VIPER 186727840Recalls & reported problems
Medos International Sàrl · VIPER SYSTEM FENESTRATED CORTICAL FIX POLYAXIAL SCREW 5.5 x 8 x 40mm · Class 2 · Implant
Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 7
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 5
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10705034282770), received between Oct 16, 2017 and Sep 27, 2022 — classified as 5 injuries, 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loose or Intermittent Connection” (4 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Loose or Intermittent Connection4
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Break1
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
Patient problems
- Not Applicable3
- Spinal Column Injury3
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
- No Code Available1
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
- Osteolysis1
- Unspecified Infection1
Recent adverse event reports
The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionSep 27, 2022Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
DEVICE REPORT FROM SYNTHES REPORTS AN EVENT IN ITALY AS FOLLOWS: IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2022, THE SURGEON INSERTED AN 8X40 CORTICAL FIX SCREW AND AFTER HEARING A STRANGE NOISE, REMOVED THE SCREW. ONCE IT CAME OUT, THE TULIP HEAD WAS DISMEMBERED FROM THE STEM. IN THE SAME SURGERY, AND ON THE SAME LEVEL (L3), ANOTHER IDENTICAL SCREW (SAME SIZE AND SAME LOT) BROKE THE TIP OF THE INSERTION SCREWDRIVER WHILE BEING INSERTED. ACCORDING TO THE SURGEON, THE PATIENT'S BONE WAS PARTICULARLY HARD. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY BUT DELAYED 45 MINUTES AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE. THIS REPORT INVOLVES ONE VIPER SYSTEM FENESTRATED CORTICAL FIX POLYAXIAL SCREW 5.5 X 8 X 40MM. THIS IS REPORT 1 OF 2 FOR (B)(4).
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15493532 ↗InjurySep 7, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THIS CASE IS BEING LOGGED TO CAPTURE THE REVISION ASSOCIATED WITH (B)(4) WHICH RECEIVED AS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. IT WAS REPORTED THAT, THE REVISION OF POSTERIOR LUMBAR SPINAL FUSION WAS PERFORMED. THE REASON FOR REVISION WAS ADJACENT SEGMENT DEGENERATION/ADJACENT LEVEL DISEASE. THE EXPLANTED PRODUCTS WERE EXPEDIUM PEDICLE SCREWS AND CFX SCREWS, BUT THE LOT NUMBERS ARE NOT AVAILABLE. THE IMPLANTS WERE DISCARDED AND NOT AVAILABLE FOR COLLECTION. THIS REPORT IS FOR ONE (1) VIPER SYSTEM FENESTRATED CORTICAL FIX POLYAXIAL SCREW 5.5 X 8 X 40MM. THIS IS REPORT 1 OF 2 FOR (B)(4).
Patient problems: Osteolysis
MAUDE report 12433470 ↗InjuryMay 17, 2019Loose or Intermittent Connection; Loose or Intermittent Connection
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT 1ST SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2018, FUSION L5-S1 WITH EXPEDIUM AND T-PAL. ON (B)(6) 2018, REVISION SURGERY BECAUSE OF RADICULOPATHY AND SUSPICION ON INFECTION. IMPLANTS WHERE LOOSE, HAVE BEEN REMOVED AND REPLACED. POST OP PAIN FREE. TISSUE HAS BEEN EXAMINED IN BACTERIOLOGY, ONE SAMPLE WAS POSITIVE. PATIENT SHOWED UP IN (B)(6) WITH BACK PAIN, EXAMINATIONS HAVE SHOWN AGAIN PSEUDARTHROSIS AND LOOSENING OF THE IMPLANTS. ON (B)(6), AGAIN REVISION SURGERY, REMOVAL OF ALL IMPLANTS, WHICH HAVE BEEN SENT IN FOR BACTERIOLOGICAL EXAMINATION. SEVERAL TISSUE SAMPLES WILL ALSO BE EXAMINED BACTERIOLOGICALLY. T-PAL CAGE WILL BE REMOVED FROM ANTERIOR AFTER THESE RESULTS OF THE BACTERIOLOGICAL EXAMINATION ARE KNOWN.
