VIPER 186727745Recalls & reported problems
Medos International Sàrl · VIPER SYSTEM FENESTRATED CORTICAL FIX POLYAXIAL SCREW 5.5 x 7 x 45mm · Class 2 · Implant
All models of VIPER (121)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 23
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 13
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 23 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10705034282671), received between Oct 1, 2018 and Apr 8, 2026 — classified as 13 injuries, 10 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (10 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break10
- Device Slipped6
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem5
- Device-Device Incompatibility3
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
- Disconnection1
- Entrapment of Device1
Patient problems
- Insufficient Information6
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions5
- Post Operative Wound Infection3
- Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available2
- Impaired Healing2
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient2
- Bone Fracture(s)1
- No Code Available1
Recent adverse event reports
The 23 most recent of 23 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionApr 8, 2026Device-Device Incompatibility
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A SCREW WOULDN´T COME LOOSE FROM THE SCREWDRIVER, RESULTING IN THE NEED TO USE A NEW SCREW AND SCREWDRIVER. THERE WAS A 5 MINUTES OF SURGICAL DELAY. THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24819470 ↗MalfunctionAug 9, 2024Device Slipped; Device Slipped
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED AND STATED THAT THERE WAS A 20-MINUTE SURGICAL DELAY. THERE WERE NO REPORTS OF PATIENT HARM AND SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 19955862 ↗InjuryJan 8, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
DEVICE REPORT FROM SYNTHES REPORTS AN EVENT IN SWITZERLAND AS FOLLOWS: THIS REPORT IS BEING FILED AFTER THE REVIEW OF A CLINICAL EVALUATION REPORT (CER) FROM A DATABASE RELATED RESEARCH ACTIVITY (DRRA): SPINE TANGO SOA REPORT - TLIF. THE FOLLOWING COMPLICATIONS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED: FRACTURE VERTEBRAL STRUCTURES, WOUND HEALING PROBLEM. COMPLICATION TIME/INTERVENTION. INTRAOPERATIVE, REPEAT SURGERY. THIS IS FOR DEPUY SYNTHES SPINE CONFIDENCE SPINAL CEMENT SYSTEM, VIPER /OTHER, VIPER CFX FENESTRATED AND VIPER INSTRUMENTS PRODUCTS. THIS IS REPORT 2 OF 6 FOR COMPLAINT: (B)(4).
Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s); Impaired Healing
MAUDE report 18464028 ↗InjuryJan 8, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THIS REPORT IS BEING FILED AFTER THE REVIEW OF A CLINICAL EVALUATION REPORT (CER) FROM A DATABASE RELATED RESEARCH ACTIVITY (DRRA): SPINE TANGO SOA REPORT - TLIF. THE FOLLOWING COMPLICATIONS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED: ADJACENT SEGMENT PATHOLOGY. COMPLICATION TIME/INTERVENTION. REPEAT SURGERY. THIS IS FOR DEPUY SYNTHES SPINE VIPER /OTHER AND VIPER CFX FENESTRATED PRODUCTS (MIS TI CFX FEN POLY 7X45 (B)(6).
Patient problems: Osteolysis
MAUDE report 18463643 ↗InjuryJan 8, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THIS REPORT IS BEING FILED AFTER THE REVIEW OF A CLINICAL EVALUATION REPORT (CER) FROM A DATABASE RELATED RESEARCH ACTIVITY (DRRA): SPINE TANGO SOA REPORT - TLIF. THE FOLLOWING COMPLICATIONS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED: WOUND INFECTION DEEP, POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION DEEP, POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION SUPERFICIAL, COMPLICATION TIME/INTERVENTION, POSTOPERATIVE (BEFORE DISCHARGE), REPEAT SURGERY. THIS IS FOR DEPUY SYNTHES SPINE VIPER /OTHER AND VIPER CFX FENESTRATED PRODUCTS (MIS TI CFX FEN POLY 7X45 (B)(4)).
