Skip to content

Stratafix Spiral SXMD1B406Recalls & reported problems

Surgical Specialties México, S. de R.L. de C.V. · SH 0 MONODERM 20CM · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Stratafix Spiral (24)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10705031228030), received between Jun 22, 2023 and Nov 15, 2024 — classified as 2 injuries, 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (4 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 1 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 1 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Detachment of Device or Device Component4
  • Device Appears to Trigger Rejection1

Patient problems

  • Foreign Body In Patient4
  • Granuloma1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionNov 15, 2024Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    AS PER DISTRIBUTOR THE NEEDLE BROKE DURING THE SURGICAL PROCEDURE. THE BROKEN NEEDLE WAS RETRIEVED FROM THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 20695493 ↗
  • InjuryApr 10, 2024Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    DURING THE PROCESS OF CLOSING THE SURGICAL INCISION FASCIA LAYER AFTER SURGERY, THE NEEDLE BODY BROKE, AND THE BROKEN END OF THE NEEDLE BODY BOUNCED AND WAS UNABLE TO BE LOCATED. THE SUTURE SEWN ON THE FASCIA WAS STILL CONNECTED TO SOME OF THE NEEDLE BODY. THIS LEAD TO THE USE OF VARIOUS METHODS SUCH AS THE C-ARM DURING SURGERY TO LOCATE THE NEEDLE BODY, POSING A SIGNIFICANT RISK OF FOREIGN BODY RESIDUE DURING SURGERY.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 19082310 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 8, 2023Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    IT WAS INITIALLY REPORTED THAT THERE WAS A PROBLEM WITH THE NEEDLE PULLING FREE FROM THE SUTURE DURING THE SURGERY. CHANGED TO ANOTHER ONE TO COMPLETE THE SURGERY WITHOUT INCIDENT. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF PATIENT INJURY, DELAY OR INTERVENTION. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM OUR DISTRIBUTOR ON (B)(6) 2023 INDICATED DURING THE PROCESS OF REPAIRING A GASTRIC PERFORATION FOR THE PATIENT, THE NEEDLE BROKE IN THE PATIENT''S STOMACH. DUE TO TIMELY TREATMENT BY THE DOCTOR, THE REMAINING NEEDLE WAS COMPLETELY REMOVED FROM THE STOMACH WITHOUT INJURY OR DELAY."

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 17892728 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 28, 2023Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    THE HEALTH AUTHORITY REPORTED TO OUR DISTRIBUTOR. DURING THE PROCESS OF REPAIRING A GASTRIC PERFORATION FOR THE PATIENT, THE NEEDLE BROKE IN THE PATIENT''S STOMACH. DUE TO TIMELY TREATMENT BY THE DOCTOR, THE REMAINING NEEDLE WAS COMPLETELY REMOVED FROM THE STOMACH.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 17836004 ↗
  • InjuryJun 22, 2023Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    THE HEALTH AUTHORITY REPORTED TO OUR DISTRIBUTOR AFTER THE PATIENT WAS ADMITTED TO THE HOSPITAL AND COMPLETED THE RELEVANT AUXILIARY EXAMINATIONS, HE RECEIVED SURGERY. AFTER THE SURGERY, THE DOCTOR GAVE THE PATIENT ANTI INFECTION, DETUMESCENCE AND PAIN RELIEF, PREVENTION OF DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS AND SYMPTOMATIC TREATMENT. AFTER THE SURGERY, THE WOUND DRESSING WAS STRENGTHENED. AFTER THE SURGERY, THE PATIENT'S DRESSING WAS REMOVED AND DRESSING WAS CHANGED, AND THE RED AND SWELLING OF THE LOWER PART OF THE RIGHT THIGH WERE SIGNIFICANTLY RELIEVED, AND THE TOUCH PAIN WAS LESS THAN BEFORE. THE SURGICAL OPENING OF THE FRONT SIDE OF THE RIGHT THIGH WAS RED, SWOLLEN, TENDER, AND A LITTLE OOZING. THE REST OF THE SURGICAL OPENING WAS NORMAL, THE PATIENT''S REJECTION AND ADVERSE REACTIONS TO SUTURE. CONTINUE TO PROVIDE PATIENTS WITH ANTI-INFECTION, SWELLING REDUCTION, PAIN RELIEF, AND SYMPTOMATIC SUPPORT TREATMENT, AND STRENGTHEN DRESSING CHANGES AT THE SURGICAL SITE.

    Patient problems: Granuloma

    MAUDE report 17184156 ↗

Other SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID devices

All SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page