Patient problems: No Code Available; Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 8621158 ↗InjuryMar 20, 2018Loose or Intermittent Connection; Loose or Intermittent Connection
REVISION FOR BROKEN RODS - DR (B)(6) PRIVATE (B)(6) 2018. PRIMARY IMPLANT DATE: (B)(6) 2015 DR (B)(6) PRIVATE. THE 1ST REVISION (B)(6) 2016 CF 5098185/(B)(4). THE 2ND REVISION (B)(6) 2016 CF 5098188/(B)(4). THE 3RD REVISION (B)(6) 2016 CF 5098030/(B)(4). THE 4TH REVISION (B)(6) 2018 PATIENT RE-OPERATED ON TO REPLACE BILATERAL BROKEN RODS AND LOOSENING OF 3 SCREWS IN LOWER SECTION OF CONSTRUCT L4- PELVIS, BELOW INLINE CONNECTORS. ALL SET SCREWS,ROD CONNECTORS,THREE LARGER DIAMETER SCREWS AND TWO RODS REPLACED REPLACE BELOW CONNECTION POINT OF UPPER CONSTRUCT. PATIENT INITIALS BE
Patient problems: Not Applicable; Spinal Column Injury
MAUDE report 7354931 ↗InjuryMar 20, 2018Loose or Intermittent Connection; Loose or Intermittent Connection
REVISION FOR BROKEN RODS - DR (B)(6) PRIVATE (B)(6) 2018. PRIMARY IMPLANT DATE: (B)(6) 2015 DR (B)(6) PRIVATE. ON 1ST REVISION (B)(6) 2016 CF 5098185/(B)(4). ON 2ND REVISION (B)(6) 2016 CF 5098188/(B)(4). ON 3 REVISION (B)(6) 2016 CF 5098030/(B)(4). ON 4TH REVISION (B)(6) 2018 PATIENT RE-OPERATED ON TO REPLACE BILATERAL BROKEN RODS AND LOOSENING OF 3 SCREWS IN LOWER SECTION OF CONSTRUCT L4- PELVIS, BELOW INLINE CONNECTORS. ALL SET SCREWS, ROD CONNECTORS,THREE LARGER DIAMETER SCREWS AND TWO RODS REPLACED REPLACE BELOW CONNECTION POINT OF UPPER CONSTRUCT. PATIENT INITIALS BE
Patient problems: Not Applicable; Spinal Column Injury
MAUDE report 7354842 ↗InjuryMar 20, 2018Loose or Intermittent Connection; Loose or Intermittent Connection
REVISION FOR BROKEN RODS - DR (B)(6) PRIVATE (B)(6) 2018. PRIMARY IMPLANT DATE: (B)(6) 2015 DR (B)(6) PRIVATE. ON 1ST REVISION (B)(6) 2016 CF 5098185/(B)(4). ON 2ND REVISION (B)(6) 2016 CF 5098188/(B)(4). ON 3RD REVISION (B)(6) 2016 CF 5098030/(B)(4). ON 4TH REVISION (B)(6) 2018 PATIENT RE-OPERATED ON TO REPLACE BILATERAL BROKEN RODS AND LOOSENING OF 3 SCREWS IN LOWER SECTION OF CONSTRUCT L4- PELVIS, BELOW INLINE CONNECTORS. ALL SET SCREWS,ROD CONNECTORS,THREE LARGER DIAMETER SCREWS AND TWO RODS REPLACED REPLACE BELOW CONNECTION POINT OF UPPER CONSTRUCT. (B)(6)
Patient problems: Not Applicable; Spinal Column Injury
MAUDE report 7354724 ↗MalfunctionOct 16, 2017Break; Break
CFX 8.0 MM SCREW DISMANTLED WHILE IMPLANTING IN L5 RIGHT LEVEL OF PATIENT. THE CFX SCREW WAS ALMOST TOTALLY SCREWED DOWN INTO THE PEDICLE BONE WHEN THE BALL-JOINT RUPTURED LEAVING THE SCREW HEAD TOTALLY AWAY FROM THE THREAD. HEAD AND DEBRIS OF RUPTURED BALL-JOINT WHERE IMMEDIATELY REMOVED WITH NO DAMAGE TO THE PATIENT. THE CFX SCREW THREAD WAS QUITE EASY REMOVED WITH HELP OF EXP.VIPER RESCUE SCREW-DRIVER. ANOTHER CFX WAS IMMEDIATELY INSERTED WITH NO PROBLEM
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 6952497 ↗
Other ORTHOSIS, SPINAL PEDICLE FIXATION devices
- NA 04.614.508Synthes GmbH · ORTHOSIS, SPINAL PEDICLE FIXATION277 reports
- CREO 1134.0010Globus Medical, Inc. · ORTHOSIS, SPINAL PEDICLE FIXATION112 reports
- CREO 1119.0010Globus Medical, Inc. · ORTHOSIS, SPINAL PEDICLE FIXATION80 reports
- VIPER 186731745Medos International Sàrl · ORTHOSIS, SPINAL PEDICLE FIXATION43 reports
- CD HORIZON® Spinal System 1553201090Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · ORTHOSIS, SPINAL PEDICLE FIXATION38 reports
- EXPEDIUM 179902000Medos International Sàrl · ORTHOSIS, SPINAL PEDICLE FIXATION37 reports
- CD HORIZON® Spinal System 7540220Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · ORTHOSIS, SPINAL PEDICLE FIXATION36 reports
- EXPEDIUM VERSE 199721640Medos International Sàrl · ORTHOSIS, SPINAL PEDICLE FIXATION35 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 13, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 13, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page