Patient problems: Post Operative Wound Infection; Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 18463292 ↗InjuryJan 5, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
DEVICE REPORT FROM SYNTHES REPORTS AN EVENT IN SWITZERLAND AS FOLLOWS: THIS REPORT IS BEING FILED AFTER THE REVIEW OF A CLINICAL EVALUATION REPORT (CER) FROM A DATABASE RELATED RESEARCH ACTIVITY (DRRA): SPINE TANGO SOA REPORT - TLIF. THE FOLLOWING COMPLICATIONS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED: WOUND INFECTION DEEP, OTHER. COMPLICATION TIME/INTERVENTION. POSTOPERATIVE (BEFORE DISCHARGE), REPEAT SURGERY. THIS IS FOR DEPUY SYNTHES SPINE VIPER SYSTEM FENESTRATED CORTICAL FIX POLYAXIAL SCREW 5.5 X 7 X 45MM. THIS IS REPORT 2 OF 2 FOR (B)(4).
Patient problems: Insufficient Information; Post Operative Wound Infection
MAUDE report 18453567 ↗InjuryJan 5, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
DEVICE REPORT FROM SYNTHES REPORTS AN EVENT IN SWITZERLAND AS FOLLOWS: THIS REPORT IS BEING FILED AFTER THE REVIEW OF A CLINICAL EVALUATION REPORT (CER) FROM A DATABASE RELATED RESEARCH ACTIVITY (DRRA): SPINE TANGO SOA REPORT - TLIF THE FOLLOWING COMPLICATIONS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED: WOUND INFECTION DEEP, WOUND HEALING PROBLEM. COMPLICATION TIME/INTERVENTION POSTOPERATIVE (BEFORE DISCHARGE), REPEAT SURGERY THIS IS FOR DEPUY SYNTHES SPINE VIPER /OTHER AND VIPER CFX FENESTRATED PRODUCTS THIS IS REPORT 3 OF 3 FOR COMPLAINT (B)(4).
Patient problems: Impaired Healing; Post Operative Wound Infection
MAUDE report 18450197 ↗InjuryJul 28, 2023Break; Device Slipped; Break; Device Slipped
1ST/2ND (B)(6) 2022 (IMPLANTATION OF THE CFX/ILIUM SCREWS. A LOOSE SCREWDRIVER ATTACHMENT THAT REMAINED IN THE S1 SCREW DURING THE PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2022. FOR REVISION, PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH NO SURGICAL DELAY. NON-UNION AT L5/S1 WAS REPORTED. NO FRAGMENTS WERE LEFT BEHIND IN THE PATIENT DUE TO BROKEN SCREWS. INTERVENTION WAS REQUIRED TO REMOVE ALL FRAGMENTS. PATIENT STATUS WAS NOTED AS A DECREASE OF PAIN MEDICATION AND A DISCHARGE TO CONTEMPORARY NURSERY HOME NO FURTHER FOLLOW UP. FOR THIS COMPLAINT WE WILL BE REPORTING THE POST-OPERATIVE AND INTRA-OPERATIVE EVENT ON (B)(6). THE REPORTED SCREWS HAD MALFUNCTIONS DURING POST-OPERATIVE AND INTRA-OPERATIVE PHASES OF CARE.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 17412411 ↗InjuryJul 28, 2023Break; Device Slipped; Break; Device Slipped
ON (B)(6) 2022 (IMPLANTATION OF THE CFX/ILIUM SCREWS. A LOOSE SCREWDRIVER ATTACHMENT THAT REMAINED IN THE S1 SCREW DURING THE PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2022. FOR REVISION, PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH NO SURGICAL DELAY. NON-UNION AT L5/S1 WAS REPORTED. NO FRAGMENTS WERE LEFT BEHIND IN THE PATIENT DUE TO BROKEN SCREWS. INTERVENTION WAS REQUIRED TO REMOVE ALL FRAGMENTS. PATIENT STATUS WAS NOTED AS A DECREASE OF PAIN MEDICATION AND A DISCHARGE TO CONTEMPORARY NURSERY HOME NO FURTHER FOLLOW UP FOR THIS COMPLAINT WE WILL BE REPORTING THE POST-OPERATIVE AND INTRA-OPERATIVE EVENT ON (B)(4) . THE REPORTED SCREWS HAD MALFUNCTIONS DURING POST-OPERATIVE AND INTRA-OPERATIVE PHASES OF CARE.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 17412410 ↗InjuryJul 28, 2023Break; Device Slipped; Break; Device Slipped
