Skip to content

STRATAFIX SXMP2B407Recalls & reported problems

Ethicon, LLC · Stratafix (Spiral MONOCRYL Plus), Bidirectional · Class 2 · Implant

All models of STRATAFIX (181)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10705031464384), received between May 26, 2022 and Jul 31, 2026 — classified as 1 injury, 4 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).

1 other recall cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K192580); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 1 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 1 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 1 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Break1
  • Component Misassembled1
  • Material Separation1
  • Positioning Failure1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
  • Pocket Erosion1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJul 31, 2026Material Separation

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50098074 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 13, 2026Positioning Failure

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A VIDEO-ASSISTED THORACOSCOPIC SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2026 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, IT WAS REPORTED BY THE SALES REP THAT DURING A VIDEO-ASSISTED THORACOSCOPIC SURGERY, WHEN THE SURGEON WAS CLOSING, THE SUTURE WAS GLIDED THROUGH THE SKIN AND THE SUTURE BARBS WERE NOT THERE. THERE WAS ONLY A DELAY OF 1 MINUTE IN THE PROCEDURE. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25163032 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 15, 2023Component Misassembled; Component Misassembled

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE IN 2023 AND BARBED SUTURE WAS USED. BEFORE USE ON THE PATIENT, IT WAS REPORTED TO THE SALES REP THAT THE FACILITY ORDERED A BOX OF 4¿0 SUTURE. WHEN THEY OPENED THE BOX IT INCLUDED SOME 3¿0 SUTURE AS WELL AS 4-0 SUTURE. EIGHT DEVICES WILL BE RETURNED. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18336975 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 19, 2022Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN GENERAL PLASTIC COMBO PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND BARBED SUTURE WAS USED. IN THE MIDDLE OF SUTURING THE NEEDLE BROKE. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15632392 ↗
  • InjuryMay 26, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A THYROIDECTOMY PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND A BARBED SUTURE WAS USED. POST-OP, THE PATIENT CAME BACK FIVE DAYS LATER TO REPORT WHAT THEY THOUGHT WAS A WORM TRAVELING IN THEIR BODY FROM THEIR SHOULDER TO UPPER BACK TO LOWER BACK. THE PATIENT THEN WENT TO A DIFFERENT HOSPITAL, AND A DOCTOR REMOVED WHAT LOOKED LIKED THE DEVICE. IT WAS CONFIRMED THAT IT WAS A PIECE OF BARBED SUTURE THAT WAS REMOVED AND NOT A WORM. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED. THE PATIENT RECEIVED ANTIBIOTICS. THE CURRENT CONDITION OF THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED AS FINE, AND THE HEALING FROM THE SURGERY WHICH WENT WELL.

    Patient problems: Pocket Erosion

    MAUDE report 14517681 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under K192580. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-1533-2024 · Mar 8, 2024 · Open, Classified
    STRATAFIX Spiral MONOCRYL Plus Bidirectional Knotless Tissue Control Device: STRATAFIX SPIRAL MONOCRYL PLUS BI UD 12+12IN(30+30CM) USP3-0(M2) D/A PS PRM- Indicated for use in soft

Other SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID devices

All SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page