Skip to content

EXPEDIUM 286210010Recalls & reported problems

Medos International Sàrl · EXPEDIUM SPINE SYSTEM QUICK CONNECT SI POLY DRIVER · Class 1

All models of EXPEDIUM (291)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10705034211022), received between Mar 12, 2025 and Mar 30, 2026 — classified as 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device-Device Incompatibility” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 1 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 1 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device-Device Incompatibility2

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMar 30, 2026Device-Device Incompatibility

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A PROCEDURE THE SCREWDRIVER WAS NOT ENGAGING WITH THE SCREW HEAD, RESULTING IN THE DEVICE NOT PERFORMING AS REQUIRED. THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED WITH THE USE OF AN ALTERNATIVE DEVICE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24715964 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 12, 2025Device-Device Incompatibility; Device-Device Incompatibility

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SCREWDRIVER WAS NOT CAPTURING SCREWS PROPERLY DURING A SPINAL FUSION SURGERY. SURGERY WAS NOT DELAYED DUE TO THE EVENT AND WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED. A SECOND SCREWDRIVER WAS USED. THERE WAS NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21584746 ↗

Other SCREWDRIVER devices

All SCREWDRIVER devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page