(B)(6) 2022 (IMPLANTATION OF THE CFX/ILIUM SCREWS. A LOOSE SCREWDRIVER ATTACHMENT THAT REMAINED IN THE S1 SCREW DURING THE PROCEDURE ON (B)(6), 2022. FOR REVISION, PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH NO SURGICAL DELAY. NON-UNION AT L5/S1 WAS REPORTED. NO FRAGMENTS WERE LEFT BEHIND IN THE PATIENT DUE TO BROKEN SCREWS. INTERVENTION WAS REQUIRED TO REMOVE ALL FRAGMENTS. PATIENT STATUS WAS NOTED AS A DECREASE OF PAIN MEDICATION AND A DISCHARGE TO CONTEMPORARY NURSERY HOME NO FURTHER FOLLOW UP FOR THIS COMPLAINT WE WILL BE REPORTING THE POST-OPERATIVE AND INTRA-OPERATIVE EVENT ON (B)(4). THE REPORTED SCREWS HAD MALFUNCTIONS DURING POST-OPERATIVE AND INTRA-OPERATIVE PHASES OF CARE.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 17412409 ↗InjuryJul 28, 2023Break; Break
1ST/2ND: (B)(6) 2022, IMPLANTATION OF THE CFX/ILIUM SCREWS. A LOOSE SCREWDRIVER ATTACHMENT THAT REMAINED IN THE S1 SCREW, DURING THE PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2022. FOR REVISION, PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH NO SURGICAL DELAY. NON-UNION AT L5/S1 WAS REPORTED. NO FRAGMENTS WERE LEFT BEHIND IN THE PATIENT, DUE TO BROKEN SCREWS. INTERVENTION WAS REQUIRED TO REMOVE ALL FRAGMENTS. PATIENT STATUS WAS NOTED, AS A DECREASE OF PAIN MEDICATION. AND A DISCHARGE TO CONTEMPORARY NURSERY HOME. NO FURTHER FOLLOW UP FOR THIS COMPLAINT, WE WILL BE REPORTING THE POST-OPERATIVE AND INTRA-OPERATIVE EVENT ON (B)(4). THE REPORTED, SCREWS HAD MALFUNCTIONS, DURING POST-OPERATIVE AND INTRA-OPERATIVE PHASES OF CARE.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 17412406 ↗MalfunctionJul 10, 2023Device Slipped; Device Slipped
THE OPERATION, WAS A SPINOPELVIC STABILIZATION PROCEDURE WITH CFX SCREWS. AFTER INSERTING THE ROD INTO THE SCREW HEADS, THE SURGEON ATTEMPTED TO FIX IT WITH SET SCREWS. AND THE MONO-INNIE TIGHTENED WITHOUT PROBLEMS. HOWEVER, WHEN RE-TIGHTENING WITH THE TORQUE LIMITER, THE INNIE OVERTIGHTENED, LEAVING IT LOOSE AGAIN. THE SURGEON CHANGED TO THE ILIUM SCREW, BECAUSE THE SCREW HEAD WAS NO LONGER STABLE. IT WAS RE-ATTEMPTED WITH A NEW CFX SCREW, BUT THE SAME RESULT OCCURRED. THE PROCEDURE WAS ABLE TO BE COMPLETED USING AN EXPEDIUM POLYAXIAL SCREW WITH A DOUBLE INNIE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17286743 ↗InjuryJun 9, 2022Device-Device Incompatibility; Device-Device Incompatibility
DEVICE REPORT FROM DEPUY SYNTHES REPORTS AN EVENT IN (B)(6) AS FOLLOWS: IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2022 TWO (2) OUT OF FOUR (4) SCREWS COULD NOT BE REMOVED AND HAD TO BE DRILLED LABORIOUSLY. IT WAS NOT POSSIBLE TO FIT THE SCREWDRIVER INTO THOSE TWO SCREWS. THERE WAS ABOUT NINETY (90) MINUTES OF SURGICAL DELAY DUE TO THE REPORTED EVENT. THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED. THIS REPORT IS FOR ONE (1) MIS TI CFX FEN POLY 7X45 THIS IS REPORT 2 OF 2 FOR COMPLAINT (B)(4).
Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available
MAUDE report 14641349 ↗InjuryJun 9, 2022Device-Device Incompatibility; Device-Device Incompatibility
DEVICE REPORT FROM DEPUY SYNTHES REPORTS AN EVENT IN (B)(6) AS FOLLOWS: IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2022 TWO (2) OUT OF FOUR (4) SCREWS COULD NOT BE REMOVED AND HAD TO BE DRILLED LABORIOUSLY. IT WAS NOT POSSIBLE TO FIT THE SCREWDRIVER INTO THOSE TWO SCREWS. THERE WAS ABOUT NINETY (90) MINUTES OF SURGICAL DELAY DUE TO THE REPORTED EVENT. THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED. THIS REPORT IS FOR ONE (1) MIS TI CFX FEN POLY 7X45. THIS IS REPORT 1 OF 2 FOR COMPLAINT (B)(4).
Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available
MAUDE report 14641348 ↗MalfunctionDec 28, 2021Device Slipped; Device Slipped
DEVICE REPORT FROM SYNTHES REPORTS AN EVENT IN (B)(6) AS FOLLOWS: IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2021, AN OSTEOPOROTIC PATIENT UNDERWENT FOR CEMENT AUGMENTATION. THIS WAS AN MIS PROCEDURE AND VCFFS SCREWS USED. DURING SCREW INSERTION, 2-SCREW HEAD BRAKED AND COME OUT ON ALIGNMENT SLEEVE, WHEREAS SCREW SHANK WAS IN THE VERTEBRAL BODY ITSELF. THERE WAS ISSUE IN INNIE (LOCKING CAP) INSERTION INITIALLY AND INNIES THREADS WERE NOT ENGAGING TO THE SCREW, AND WHEN SURGEON TRIED TO REVISE THE SCREW, BOTH THE HEADS ONLY CAME OUT. TOTAL 2 SCREWS AND 4 INNIES DAMAGED. WITHOUT REMOVING FRAGMENTS, THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH 60-MINUTES DELAY. THE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. CONCOMITANT DEVICE REPORTED: UNKNOWN INSERTION INSTRUMENT (PART# UNKNOWN, LOT# UNKNOWN, QUANTITY UNKNOWN). UNKNOWN ROD (PART# UNKNOWN, LOT# UNKNOWN, QTY UNKNOWN). THIS COMPLAINT INVOLVES (6) DEVICES. THIS REPORT IS FOR (1) MIS TI CFX FEN POLY 7X45. THIS REPORT IS 1 OF 4 FOR (B)(4).
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13100986 ↗InjuryAug 31, 2021Break; Entrapment of Device; Break; Entrapment of Device
DEVICE REPORT FROM SYNTHES REPORTS AN EVENT IN (B)(6) AS FOLLOWS: IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON AN UNKNOWN DATE, AFTER A DORSAL EXTENSION WITH FUSION L4/5 THE PATIENT COMPLAINT ABOUT PERSISTENT LUMBAR PAIN. A CT SCAN-MORPHOLOGICAL SHOWED SCREW LOOSENING BILATERALLY. DURING THE CORRECTIVE PROCEDURE, THE REMOVAL OF THE SCREW S1 ON THE RIGHT, WAS ONLY PARTIALLY REMOVED BECAUSE THE SCREW BROKE DISTALLY IN THE AREA OF THE PERFORATION. A NEW SCREW WAS IMPLANTED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION PROVIDED. THIS REPORT IS FOR ONE (1) VIPER SYSTEM FENESTRATED CORTICAL FIX POLYAXIAL SCREW 5.5 X 7 X 45MM. THIS IS REPORT 1 OF 1 FOR (B)(4).
