft tissue approximation and
Other SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID devices
- Coated VICRYL VCP433HEthicon, LLC · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID1 death1,093 reports
- Polysorb CL-915Covidien LP · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID503 reports
- Coated VICRYL VCP493HEthicon, LLC · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID435 reports
- V-Loc 180 VLOCL0316Covidien LP · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID1 recall376 reports
- Coated VICRYL VCP345HEthicon, LLC · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID1 death405 reports
- V-Loc 180 VLOCL0604Covidien LP · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID1 recall328 reports
- V-Loc 180 VLOCA008LCovidien LP · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID1 recall294 reports
- V-Loc 180 VLOCL0326Covidien LP · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID330 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page