STRATAFIX SXMP1B417Recalls & reported problems
Ethicon, LLC · Knotless Tissue Control Device, Undyed Unidirectional (Antibacterial) Synthetic Absorbable Device · Class 2 · Implant
All models of STRATAFIX (181)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 4
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 3
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10705031236332), received between Jan 18, 2019 and Jul 27, 2022 — classified as 3 injuries, 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
- Break1
Patient problems
- Not Applicable3
- Wound Dehiscence2
- Erythema1
- Inflammation1
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
- Swelling1
- Unspecified Infection1
Recent adverse event reports
The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJul 27, 2022Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2022 AND BARBED SUTURE WAS USED. DURING WOUND CLOSURE A 2-0 STRATAFIX SUTURE BROKE. DUE TO THE NATURE OF THE BARBED SUTURE AND THE DIRECTION OF THE SURGEON, CLOSURE WAS SUSPENDED. PA REMOVED THE 2-0 AND 0 STRATAFIX, AS WELL THE 0 VICRYL FROM THE WOUND. WOUND CLOSURE WAS RESUMED UTILIZING 0 VICRYL, 2-0 VICRYL, 3-0 MONOCRYL AND 3-0 NYLON. THIS ADDED APPROXIMATELY 20 MINUTES TO THE CASE. SUTURE ACTUALLY BROKE WHEN PATIENT WAS ABOUT 2/3 OF THE WAY CLOSED. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SUTURE BROKE SOMEWHERE NEAR THE END. A SUTURE PASS WAS MADE AND WHEN PULLED OUT, IT BROKE. MINIMAL TENSION APPLIED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15116801 ↗InjuryAug 28, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND BARBED SUTURE WAS USED. FOLLOWING THE PROCEDURE, THE SURGEON NOTED PATIENT HAD REDNESS, SWELLING AND GENERAL UNWELL LOOKING INCISION. IT WAS REPORTED SUSPECTED INFECTION AND PATIENT WAS ADMITTED TO CARE FACILITY AND NOT SEEMING TO RESPOND TO ANTIBIOTICS. THE SURGEON OPINED ISSUE IS WITH INCISION AND PATIENT HAS HAD REDNESS SINCE DAY ONE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.
Patient problems: Erythema; Inflammation; Not Applicable; Swelling; Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 10464946 ↗InjuryJan 21, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A TOTAL KNEE PROCEDURE ON UNKNOWN DATE IN (B)(6) 2018 AND BARBED SUTURE WAS USED TO CLOSE THE OUTER LAYER OF SKIN TISSUE. THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED WOUND DEHISCENCE TWO WEEKS POST PROCEDURE. A SECOND PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED ON AN UNKNOWN DATE TO CLOSE THE WOUND WITH UNKNOWN SUTURE. THE PATIENT CURRENT STATUS IS REPORTED AS DISCHARGED AND IS DOING FINE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.
Patient problems: Not Applicable; Wound Dehiscence
MAUDE report 8264792 ↗InjuryJan 18, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A TOTAL KNEE PROCEDURE ON UNKNOWN DATE IN (B)(6) 2018 AND BARBED SUTURE WAS USED TO CLOSE THE OUTER LAYER OF SKIN TISSUE. THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED WOUND DEHISCENCE TWO WEEKS POST PROCEDURE. A SECOND PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED ON AN UNKNOWN DATE TO CLOSE THE WOUND WITH UNKNOWN SUTURE. THE PATIENT CURRENT STATUS IS REPORTED AS DISCHARGED AND FINE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.
Patient problems: Not Applicable; Wound Dehiscence
MAUDE report 8262554 ↗
Other SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID devices
- Coated VICRYL VCP433HEthicon, LLC · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID1 death1,093 reports
- Polysorb CL-915Covidien LP · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID503 reports
- Coated VICRYL VCP493HEthicon, LLC · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID435 reports
- V-Loc 180 VLOCL0316Covidien LP · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID1 recall376 reports
- Coated VICRYL VCP345HEthicon, LLC · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID1 death405 reports
- V-Loc 180 VLOCL0604Covidien LP · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID1 recall328 reports
- V-Loc 180 VLOCA008LCovidien LP · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID1 recall294 reports
- V-Loc 180 VLOCL0326Covidien LP · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID330 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page