VIPER 186727740Recalls & reported problems
Medos International Sàrl · VIPER SYSTEM FENESTRATED CORTICAL FIX POLYAXIAL SCREW 5.5 x 7 x 40mm · Class 2 · Implant
All models of VIPER (121)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 9
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 6
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 9 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10705034282664), received between Dec 4, 2018 and Mar 19, 2025 — classified as 6 injuries, 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (3 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break3
- Detachment of Device or Device Component2
- Disconnection2
- Loose or Intermittent Connection2
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Material Twisted/Bent1
- Migration or Expulsion of Device1
Patient problems
- No Code Available5
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2
- Unspecified Infection2
- Failure of Implant1
- Injury1
- Post Operative Wound Infection1
Recent adverse event reports
The 9 most recent of 9 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMar 19, 2025Detachment of Device or Device Component; Material Twisted/Bent; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Material Twisted/Bent
IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON AN UNKNOWN DATE, THERE WAS AN ISSUE WITH A SCREW. THE CORE OF THE SCREW WAS TWISTED. IT OCCURRED DURING THE PROCEDURE; THE INTERNAL TABS CAME APART, MAKING IT IMPOSSIBLE TO INSERT THE ROD. HOWEVER, THERE WAS NO ISSUE IN REMOVING THE SCREW AND REPLACING IT WITH ANOTHER ONE. THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED TO BE DOING WELL INITIALLY. SURGERY WAS NOT DELAYED DUE TO THE EVENT. THE SCREW WAS TAKEN OFF, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21644134 ↗InjuryJan 4, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THIS REPORT IS BEING FILED AFTER THE REVIEW OF A CLINICAL EVALUATION REPORT (CER) FROM A DATABASE RELATED RESEARCH ACTIVITY (DRRA): SPINE TANGO SOA REPORT - TLIF. THE FOLLOWING COMPLICATIONS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED: POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION SUPERFICIAL. COMPLICATION TIME/INTERVENTION. REPEAT SURGERY. THIS IS FOR DEPUY SYNTHES SPINE VIPER /OTHER AND VIPER CFX FENESTRATED (MIS TI CFX FEN POLY 7X40 (B)(4)).
Patient problems: Post Operative Wound Infection
MAUDE report 18447192 ↗MalfunctionNov 1, 2021Break; Break
DEVICE REPORT FROM SYNTHES REPORTS AN EVENT IN (B)(6) AS FOLLOWS: IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2021 DURING AN UNKNOWN SPINAL PROCEDURE, TWO (2) POLYAXIAL SCREWS BROKE DURING FINAL INSERTION. THE SCREW HEADS DETACHED FROM THE SHAFTS. THE SCREWS WERE REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT SUCCESSFULLY. THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED USING TWO REPLACEMENT SCREWS IN THE SAME POSITION WITHOUT ISSUE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCE. THERE WAS A SURGICAL DELAY OF TEN (10) MINUTES. THIS REPORT IS FOR ONE (1) VIPER SYSTEM FENESTRATED CORTICAL FIX POLYAXIAL SCREW 5.5 X 7 X 40MM. THIS IS REPORT 2 OF 2 FOR (B)(4).
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12728828 ↗InjuryDec 13, 2019Break; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Break; Detachment of Device or Device Component
THIS IS REPORT 3 OF 4 FOR (B)(4).
