CONDUIT 187210110Recalls & reported problems
Medos International Sàrl · CONDUIT Lateral System Switch Plate, Two-Hole, Small · Class 2 · Implant
All models of CONDUIT (27)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 8
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 8 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10705034574523), received between Jun 11, 2025 and Dec 26, 2025 — classified as 8 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device-Device Incompatibility” (8 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Device-Device Incompatibility8
- Device Slipped1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions8
Recent adverse event reports
The 8 most recent of 8 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionDec 26, 2025Device Slipped; Device-Device Incompatibility; Device Slipped; Device-Device Incompatibility
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SWITCH PLATE KEPT BECOMING LOOSE TO CAGE AFTER TORQUING MULTIPLE TIMES. HAD TO OPEN ANOTHER IMPLANT TO FINISH CASE. PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH A TEN MINUTE DELAY. THERE WAS NO ADVERSE EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23898486 ↗MalfunctionNov 20, 2025Device-Device Incompatibility; Device-Device Incompatibility
IT WAS REPORTED ON UNKNOWN DATE THAT THE PLATES TORQUED OUT PREMATURELY CAUSING US TO BE UNABLE TO ATTACH THE SWITCHPLATE TO THE CAGE IN A PROPER SECURE FASHION CONSISTENT WITH OUR USAGE OF SAID PRODUCT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23604523 ↗MalfunctionOct 24, 2025Device-Device Incompatibility; Device-Device Incompatibility
IT WAS REPORTED ON (B)(6) 2025, SEVERAL SWITCHPLATES WOULD NOT CONNECT TO THE CAGE. IT SEEMED AS THOUGH THE LOCKING MECHANISMS WERE NOT FUNCTIONING CORRECTLY. WHEN THE CAGE WAS MOVED SLIGHTLY OBLIQUE DURING ATTACHMENT OF THE CAGE TO THE SWITCHPLATE, THIS SEEMED TO ALLOW THE CAMLOCK TIGHTENER TO TURN AND LOCK THE SWITCHPLATE TO THE CAGE. THE CAGE WAS THEN ABLE TO BE STRAIGHTENED AND TIGHTENED UNTIL THE HANDLE TORQUED AND THE CAGE/SWITCHPLATE CONSTRUCT WAS ASSEMBLED SUCCESSFULLY. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH NO DELAY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23380522 ↗MalfunctionOct 24, 2025Device-Device Incompatibility; Device-Device Incompatibility
IT WAS REPORTED ON (B)(6) 2025, SEVERAL SWITCH PLATES WOULD NOT CONNECT TO THE CAGE. IT SEEMED AS THOUGH THE LOCKING MECHANISMS WERE NOT FUNCTIONING CORRECTLY. WHEN THE CAGE WAS MOVED SLIGHTLY OBLIQUE DURING ATTACHMENT OF THE CAGE TO THE SWITCH PLATE, THIS SEEMED TO ALLOW THE CAMLOCK TIGHTENER TO TURN AND LOCK THE SWITCH PLATE TO THE CAGE. THE CAGE WAS THEN ABLE TO BE STRAIGHTENED AND TIGHTENED UNTIL THE HANDLE TORQUED AND THE CAGE/SWITCH PLATE CONSTRUCT WAS ASSEMBLED SUCCESSFULLY. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH NO DELAY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23380491 ↗MalfunctionOct 24, 2025Device-Device Incompatibility; Device-Device Incompatibility
IT WAS REPORTED ON (B)(6) 2025, SEVERAL SWITCHPLATES WOULD NOT CONNECT TO THE CAGE. IT SEEMED AS THOUGH THE LOCKING MECHANISMS WERE NOT FUNCTIONING CORRECTLY. WHEN THE CAGE WAS MOVED SLIGHTLY OBLIQUE DURING ATTACHMENT OF THE CAGE TO THE SWITCHPLATE, THIS SEEMED TO ALLOW THE CAMLOCK TIGHTENER TO TURN AND LOCK THE SWITCHPLATE TO THE CAGE. THE CAGE WAS THEN ABLE TO BE STRAIGHTENED AND TIGHTENED UNTIL THE HANDLE TORQUED AND THE CAGE/SWITCHPLATE CONSTRUCT WAS ASSEMBLED SUCCESSFULLY. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH NO DELAY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23380425 ↗MalfunctionOct 24, 2025Device-Device Incompatibility; Device-Device Incompatibility
IT WAS REPORTED ON (B)(6) 2025, SEVERAL SWITCHPLATES WOULD NOT CONNECT TO THE CAGE. IT SEEMED AS THOUGH THE LOCKING MECHANISMS WERE NOT FUNCTIONING CORRECTLY. WHEN THE CAGE WAS MOVED SLIGHTLY OBLIQUE DURING ATTACHMENT OF THE CAGE TO THE SWITCHPLATE, THIS SEEMED TO ALLOW THE CAMLOCK TIGHTENER TO TURN AND LOCK THE SWITCHPLATE TO THE CAGE. THE CAGE WAS THEN ABLE TO BE STRAIGHTENED AND TIGHTENED UNTIL THE HANDLE TORQUED AND THE CAGE/SWITCHPLATE CONSTRUCT WAS ASSEMBLED SUCCESSFULLY. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH NO DELAY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23380373 ↗MalfunctionOct 24, 2025Device-Device Incompatibility; Device-Device Incompatibility
IT WAS REPORTED THAT WHEN THE TWO HOLE SMALL SWITCHPLATE WAS BEING ATTACHED TO THE CAGE PRIOR TO INSERTION, THE SWITCHPLATE TORQUED OUT PREMATURELY SO THE CAGE AND SWITCHPLATE WOULD NOT ATTACH SECURELY. THE SURGEON TWISTED THE TORQUE HANDLE T-BAR LOCKING MECHANISM BACK AND FORTH AND EVENTUALLY WAS ABLE TO ATTACH THE CAGE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23379189 ↗MalfunctionJun 11, 2025Device-Device Incompatibility; Device-Device Incompatibility
IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2025 THE SURGEON WAS PERFORMING A L3-L4 PRONE LATERAL SURGERY. AT THE TIME TO IMPLANT THE CAGE AND PLATE, THE SURGICAL TECH WAS UNABLE TO FIX THE TWO-HOLE SMALL SWITCHPLATE TO THE CONDUIT LATERAL CAGE. AFTER 3 OR 4 ATTEMPTS, THEY WERE FORCED TO OPEN A SECOND IMPLANT TO KEEP THE SURGERY GOING, AS THE PATIENT WAS UNDER RETRACTION WITH THE TEDAN LATERAL RETRACTOR AND TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE WHEN UNDER THIS RETRACTION. THERE WAS 2 MINUTES SURGERY DELAYED DUE TO THE REPORTED EVENT. THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED. THERE WERE NO CONSEQUENCES OBSERVED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22183598 ↗
Other Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar devices
- T-PAL 03.812.003Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar152 reports
- T-PAL 03.812.004Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar120 reports
- Catalyft PL Expandable Interbody System 6068073Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar1 recall66 reports
- Catalyft PL Expandable Interbody System 6069076Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar1 recall51 reports
- Catalyft PL Expandable Interbody System 6068076Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar1 recall46 reports
- EIT TLIF Inserter TFT30101EIT Emerging Implant Technologies GmbH · Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar88 reports
- T-PAL 03.812.001Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar76 reports
- Catalyft PL Expandable Interbody System 6069096Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar1 recall25 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page