Skip to content

EXPEDIUM 187702635Recalls & reported problems

Depuy Spine, LLC · EXPEDIUM ANTERIOR SPINE SYSTEM MONOAXIAL SCREW 5.5 x 6 x 35mm · Class 2 · Implant

All models of EXPEDIUM (29)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10705034138572), received between Nov 21, 2017 and Nov 21, 2017 — classified as 3 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loose or Intermittent Connection” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Loose or Intermittent Connection3

Patient problems

  • Failure of Implant3
  • Injury3

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryNov 21, 2017Loose or Intermittent Connection; Loose or Intermittent Connection

    ON (B)(6) 2016, SURGERY FOR SCOLIOSIS WAS PERFORMED USING THE EXPEDIUM SYSTEM. THE FIXED AREA WAS T11 ¿ L4. RECENTLY, SURGEON CONFIRMED THROUGH AN X-RAY THAT SET SCREWS (PART#: UNK) FIXED AT CAUDAL END WERE LOOSENED AND THAT RODS HAD MOVED IN UPPER POSITION, RESULTING IN LOSS OF THE CORRECTIVE FORCE. THE SURGEON DECIDED TO CONDUCT RE-OPERATION NEXT WEEK BECAUSE SUCH LOOSENED SET SCREWS MIGHT CONTACT THE HEART OF THE PATIENT. HE WILL USE NON-J&J REPLACEMENTS AT THE RE-OPERATION SCHEDULED NEXT WEEK.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Injury

    MAUDE report 7049612 ↗
  • InjuryNov 21, 2017Loose or Intermittent Connection; Loose or Intermittent Connection

    ON(B)(6) 2016, SURGERY FOR SCOLIOSIS WAS PERFORMED USING THE EXPEDIUM SYSTEM. THE FIXED AREA WAS T11 ¿ L4. RECENTLY, SURGEON CONFIRMED THROUGH AN X-RAY THAT SET SCREWS (PART#: UNK) FIXED AT CAUDAL END WERE LOOSENED AND THAT RODS HAD MOVED IN UPPER POSITION, RESULTING IN LOSS OF THE CORRECTIVE FORCE. THE SURGEON DECIDED TO CONDUCT RE-OPERATION NEXT WEEK BECAUSE SUCH LOOSENED SET SCREWS MIGHT CONTACT THE HEART OF THE PATIENT. HE WILL USE NON-J&J REPLACEMENTS AT THE RE-OPERATION SCHEDULED NEXT WEEK.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Injury

    MAUDE report 7049486 ↗
  • InjuryNov 21, 2017Loose or Intermittent Connection; Loose or Intermittent Connection

    ON (B)(6) 2016, SURGERY FOR SCOLIOSIS WAS PERFORMED USING THE EXPEDIUM SYSTEM. THE FIXED AREA WAS T11 ¿ L4. RECENTLY, SURGEON CONFIRMED THROUGH AN X-RAY THAT SET SCREWS (PART#: UNK) FIXED AT CAUDAL END WERE LOOSENED AND THAT RODS HAD MOVED IN UPPER POSITION, RESULTING IN LOSS OF THE CORRECTIVE FORCE. THE SURGEON DECIDED TO CONDUCT RE-OPERATION NEXT WEEK BECAUSE SUCH LOOSENED SET SCREWS MIGHT CONTACT THE HEART OF THE PATIENT. HE WILL USE NON-J&J REPLACEMENTS AT THE RE-OPERATION SCHEDULED NEXT WEEK.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Injury

    MAUDE report 7049423 ↗

Other APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERVERTEBRAL BODY devices

All APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERVERTEBRAL BODY devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page