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; No Code Available
MAUDE report 9468836 ↗InjuryDec 13, 2019Break; Migration or Expulsion of Device; Break; Migration or Expulsion of Device
InjuryMay 17, 2019Loose or Intermittent Connection; Loose or Intermittent Connection
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT 1ST SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2018, FUSION L5-S1 WITH EXPEDIUM AND T-PAL. ON (B)(6) 2018, REVISION SURGERY BECAUSE OF RADICULOPATHY AND SUSPICION ON INFECTION. IMPLANTS WHERE LOOSE, HAVE BEEN REMOVED AND REPLACED. POST OP PAIN FREE. TISSUE HAS BEEN EXAMINED IN BACTERIOLOGY, ONE SAMPLE WAS POSITIVE. PATIENT SHOWED UP IN (B)(6) WITH BACK PAIN, EXAMINATIONS HAVE SHOWN AGAIN PSEUDARTHROSIS AND LOOSENING OF THE IMPLANTS. ON (B)(6), AGAIN REVISION SURGERY, REMOVAL OF ALL IMPLANTS, WHICH HAVE BEEN SENT IN FOR BACTERIOLOGICAL EXAMINATION. SEVERAL TISSUE SAMPLES WILL ALSO BE EXAMINED BACTERIOLOGICALLY. T-PAL CAGE WILL BE REMOVED FROM ANTERIOR AFTER THESE RESULTS OF THE BACTERIOLOGICAL EXAMINATION ARE KNOWN.
Patient problems: No Code Available; Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 8620995 ↗InjuryMay 17, 2019Loose or Intermittent Connection; Loose or Intermittent Connection
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT 1ST SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2018, FUSION L5-S1 WITH EXPEDIUM AND T-PAL. ON (B)(6) 2018, REVISION SURGERY BECAUSE OF RADICULOPATHY AND SUSPICION ON INFECTION. IMPLANTS WHERE LOOSE, HAVE BEEN REMOVED AND REPLACED. POST OP PAIN FREE. TISSUE HAS BEEN EXAMINED IN BACTERIOLOGY, ONE SAMPLE WAS POSITIVE. PATIENT SHOWED UP IN (B)(6) WITH BACK PAIN, EXAMINATIONS HAVE SHOWN AGAIN PSEUDARTHROSIS AND LOOSENING OF THE IMPLANTS. ON (B)(6), AGAIN REVISION SURGERY, REMOVAL OF ALL IMPLANTS, WHICH HAVE BEEN SENT IN FOR BACTERIOLOGICAL EXAMINATION. SEVERAL TISSUE SAMPLES WILL ALSO BE EXAMINED BACTERIOLOGICALLY. T-PAL CAGE WILL BE REMOVED FROM ANTERIOR AFTER THESE RESULTS OF THE BACTERIOLOGICAL EXAMINATION ARE KNOWN.
Patient problems: No Code Available; Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 8620934 ↗InjuryDec 21, 2018Disconnection; Disconnection
THE FOLLOWING WAS REPORTED: DEPUY 18-78. THE HEAD OF THE SCREW DISLOCATED DURING THE INSERTION. THE IMPLANT WAS REPLACED.
Patient problems: No Code Available; No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8189135 ↗MalfunctionDec 4, 2018Disconnection; Disconnection
THE FOLLOWING WAS REPORTED: DETACHMENT OF THE HEAD OF THE SCREW FROM THE STEM, WHEN SCREWING IN THE SCREW WITH THE HELP OF THE SCREWDRIVER.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8130088 ↗
Other ORTHOSIS, SPINAL PEDICLE FIXATION devices
- NA 04.614.508Synthes GmbH · ORTHOSIS, SPINAL PEDICLE FIXATION277 reports
- CREO 1134.0010Globus Medical, Inc. · ORTHOSIS, SPINAL PEDICLE FIXATION112 reports
- CREO 1119.0010Globus Medical, Inc. · ORTHOSIS, SPINAL PEDICLE FIXATION80 reports
- VIPER 186731745Medos International Sàrl · ORTHOSIS, SPINAL PEDICLE FIXATION43 reports
- CD HORIZON® Spinal System 1553201090Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · ORTHOSIS, SPINAL PEDICLE FIXATION38 reports
- EXPEDIUM 179902000Medos International Sàrl · ORTHOSIS, SPINAL PEDICLE FIXATION37 reports
- CD HORIZON® Spinal System 7540220Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · ORTHOSIS, SPINAL PEDICLE FIXATION36 reports
- EXPEDIUM VERSE 199721640Medos International Sàrl · ORTHOSIS, SPINAL PEDICLE FIXATION35 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page