MONOCRYL Y527HRecalls & reported problems
Ethicon, LLC · Violet Monofilament (Poliglecaprone 25), Absorbable Surgical Suture · Class 2 · Implant
All models of MONOCRYL (127)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 20
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 20 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10705031059450), received between Dec 20, 2017 and May 20, 2026 — classified as 20 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Separation” (10 reports).
2 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K960653); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Material Separation10
- Break8
- Detachment Of Device Component1
- Tear, Rip or Hole in Device Packaging1
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient11
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions9
Recent adverse event reports
The 20 most recent of 20 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMay 20, 2026Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A GASTRECTOMY PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2026 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, IT WAS REPORTED BY A SALES REP THAT, DURING A LAPAROSCOPIC GASTRECTOMY, IT WAS FOUND THAT THE NEEDLE HAD BEEN DETACHED FROM THE SUTURE AFTER THE PRODUCT WAS INSERTED INTO THE BODY THROUGH A 10MM PORT. THE DOCTOR COMMENTED IT MIGHT BE A PROBLEM WITH THE ANGLE OF INSERTION. THERE WAS NO EFFECT ON THE PATIENT. IT WAS NOT A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. ANOTHER PRODUCT WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. WHEN WE SEND THE SAMPLE TO YOU, WE WILL LET YOU KNOW ITS RETURN DATE AND TRACKING NUMBER. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. FURTHER DETAILS ARE NOT PROVIDED FROM THE HP. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25233042 ↗MalfunctionOct 29, 2025Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING AN UNKNOWN SURGERY, THE SUTURE WAS BROKEN DURING USE, AND EVEN WHEN A NEW ONE IS USED, IT WAS BROKEN EASILY WITH LITTLE FORCE. IT WAS NOT A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. ANOTHER PRODUCT WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23417680 ↗MalfunctionOct 29, 2025Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING AN UNKNOWN SURGERY, THE SUTURE WAS BROKEN DURING USE, AND EVEN WHEN A NEW ONE IS USED, IT WAS BROKEN EASILY WITH LITTLE FORCE. IT WAS NOT A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. ANOTHER PRODUCT WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23417679 ↗MalfunctionJun 23, 2025Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A LAPAROSCOPY-ASSISTED DISTAL GASTRECTOMY PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2025 AND A SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE THE NEEDLE HAD BEEN DETACHED FROM THE SUTURE. THIS EVENT WAS FOUND BEFORE USE. IT WAS NOT A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. THE PRODUCT WAS USED FOR REINFORCEMENT. ANOTHER PRODUCT WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22311846 ↗MalfunctionMay 1, 2025Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2025 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE SUTURE WAS DETACHED FROM THE NEEDLE EASILY. IT WAS NOT A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. ANOTHER PRODUCT WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. FURTHER DETAILS ARE NOT PROVIDED FROM THE HP. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21944681 ↗MalfunctionApr 28, 2023Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2023 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE NEEDLE WAS DETACHED FROM THE SUTURE. IT WAS NOT A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16837416 ↗MalfunctionApr 28, 2023Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2023 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE NEEDLE WAS DETACHED FROM THE SUTURE. IT WAS NOT A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16837389 ↗MalfunctionApr 28, 2023Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2023 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE NEEDLE WAS DETACHED FROM THE SUTURE. IT WAS NOT A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16837347 ↗MalfunctionMay 4, 2022Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE (B)(6) 2022 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE NEEDLE GOT DETACHED FROM THE SUTURE EASILY. IT WAS NOT A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 14282700 ↗MalfunctionJul 6, 2020Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A TRANSABDOMINAL PREPERITONEAL PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2020; AND A SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE SUTURE DETACHED FROM THE NEEDLE EASILY DURING PERITONEAL SUTURING. IT WAS NOT A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 10232793 ↗MalfunctionDec 24, 2018Tear, Rip or Hole in Device Packaging; Tear, Rip or Hole in Device Packaging
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND A SUTURE WAS USED. DURING SURGERY, IT WAS FOUND THAT THE SUTURE HAD BEEN DETACHED FROM THE NEEDLE. IT WAS NOT A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8194523 ↗MalfunctionAug 22, 2018Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2018 AND SUTURE WAS USED. THE SUTURE WAS DETACHED FROM THE NEEDLE DURING USE. FURTHER DETAILS ARE NOT PROVIDED. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7804847 ↗MalfunctionAug 2, 2018Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A AN UNKNOWN LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2018 AND SUTURE WAS USED. THE SUTURE WAS DETACHED FROM THE NEEDLE DURING USE. IT WAS NOT A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7742944 ↗MalfunctionAug 1, 2018Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A LAPAROSCOPIC DISTAL GASTRECTOMY ON (B)(6) 2018 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE NEEDLE WAS BROKEN AT THE MIDDLE PART WHEN HOLDING THE NEEDLE BY NEEDLE-HOLDER. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7739625 ↗MalfunctionJul 2, 2018Detachment Of Device Component; Detachment Of Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2018 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE SUTURE DETACHED FROM THE NEEDLE. IT WAS NOT A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7657460 ↗MalfunctionApr 10, 2018Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A LAPAROSCOPIC DISTAL GASTRECTOMY PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2018 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE NEEDLE WAS BROKEN AT THE MIDDLE PART WHILE ANASTOMOSING THE BOWEL. THE BROKEN PIECE OF THE NEEDLE WAS RETRIEVED. THE SURGEON COMMENTED THAT HIS WAY OF SUTURING WAS AS USUAL. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7416336 ↗MalfunctionFeb 26, 2018Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A LAPAROSCOPIC DISTAL GASTRECTOMY ON (B)(6) 2018 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE NEEDLE BROKE AROUND THE SWAGE PART. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7295837 ↗MalfunctionFeb 26, 2018Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A LAPAROSCOPIC DISTAL GASTRECTOMY ON (B)(6) 2018 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE NEEDLE BROKE AROUND THE SWAGE PART. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7295821 ↗MalfunctionFeb 26, 2018Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A LAPAROSCOPIC DISTAL GASTRECTOMY ON (B)(6) 2018 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE NEEDLE BROKE AROUND THE SWAGE PART. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7295818 ↗MalfunctionDec 20, 2017Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING USE, THE NEEDLE WAS BROKEN. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7135278 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under K960653. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-2148-2024 · May 10, 2024 · Open, ClassifiedMONOCRYL (poliglecaprone 25) Suture - Intended for use in general soft tissue approximation and/or ligation where an absorbable material is indicated PRODUCT CODE: Y315H Y345
- Z-1311-2009 · Feb 2, 2009 · TerminatedMONOCRYL (poliglecaprone 25 ) Suture, Ethicon Inc., A Johnson & Johnson Company, Somerville, NJ Sutures are intended for general soft tissue approximation and/or ligation.
Other SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID devices
- Coated VICRYL VCP433HEthicon, LLC · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID1 death1,093 reports
- Polysorb CL-915Covidien LP · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID503 reports
- Coated VICRYL VCP493HEthicon, LLC · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID435 reports
- V-Loc 180 VLOCL0316Covidien LP · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID1 recall376 reports
- Coated VICRYL VCP345HEthicon, LLC · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID1 death405 reports
- V-Loc 180 VLOCL0604Covidien LP · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID1 recall328 reports
- V-Loc 180 VLOCA008LCovidien LP · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID1 recall294 reports
- V-Loc 180 VLOCL0326Covidien LP · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID330 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page