Skip to content

CONDUIT LET20100TRecalls & reported problems

Medos International Sàrl · CONDUIT Lateral Lumbar Interbody Trial Inserter Outer Shaft · Class 2

All models of CONDUIT (27)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
7
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10705034557069), received between Mar 27, 2023 and Oct 22, 2025 — classified as 7 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device-Device Incompatibility” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 1 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 3 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 1 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520263
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device-Device Incompatibility3
  • Material Deformation3
  • Mechanical Jam2
  • Material Twisted/Bent1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions7

Recent adverse event reports

The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionOct 22, 2025Device-Device Incompatibility; Material Deformation; Device-Device Incompatibility; Material Deformation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A PROCEDURE, THE INSTRUMENT FOR INSERTING THE TRIALS HAS THREADS AFFECTED BY NUMEROUS IMPACTS OF THE HAMMER AND THE THREADS HAVE BEEN AFFECTED AND MAY HAVE CAUSED A DENT DUE TO IT. IT IS NOW HARD TO ATTACH THE INSTRUMENTS TOGETHER. SURGICAL TEAM MADE DO WITH WHAT WAS PROVIDED IN THE SET. THERE WAS NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCE. THERE WAS A SURGICAL DELAY OF A COUPLE OF MINUTES.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23359416 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 15, 2024Device-Device Incompatibility; Material Twisted/Bent; Device-Device Incompatibility; Material Twisted/Bent

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON JUNE 11, 2024 AFTER INSTRUMENTS WENT THROUGH STERILE TO BE CLEANED, THE INSTRUMENT WOULD NOT COME APART. THE END LOCKING KNOB IS CROSS THREADED AND WOULD NOT MOVE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT. THIS REPORT INVOLVES ONE (1) CONDUIT LATERAL LUMBAR INTERBODY TRIAL INSERTER OUTER SHAFT. THIS IS REPORT 1 OF 1 FOR (B)(4).

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19741692 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 12, 2024Mechanical Jam; Mechanical Jam

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2024, POST-OPERATIVELY THE INNER SHAFT OF THE CONDUIT LLIF TRIAL IMPLANT IS STUCK AND CAN NO LONGER BE REMOVED. THERE WAS NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCE. THIS REPORT IS FOR ONE (1) TRIAL INSERTER OUTER SHAFT. THIS IS REPORT 1 OF 4 FOR (B)(4).

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19733930 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 12, 2024Mechanical Jam; Mechanical Jam

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2024, POST-OPERATIVELY THE INNER SHAFT OF THE CONDUIT LLIF TRIAL IMPLANT IS STUCK AND CAN NO LONGER BE REMOVED. THERE WAS NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCE. THIS REPORT IS FOR ONE (1) TRIAL INSERTER OUTER SHAFT THIS IS REPORT 3 OF 4 FOR (B)(4).

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19733889 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 8, 2023Device-Device Incompatibility; Device-Device Incompatibility

    NO OTHER MEDICAL INTERVENTION WAS REQUIRED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18291232 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 27, 2023Material Deformation; Material Deformation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2023, SALES REPRESENTATIVE HAVE BEEN INFORMED BY MARKETING TO FILE THE BELOW COMPLAINT. THE SALES REPRESENTATIVE NOTICED THAT THE TIPS OF THE CONDUIT LATERAL TRIAL INSERTER ARE BECOMING DEFORMED WITH USE. THIS IS CAUSING THE BALL TIP ON THE INNER SHAFT TO NOT EASILY PASS THROUGH THE TIP OF THE OUTER INSERTER SHAFT. THIS DEFORMATION HAS PROGRESSED TO THE POINT WHERE DURING ASSEMBLY A MALLET IS USED TO TAP THE INNER BALL TIPPED SHAFT PASSED THE TIP OF THE INSERTER WHERE IT INTERFACES WITH THE TRIAL. TO DISASSEMBLE AND REMOVE THE INNER SHAFT FROM THE TRIAL INSERTER SALES REPRESENTATIVE USING A SLAP HAMMER ATTACHED TO THE INSERTER KNOB TO FORCE THE BALL TIP PAST THE DEFORMED TIP. THIS IS HAPPENING WITH 2 OF THE CONDUIT LATERAL TRIAL INSERTERS. IT SEEMS TO BE PROGRESSING OVER TIME AND USAGE. ALSO, THE SALES CONSULTANT NOTICING DEFORMATION OF CONDUIT LATERAL TRIAL INSERTER IS DEFORMING FROM REPEATED USAGE. IT IS AFFECTING ASSEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLY OF THE INSERTER BUT NOT THE FUNCTION. THE ISSUE APPEARS TO BE RELATED TO GENERAL USAGE AND NOT ONE SPECIFIC EVENT. THIS COMPLAINT INVOLVES ONE (1) DEVICE. THIS REPORT IS FOR ONE (1) TRIAL INSERTER OUTER SHAFT THIS

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16622508 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 27, 2023Material Deformation; Material Deformation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON MARCH 8, 2023, SALES REPRESENTATIVE HAVE BEEN INFORMED BY MARKETING TO FILE THE BELOW COMPLAINT. THE SALES REPRESENTATIVE NOTICED THAT THE TIPS OF THE CONDUIT LATERAL TRIAL INSERTER ARE BECOMING DEFORMED WITH USE. THIS IS CAUSING THE BALL TIP ON THE INNER SHAFT TO NOT EASILY PASS THROUGH THE TIP OF THE OUTER INSERTER SHAFT. THIS DEFORMATION HAS PROGRESSED TO THE POINT WHERE DURING ASSEMBLY A MALLET IS USED TO TAP THE INNER BALL TIPPED SHAFT PASSED THE TIP OF THE INSERTER WHERE IT INTERFACES WITH THE TRIAL. TO DISASSEMBLE AND REMOVE THE INNER SHAFT FROM THE TRIAL INSERTER SALES REPRESENTATIVE USING A SLAP HAMMER ATTACHED TO THE INSERTER KNOB TO FORCE THE BALL TIP PAST THE DEFORMED TIP. THIS IS HAPPENING WITH 2 OF THE CONDUIT LATERAL TRIAL INSERTERS. IT SEEMS TO BE PROGRESSING OVER TIME AND USAGE. ALSO, THE SALES CONSULTANT NOTICING DEFORMATION OF CONDUIT LATERAL TRIAL INSERTER IS DEFORMING FROM REPEATED USAGE. IT IS AFFECTING ASSEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLY OF THE INSERTER BUT NOT THE FUNCTION. THE ISSUE APPEARS TO BE RELATED TO GENERAL USAGE AND NOT ONE SPECIFIC EVENT. THIS COMPLAINT INVOLVES ONE (1) DEVICE. THIS REPORT IS FOR ONE (1) TRIAL INSERTER OUTER SHAFT. TH

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16622506 ↗

Other Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar devices

All Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page