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 12391820 ↗MalfunctionAug 17, 2021Break; Break
DEVICE REPORT FROM (B)(6) REPORTS AN EVENT AS FOLLOWS: IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING ROBOT-ASSISTED LUMBAR FUSION AND INTERNAL FIXATION ON (B)(6) 2021, THE SCREW BROKE WHILE BEING INSERTED. ANOTHER SCREW WAS USED, BUT THE SAME PROBLEM OCCURRED. A THIRD DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE SURGERY. ALL PIECES WERE REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT. PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH NO DELAY. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. THIS REPORT IS FOR A MIS TI CFX FEN POLY 7X45. THIS IS REPORT 2 OF 2 FOR (B)(4).
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12331450 ↗MalfunctionAug 17, 2021Break; Break
DEVICE REPORT FROM (B)(6) REPORTS AN EVENT AS FOLLOWS: IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING ROBOT-ASSISTED LUMBAR FUSION AND INTERNAL FIXATION ON (B)(6) 2021, THE SCREW BROKE WHILE BEING INSERTED. ANOTHER SCREW WAS USED, BUT THE SAME PROBLEM OCCURRED. A THIRD DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE SURGERY. ALL PIECES WERE REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT. PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH NO DELAY. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. THIS REPORT IS FOR A MIS TI CFX FEN POLY 7X45. THIS IS REPORT 1 OF 2 FOR (B)(4).
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12331328 ↗MalfunctionJun 1, 2020Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
DEVICE REPORT FROM (B)(6) REPORTS AN EVENT AS FOLLOWS: IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2020 THAT THE SCREW HEAD DISENGAGED FROM THE SCREW SHAFT WHILE INSERTING THE SCREW. THERE WAS NO EXTRA FORCE USED. CONCOMITANT DEVICE: UNKNOWN SCREWDRIVER (PART# UNKNOWN, LOT# UNKNOWN, QUANTITY 1). THIS REPORT IS FOR ONE (1) CORTICAL FIX FENESTRATED, 7.0 X 45MM. THIS IS REPORT 1 OF 1 FOR (B)(4).
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 10106033 ↗MalfunctionMay 21, 2019Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SCREW FRACTURED JUST BELOW THE TULIP AT THE RIGHT SIDED S1 SCREW. IMPORTANT TO KEEP IN MIND THE PATIENT HAD A SACRALIZED L5. THE SURGEONS ASSISTANT WAS TRYING TO REENGAGE THE VIPER CANNULATED DRIVER, ALONG WITH THE T20, AND THE VIPER 3D THREADED DRIVER SO THAT THEY COULD ADVANCE THE SCREW. THE T20 & VIPER 3D THGD DRIVER BOTH STRIPPED IN THE PROCESS, FOLLOWED BY THE SCREW BREAKING JUST BELOW THE TULIP. THE SURGEON WAS ABLE TO USE UNIVERSAL REMOVAL TO TAKE THE BROKEN PIECE OUT. NOTE THAT WE CONTINUED TO HAVE A PROBLEM WITH EXTENSIONS AT THAT SAME SPOT, THEY KEPT DISENGAGING. THERE WAS NOTHING WRONG WITH THE EXTENSIONS.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8627838 ↗MalfunctionApr 26, 2019Break; Break
