Skip to content

COUGAR 189155616Recalls & reported problems

Medos International Sàrl · COUGAR LS LATERAL CAGE SYSTEM LORDOTIC CAGE 18 x 16 x 55mm, 15 DEGREES · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 10705034356976), received between Feb 26, 2018 and Feb 26, 2018 — classified as 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break1

Patient problems

  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
  • Not Applicable1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionFeb 26, 2018Break; Break

    CFRP COUGAR LATERAL CAGE ITEM (B)(4) SHEERED/SPLIT UPON IMPLANTING INTO DISC SPACE. THE SURGEON EXPLAINED TO ME AFTER THE CASE THAT THE CAGE APPEARED TO HAVE BEEN CROSS THREADED, HE NOTICED THIS AS HE WAS ATTEMPTING TO DISENGAGE THE CAGE FROM THE INSERTER IT WAS PROVIDING RESISTANCE. HE SAID THE CAGE SPLIT AT ITS MOST FRAGILE SPOT, THE INNER THREADS OF THE CAGE WHERE THE INSERTER ENGAGES THE IMPLANT. HE SAID THAT THERE APPEARED TO BE A CRACK ALONGSIDE THE TI MARKINGS BUT HIS OPINION WAS THAT IT DID NOT SHEER THROUGH THE TI AND THEREFOR HE FELT IT STILL WAS STABLE IN HIS CLINICAL OPINION, AND REMOVING IT COULD HAVE DONE MORE DAMAGE THAN JUST LEAVING IT AND PROVIDING EXTRA FIXATION WITH A CERVICAL PLATE 22MM AND FOUR LARGE DIAMETER 4.0X18MM SCREWS ALONG WITH FOUR PERC VIPER CORTICAL FIX SCREWS POSTERIOR AND TWO RODS. PATIENT CONSEQUENCE? :UNKNOWN. PATIENT CONSEQUENCE DESCRIPTION:NO IMMEDIATE CONSEQUENCE, SURGEON LEFT IMPLANT INSIDE INTERBODY AND SECURED THE SPACE USING A LATERAL PLATE FOR EXTRA SUPPORT AS WELL AS POSTERIOR FIXATION. ACTION TAKEN FOR PROCEDURE:THE SURGEON HAD TO PLACE A LATERAL PLATE WITH 4 SCREWS FOR ADDITIONAL STABILIZATION. IS THE INFORMATION BEING SUBMITTED FOR TH

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient; Not Applicable

    MAUDE report 7297198 ↗

Other SPINAL VERTEBRAL BODY REPLACEMENT DEVICE devices

All SPINAL VERTEBRAL BODY REPLACEMENT DEVICE devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page