Skip to content

STRATAFIX SXMP1B435Recalls & reported problems

Ethicon, LLC · Knotless Tissue Control Device, Undyed Unidirectional (Antibacterial) Synthetic Absorbable Device · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
6
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10705031236462), received between Jan 4, 2018 and Feb 6, 2018 — classified as 6 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure To Adhere Or Bond” (6 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Failure To Adhere Or Bond6
  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available3

Patient problems

  • Wound Dehiscence6
  • No Code Available5
  • Reaction3
  • Not Applicable1

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryFeb 6, 2018Failure To Adhere Or Bond; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Failure To Adhere Or Bond; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT HAND SURGEON ON (B)(6) 2017 AND BARBED SUTURE WAS USED ON SUBCUTANEOUS TISSUE AND SKIN. POST OPERATIVELY, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED WOUND DEHISCENCE WITHIN 3 WEEKS OF THE PROCEDURE. THE SURGEON REPORTED THE DEVICE LOST FIXATION STRENGTH. THE SURGEON OPINED THAT THE COATING ON SUTURES LED TO POOR FIXATION AND WHAT SEEMED TO BE A REACTION AND RELEASE OF HEALING TISSUE. AN ADDITIONAL PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED TO RE-APPROXIMATE THE WOUND ON AN UNKNOWN DATE WITH A DIFFERENT SUTURE TYPE. THE PATIENT IS REPORTED AS FINE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WILL BE REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Not Applicable; Reaction; Wound Dehiscence

    MAUDE report 7243801 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 6, 2018Failure To Adhere Or Bond; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Failure To Adhere Or Bond; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT HAND SURGEON ON (B)(6) 2017 AND BARBED SUTURE WAS USED ON SUBCUTANEOUS TISSUE AND SKIN. POST OPERATIVELY, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED WOUND DEHISCENCE WITHIN 3 WEEKS OF THE PROCEDURE. THE SURGEON REPORTED THE DEVICE LOST FIXATION STRENGTH. THE SURGEON OPINED THAT THE COATING ON SUTURES LED TO POOR FIXATION AND WHAT SEEMED TO BE A REACTION AND RELEASE OF HEALING TISSUE. AN ADDITIONAL PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED TO RE-APPROXIMATE THE WOUND ON AN UNKNOWN DATE WITH A DIFFERENT SUTURE TYPE. THE PATIENT IS REPORTED AS FINE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Code Available; Reaction; Wound Dehiscence

    MAUDE report 7243742 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 6, 2018Failure To Adhere Or Bond; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Failure To Adhere Or Bond; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT HAND SURGEON ON (B)(6) 2017 AND BARBED SUTURE WAS USED ON SUBCUTANEOUS TISSUE AND SKIN. POST OPERATIVELY, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED WOUND DEHISCENCE WITHIN 3 WEEKS OF THE PROCEDURE. THE SURGEON REPORTED THE DEVICE LOST FIXATION STRENGTH. THE SURGEON OPINED THAT THE COATING ON SUTURES LED TO POOR FIXATION AND WHAT SEEMED TO BE A REACTION AND RELEASE OF HEALING TISSUE. AN ADDITIONAL PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED TO RE-APPROXIMATE THE WOUND ON AN UNKNOWN DATE WITH A DIFFERENT SUTURE TYPE. THE PATIENT IS REPORTED AS FINE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Code Available; Reaction; Wound Dehiscence

    MAUDE report 7243705 ↗
  • InjuryJan 8, 2018Failure To Adhere Or Bond; Failure To Adhere Or Bond

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A VASCULAR PROCEDURE ON UNKNOWN DATE AND BARBED SUTURE WAS USED. POST-OPERATIVELY, THE DEVICE LOST FIXATION STRENGTH AND THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED WOUND DEHISCENCE. AN ADDITIONAL PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED TO RE-APPROXIMATE THE WOUND WITH A DIFFERENT TYPE OF SUTURE. THE PATIENT IS REPORTED AS FINE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Code Available; Wound Dehiscence

    MAUDE report 7171569 ↗
  • InjuryJan 8, 2018Failure To Adhere Or Bond; Failure To Adhere Or Bond

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A VASCULAR PROCEDURE ON UNKNOWN DATE AND BARBED SUTURE WAS USED. POST-OPERATIVELY, THE DEVICE LOST FIXATION STRENGTH AND THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED WOUND DEHISCENCE. AN ADDITIONAL PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED TO RE-APPROXIMATE THE WOUND WITH A DIFFERENT TYPE OF SUTURE. THE PATIENT IS REPORTED AS FINE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Code Available; Wound Dehiscence

    MAUDE report 7171527 ↗
  • InjuryJan 4, 2018Failure To Adhere Or Bond; Failure To Adhere Or Bond

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A VASCULAR PROCEDURE ON UNKNOWN DATE AND BARBED SUTURE WAS USED. POST-OPERATIVELY, THE DEVICE LOST FIXATION STRENGTH AND THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED WOUND DEHISCENCE. AN ADDITIONAL PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED TO RE-APPROXIMATE THE WOUND WITH A DIFFERENT TYPE OF SUTURE. THE PATIENT IS REPORTED AS FINE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Code Available; Wound Dehiscence

    MAUDE report 7166403 ↗

Other SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID devices

All SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page