VIPER 186727755Recalls & reported problems
Medos International Sàrl · VIPER SYSTEM FENESTRATED CORTICAL FIX POLYAXIAL SCREW 5.5 x 7 x 55mm · Class 2 · Implant
All models of VIPER (121)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 6
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 3
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10705034282695), received between Sep 14, 2017 and Feb 10, 2026 — classified as 3 injuries, 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (3 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break3
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Device Slipped1
- Device-Device Incompatibility1
- Entrapment of Device1
- Material Separation1
Patient problems
- Foreign Body In Patient1
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
- No Code Available1
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
- Nonunion/Delayed-union Bone Fracture1
- Post Operative Wound Infection1
Recent adverse event reports
The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryFeb 10, 2026Break; Entrapment of Device
IT WAS REPORTED THAT MIS TI CFX FEN POLY 7X50 AND MIS TI CFX FEN POLY 7X55 WERE INVOLVED IN AN INTRAOPERATIVE EVENT DURING A POSTERIOR SPINAL FUSION PROCEDURE. THE REPORTED FAILURE INVOLVED BOTH SCREWS BREAKING INTO TWO OR MORE PIECES INTRAOPERATIVELY, WITH THE TULIP TORN DOWN AND SCREW SHANKS UNABLE TO BE REMOVED. AS A RESULT, FRAGMENTS REMAINED EMBEDDED WITHIN THE PATIENT, AND THE SURGERY WAS PROLONGED BY 30 MINUTES. THE PROCEDURE WAS ULTIMATELY COMPLETED, BUT ADDITIONAL MEDICAL INTERVENTION WAS REQUIRED DUE TO THE RETAINED SCREW SHAFTS. BOTH DEVICES ARE IDENTIFIED AS IMPLANTS AND HAVE REMAINED IN THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 24303378 ↗InjuryJan 4, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THIS REPORT IS BEING FILED AFTER THE REVIEW OF A CLINICAL EVALUATION REPORT (CER) FROM A DATABASE RELATED RESEARCH ACTIVITY (DRRA): SPINE TANGO SOA REPORT - TLIF. THE FOLLOWING COMPLICATIONS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED: POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION SUPERFICIAL COMPLICATION TIME/INTERVENTION. REPEAT SURGERY THIS IS FOR DEPUY SYNTHES SPINE VIPER /OTHER AND VIPER CFX FENESTRATED (MIS TI CFX FEN POLY 7X55 (B)(4).
Patient problems: Post Operative Wound Infection
MAUDE report 18447341 ↗MalfunctionApr 28, 2023Device-Device Incompatibility; Device-Device Incompatibility
DEVICE REPORT FROM SYNTHES REPORTS AN EVENT IN GERMANY AS FOLLOWS: IT WAS REPORTED ON (B)(6) 2023, THAT DURING SCREW INSERTION THE TIP OF SCREW DRIVER BROKE AND REMAINED STUCK IN THE SCREW HEAD. SCREW HAD TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED. WE USED A ROD AND A SET CAP TO BLOCK THE SCREW HEAD AND REMOVED THE ASSEMBLY VIA ROD HOLDER. THE SURGERY WAS DELAYED DUE TO THE REPORTED EVENT FOR 10 MINUTES. THERE IS NO INDICATION THAT THE DELAY RESULTED IN ANY IMPACT TO THE EXPECTED SURGICAL OUTCOME. USING ADDITIONAL INSTRUMENTATION, THE SCREW, WITH THE BROKEN FRAGMENT IN ITS HEAD, WAS EXPLANTED, AND THE PROCEDURE COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. CONCOMITANT DEVICE REPORTED: UNKNOWN RODS (PART# UNKNOWN; LOT# UNKNOWN; QUANTITY: 1) THIS REPORT IS FOR ONE (1) UNKNOWN SCREWS THIS IS REPORT 2 OF 2 FOR COMPLAINT (B)(4).
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16833820 ↗InjuryDec 17, 2020Break; Device Slipped; Break; Device Slipped
THE BROKEN TIP OF THE SCREW REMAINS IN THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: Nonunion/Delayed-union Bone Fracture
MAUDE report 11028275 ↗MalfunctionMay 13, 2020Break; Break
IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED REPLACING SCREW WITH THE SAME SIZE.
Patient problems: No Code Available; No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 10053806 ↗MalfunctionSep 14, 2017Material Separation; Material Separation
THE CFX SCREW WAS INSERTED BY SURGEON PERCUTANEOUSLY. THE SCREW HEAD SLIGHTLY TOO CLOSE TO THE SCLEROTIC BONE, SO THEY SAT TOO DEEP AND THE SCREW WAS NOT MORE POLY-AXIAL. WHILE SCREW OUT THE SCREW, THE SCREW HEAD HAS LOOSEN FROM SCREW SHAFT. THE INNER PART OF SCREW HEAD COULD ONLY RECOVERED IN CRUMBLED ITEMS AND WAS DISCARDED.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 6864180 ↗
Other ORTHOSIS, SPINAL PEDICLE FIXATION devices
- NA 04.614.508Synthes GmbH · ORTHOSIS, SPINAL PEDICLE FIXATION277 reports
- CREO 1134.0010Globus Medical, Inc. · ORTHOSIS, SPINAL PEDICLE FIXATION112 reports
- CREO 1119.0010Globus Medical, Inc. · ORTHOSIS, SPINAL PEDICLE FIXATION80 reports
- VIPER 186731745Medos International Sàrl · ORTHOSIS, SPINAL PEDICLE FIXATION43 reports
- CD HORIZON® Spinal System 1553201090Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · ORTHOSIS, SPINAL PEDICLE FIXATION38 reports
- EXPEDIUM 179902000Medos International Sàrl · ORTHOSIS, SPINAL PEDICLE FIXATION37 reports
- CD HORIZON® Spinal System 7540220Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · ORTHOSIS, SPINAL PEDICLE FIXATION36 reports
- EXPEDIUM VERSE 199721640Medos International Sàrl · ORTHOSIS, SPINAL PEDICLE FIXATION35 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page