Skip to content

STRATAFIX SXMP1B108Recalls & reported problems

Ethicon, LLC · Knotless Tissue Control Device, Undyed Unidirectional (Antibacterial) Synthetic Absorbable Device · Class 2 · Implant

All models of STRATAFIX (181)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
13
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
6
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 13 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10705031236646), received between Nov 1, 2019 and Aug 24, 2026 — classified as 6 injuries, 7 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Tear, Rip or Hole in Device Packaging” (4 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 1 reportsAug 2025: 1 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 1 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 2 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem4
  • Tear, Rip or Hole in Device Packaging4
  • Break3
  • Material Separation1
  • Positioning Failure1

Patient problems

  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient4
  • Wound Dehiscence4
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
  • Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction1
  • Insufficient Information1
  • Swelling/ Edema1

Recent adverse event reports

The 13 most recent of 13 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionAug 24, 2026Material Separation

    It was reported that a patient underwent a Total Knee Arthroplasty on (b)(6) 2026 and barbed suture was used. It was reported that orthopedic surgeon at this account was finishing a total knee arthroplasty. Surgeon approximated the skin-subcuticular layer with Stratafix Monocryl. The first suture he used, the needle popped off, and the second suture he used, the suture pulled through the fixation loop when he buried the first stitch. To clarify, the fixation loop seemed to break open when pulled taught. First time he has seen this happen. No delay or patient consequences was reported. No additional information was requested.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50407400 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 24, 2026Break

    It was reported that a patient underwent a Total Knee Arthroplasty on (b)(4) 2026 and barbed suture was used. It was reported that orthopedic surgeon at this account was finishing a total knee arthroplasty. Surgeon approximated the skin-subcuticular layer with Stratafix Monocryl. The first suture he used, the needle popped off, and the second suture he used, the suture pulled through the fixation loop when he buried the first stitch. To clarify, the fixation loop seemed to break open when pulled taught. First time he has seen this happen. No delay or patient consequences was reported. No additional information was requested.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50407398 ↗
  • InjuryOct 21, 2025Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A PROCEDURE FOR PLATE REMOVAL AND SCAR REVERSION FROM A LEFT PROXIMAL HUMERUS FRACTURE SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2025 AND A BARBED SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, AT THE TIME OF CLOSING THE INCISION, THE PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT (PA) NOTICED THAT THE TIP OF THE NEEDLE WAS MISSING. FROM X-RAY, THE RADIOLOGIST SAW A 1.3MM TIP OF THE NEEDLE IN THE LATERAL SOFT TISSUE OF THE PROXIMAL ARM. THE PATIENT HAD TO RETURN TO THE OPERATING ROOM TO GET THE NEEDLE TIP REMOVED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 23346932 ↗
  • InjuryAug 12, 2025Positioning Failure; Positioning Failure

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2025 AND BARBED SUTURE WAS USED. THE SURGEON FELT THAT THE BARBS DID NOT PRONOUNCE AS MUCH AS OTHER SUTURES UTILIZED BEFORE OF THE SAME CODE. THE PATIENT HAD A WOUND DEHISCENCE AND WAS RE-SUTURED WITH A DIFFERENT SUTURE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Wound Dehiscence

    MAUDE report 22789173 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 7, 2025Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY (TKA) PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2025 AND BARBED SUTURE WAS USED. TIP OF THE BARBED SUTURE BROKE OFF DURING SURGEON¿S CLOSURE OF SKIN. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22416989 ↗
  • InjuryAug 15, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED A PATIENT UNDERWENT A TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND BARBED SUTURE WAS USED. FOUND WOUND DEHISCENCE IN SUBCUTICULAR LAYER AFTER 1 MONTH WHEN PATIENT CAME TO PHYSICAL THERAPY. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Wound Dehiscence

    MAUDE report 17553218 ↗
  • InjuryAug 15, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED A PATIENT UNDERWENT A TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND BARBED SUTURE WAS USED. FOUND WOUND DEHISCENCE IN SUBCUTICULAR LAYER AFTER 1 MONTH WHEN PATIENT CAME TO PHYSICAL THERAPY. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Wound Dehiscence

    MAUDE report 17553138 ↗
  • InjurySep 26, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A TARSAL TUNNEL PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND A BARBED SUTURE WAS USED. ABOUT FOUR DAYS AFTER THE PROCEDURE, THE WOUND TO OPEN UP AND THE BARBED SUTURE TORE THE SKIN IN THE PROCESS. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT IS OKAY AND CAME BACK INTO THE CLINIC WITH THE SAME SURGEON. THE SURGEON REAPPROXIMATED THE WOUND WITH BARBED SUTURE AND PROVIDED MORE IN-DEPTH WOUND CARE EDUCATION. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Wound Dehiscence

    MAUDE report 15485407 ↗
  • InjurySep 23, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND BARBED SUTURE WAS USED FOR SOFT TISSUE CLOSURE. THE PATIENT HAS HAD PROTRACTED SWELLING AROUND THE OPERATION SITE AND DISTALLY. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction; Swelling/ Edema

    MAUDE report 15473712 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 1, 2019Tear, Rip or Hole in Device Packaging; Tear, Rip or Hole in Device Packaging

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. THE PACKAGING INTERIOR FOIL WAS RIPPED UP AND AFFECTED STERILITY. THE PRODUCT WAS NOT USED. THERE WERE NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 9265628 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 1, 2019Tear, Rip or Hole in Device Packaging; Tear, Rip or Hole in Device Packaging

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. THE PACKAGING INTERIOR FOIL WAS RIPPED UP AND AFFECTED STERILITY. THE PRODUCT WAS NOT USED. THERE WERE NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 9265624 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 1, 2019Tear, Rip or Hole in Device Packaging; Tear, Rip or Hole in Device Packaging

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. THE PACKAGING INTERIOR FOIL WAS RIPPED UP AND AFFECTED STERILITY. THE PRODUCT WAS NOT USED. THERE WERE NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 9265623 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 1, 2019Tear, Rip or Hole in Device Packaging; Tear, Rip or Hole in Device Packaging

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. THE PACKAGING INTERIOR FOIL WAS RIPPED UP AND AFFECTED STERILITY. THE PRODUCT WAS NOT USED. THERE WERE NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED..

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 9265622 ↗

Other SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID devices

All SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page