Skip to content

Coated VICRYL VCP497H (UDI 10705031053823)Recalls & reported problems

Ethicon, LLC · Antibacterial Undyed Braided (Polyglactin 910), Synthetic Absorbable Suture · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Coated VICRYL (350)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
11
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
7
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 11 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10705031053823), received between Jun 7, 2018 and Dec 12, 2024 — classified as 7 injuries, 4 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Separation” (9 reports).

2 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K032420, K132580, K181652); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 1 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Material Separation9
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem6
  • Break1
  • Extrusion1

Patient problems

  • Wound Dehiscence6
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient3
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • No Code Available1
  • Not Applicable1

Recent adverse event reports

The 11 most recent of 11 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionDec 12, 2024Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A TLIF PROCEDURE IN 2024 AND SUTURE WAS USED. A NEEDLE TIP BROKE OFF OF THE NEEDLE. PROCEDURE WAS STOPPED AND X RAY WAS DONE TO FIND NEEDLE TIP. NEEDLE TIP WAS RECOVERED BUT NOT SAVED PER THE CUSTOMER. THERE WAS NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED WITH A DELAY OF FIVE TO TEN MINUTES. DEVICE WAS NOT RETURNING. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20918240 ↗
  • InjuryJul 24, 2023Material Separation; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Material Separation; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE NEEDLE CAME OFF THE SUTURE CAUSING A DEHISCENCE ON THE PATIENT (FACE, LIPS, MOUTH). THE SURGERY WAS DELAYED BY 30 MINUTES. IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE INITIAL PROCEDURE, ¿THE PATIENT HAD TO HAVE SURGERY AGAIN¿. THIS EVENT WAS REPORTED TO HAVE OCCURRED INTRAOPERATIVELY. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Wound Dehiscence

    MAUDE report 17385138 ↗
  • InjuryJul 24, 2023Material Separation; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Material Separation; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE NEEDLE CAME OFF THE SUTURE CAUSING A DEHISCENCE ON THE PATIENT (FACE, LIPS, MOUTH). THE SURGERY WAS DELAYED BY 30 MINUTES. IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE INITIAL PROCEDURE, ¿THE PATIENT HAD TO HAVE SURGERY AGAIN¿. THIS EVENT WAS REPORTED TO HAVE OCCURRED INTRAOPERATIVELY. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Wound Dehiscence

    MAUDE report 17385075 ↗
  • InjuryJul 24, 2023Material Separation; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Material Separation; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE NEEDLE CAME OFF THE SUTURE CAUSING A DEHISCENCE ON THE PATIENT (FACE, LIPS, MOUTH). THE SURGERY WAS DELAYED BY 30 MINUTES. IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE INITIAL PROCEDURE, ¿THE PATIENT HAD TO HAVE SURGERY AGAIN¿. THIS EVENT WAS REPORTED TO HAVE OCCURRED INTRAOPERATIVELY. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Wound Dehiscence

    MAUDE report 17385073 ↗
  • InjuryJul 24, 2023Material Separation; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Material Separation; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE NEEDLE CAME OFF THE SUTURE CAUSING A DEHISCENCE ON THE PATIENT (FACE, LIPS, MOUTH). THE SURGERY WAS DELAYED BY 30 MINUTES. IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE INITIAL PROCEDURE, ¿THE PATIENT HAD TO HAVE SURGERY AGAIN¿. THIS EVENT WAS REPORTED TO HAVE OCCURRED INTRAOPERATIVELY. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Wound Dehiscence

    MAUDE report 17385053 ↗
  • InjuryJul 24, 2023Material Separation; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Material Separation; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE NEEDLE CAME OFF THE SUTURE CAUSING A DEHISCENCE ON THE PATIENT (FACE, LIPS, MOUTH). THE SURGERY WAS DELAYED BY 30 MINUTES. IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE INITIAL PROCEDURE, ¿THE PATIENT HAD TO HAVE SURGERY AGAIN¿. THIS EVENT WAS REPORTED TO HAVE OCCURRED INTRAOPERATIVELY. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Wound Dehiscence

    MAUDE report 17385044 ↗
  • InjuryJul 24, 2023Material Separation; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Material Separation; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE NEEDLE CAME OFF THE SUTURE CAUSING A DEHISCENCE ON THE PATIENT (FACE, LIPS, MOUTH). THE SURGERY WAS DELAYED BY 30 MINUTES. IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE INITIAL PROCEDURE, ¿THE PATIENT HAD TO HAVE SURGERY AGAIN¿. THIS EVENT WAS REPORTED TO HAVE OCCURRED INTRAOPERATIVELY. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Wound Dehiscence

    MAUDE report 17385035 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 12, 2019Material Separation; Material Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2019 AND SUTURE WAS USED. THE SURGEON WAS HAVING ISSUES WITH SUTURE BREAKING AT THE SWAGE DURING SURGERY. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER DEVICE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 9457512 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 12, 2019Material Separation; Material Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2019 AND SUTURE WAS USED. THE SURGEON WAS HAVING ISSUES WITH SUTURE BREAKING AT THE SWAGE DURING SURGERY. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER DEVICE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 9457498 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 12, 2019Material Separation; Material Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2019 AND SUTURE WAS USED. THE SURGEON WAS HAVING ISSUES WITH SUTURE BREAKING AT THE SWAGE DURING SURGERY. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER DEVICE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 9457494 ↗
  • InjuryJun 7, 2018Extrusion

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT CESAREAN SECTION ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED TO SEW THE SUBCUTANEOUS TISSUE. FOLLOWING THE PROCEDURE, THE SUTURE THREAD CAME OUT FROM THE SKIN. THE PATIENT MAY HAVE GONE TO THE HOSPITAL TO CUT SUTURE THROUGH. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Code Available; Not Applicable

    MAUDE report 7580738 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under K032420, K132580, K181652. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-2145-2024 · May 10, 2024 · Open, Classified
    VICRYL Plus Antibacterial (polyglactin 910) Suture - Indicated for use in general soft tissue approximation and/or ligation, except for ophthalmic, cardiovascular and neurological
  • Z-1310-2009 · Feb 2, 2009 · Terminated
    Coated VICRYL Plus Antibacterial (polyglactin 910) Suture; Ethicon Inc., A Johnson & Johnson Company, Somerville, NJ Sutures are intended for general soft tissue approximation and

Other SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID devices

All SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page