THE FOLLOWING WAS REPORTED: SCREW BREAKAGE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE POSTERIOR LUMBAR CLOSED REPOSITION AND INTERNAL FIXATION + VERTEBRAL AUGMENTATION, WHEN DID SUBCUTANEOUS ROD INSERTION, THE SCREW EXTENDER ALONG WITH THE SCREW HEAD FELL OFF, USED THE SCREW REMOVAL TOOL TO RETRIEVE THE SCREW ROD, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE CONNECTING RING BETWEEN THE SCREW HEAD AND THE SCREW ROD WAS BROKEN OFF AS THE PHOTO SHOWS. THE SURGERY DELAYED ABOUT 30 MINUTES. THE PATIENT IS STABLE AND IN HOSPITAL NOW.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8556899 ↗InjuryNov 15, 2018Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED: BROKEN ROD AT L5 LEFT / CAUSED THE REVISION (REVISION CASE TOOK PLACE (B)(6) 2018). LOOSE PEDICLE SCREW L5 RIGHT / CAUSED THE REVISION (REVISION CASE TOOK PLACE (B)(6) 2018). BROKEN PEDICLE SCREW S1 RIGHT / CAUSED THE REVISION (REVISION CASE TOOK PLACE (B)(6) 2018). BROKEN ILIAC SCREW RIGHT / CAUSED THE REVISION (REVISION CASE TOOK PLACE (B)(6) 2018). LOOSE PEDICLE SCREW L5 LEFT / CAUSED THE REVISION (REVISION CASE TOOK PLACE (B)(6) 2018). BROKEN EXPEDIUM POLYAXIAL SCREWDRIVER / OCCURRED DURING THE REVISION SURGERY (B)(6) 2018. BROKEN POWER EXPEDIUM / OCCURRED DURING THE REVISION SURGERY (B)(6) 2018.
Patient problems: No Code Available
MAUDE report 8074698 ↗MalfunctionOct 1, 2018Disconnection; Disconnection
IT WAS REPORTED AN L3-S1 MIS TLIF + POSTERIOR INSTRUMENTED FUSION: (B)(6); (B)(6) HOSPITAL (B)(6) 2018. WHILST TRYING TO SEAT THE ROD, SURGEON WAS UNABLE TO REDUCE SET SCREW INTO HEAD OF TULIP. TRIED MULTIPLE TIMES. SURGEON REQUESTED X-RAY. ON X-RAY IT WAS APPARENT THAT THE TULIP HAD DISENGAGED FROM SHANK OF SCREW. SURGEON WAS ABLE TO RELEASE TULIP FROM EXTENSION TUBE. SHANK OF SCREW WAS BACKED OUT BY T20 DRIVER IN EXPEDIUM KIT. THIS TOOK 2 HOURS, ADDITIONAL TIME FOR PATIENT UNDER ANAESTHESIA. SURGEON WOULD LIKE DEVICE REPORT AS TO THIS LOT NUMBER TO MINIMISE RISK TO OTHER PATIENTS. NOT A DESIRABLE OUTCOME FOR HIS PATIENT.
Patient problems: Not Applicable
MAUDE report 7922423 ↗
Other bone cement, posterior screw augmentation devices
- VIPER 186727645Medos International Sàrl · bone cement, posterior screw augmentation3 deaths27 reports
- EXPEDIUM VERSE 199723645Medos International Sàrl · bone cement, posterior screw augmentation21 reports
- EXPEDIUM VERSE 199723745Medos International Sàrl · bone cement, posterior screw augmentation13 reports
- VIPER 186727640Medos International Sàrl · bone cement, posterior screw augmentation2 deaths11 reports
- VIPER 186727850Medos International Sàrl · bone cement, posterior screw augmentation9 reports
- EXPEDIUM VERSE 199723435Medos International Sàrl · bone cement, posterior screw augmentation6 reports
- EXPEDIUM VERSE 199723655Medos International Sàrl · bone cement, posterior screw augmentation4 reports
- EXPEDIUM VERSE 199723535Medos International Sàrl · bone cement, posterior screw augmentation4 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page