Skip to content

CONDUIT 187210110Recalls & reported problems

Medos International Sàrl · CONDUIT Lateral System Switch Plate, Two-Hole, Small · Class 2 · Implant

All models of CONDUIT (27)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
8
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 8 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10705034574523), received between Jun 11, 2025 and Dec 26, 2025 — classified as 8 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device-Device Incompatibility” (8 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 1 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 5 reportsNov 2025: 1 reportsDec 2025: 1 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520265
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device-Device Incompatibility8
  • Device Slipped1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions8

Recent adverse event reports

The 8 most recent of 8 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionDec 26, 2025Device Slipped; Device-Device Incompatibility; Device Slipped; Device-Device Incompatibility

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SWITCH PLATE KEPT BECOMING LOOSE TO CAGE AFTER TORQUING MULTIPLE TIMES. HAD TO OPEN ANOTHER IMPLANT TO FINISH CASE. PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH A TEN MINUTE DELAY. THERE WAS NO ADVERSE EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23898486 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 20, 2025Device-Device Incompatibility; Device-Device Incompatibility

    IT WAS REPORTED ON UNKNOWN DATE THAT THE PLATES TORQUED OUT PREMATURELY CAUSING US TO BE UNABLE TO ATTACH THE SWITCHPLATE TO THE CAGE IN A PROPER SECURE FASHION CONSISTENT WITH OUR USAGE OF SAID PRODUCT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23604523 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 24, 2025Device-Device Incompatibility; Device-Device Incompatibility

    IT WAS REPORTED ON (B)(6) 2025, SEVERAL SWITCHPLATES WOULD NOT CONNECT TO THE CAGE. IT SEEMED AS THOUGH THE LOCKING MECHANISMS WERE NOT FUNCTIONING CORRECTLY. WHEN THE CAGE WAS MOVED SLIGHTLY OBLIQUE DURING ATTACHMENT OF THE CAGE TO THE SWITCHPLATE, THIS SEEMED TO ALLOW THE CAMLOCK TIGHTENER TO TURN AND LOCK THE SWITCHPLATE TO THE CAGE. THE CAGE WAS THEN ABLE TO BE STRAIGHTENED AND TIGHTENED UNTIL THE HANDLE TORQUED AND THE CAGE/SWITCHPLATE CONSTRUCT WAS ASSEMBLED SUCCESSFULLY. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH NO DELAY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23380522 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 24, 2025Device-Device Incompatibility; Device-Device Incompatibility

    IT WAS REPORTED ON (B)(6) 2025, SEVERAL SWITCH PLATES WOULD NOT CONNECT TO THE CAGE. IT SEEMED AS THOUGH THE LOCKING MECHANISMS WERE NOT FUNCTIONING CORRECTLY. WHEN THE CAGE WAS MOVED SLIGHTLY OBLIQUE DURING ATTACHMENT OF THE CAGE TO THE SWITCH PLATE, THIS SEEMED TO ALLOW THE CAMLOCK TIGHTENER TO TURN AND LOCK THE SWITCH PLATE TO THE CAGE. THE CAGE WAS THEN ABLE TO BE STRAIGHTENED AND TIGHTENED UNTIL THE HANDLE TORQUED AND THE CAGE/SWITCH PLATE CONSTRUCT WAS ASSEMBLED SUCCESSFULLY. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH NO DELAY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23380491 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 24, 2025Device-Device Incompatibility; Device-Device Incompatibility

    IT WAS REPORTED ON (B)(6) 2025, SEVERAL SWITCHPLATES WOULD NOT CONNECT TO THE CAGE. IT SEEMED AS THOUGH THE LOCKING MECHANISMS WERE NOT FUNCTIONING CORRECTLY. WHEN THE CAGE WAS MOVED SLIGHTLY OBLIQUE DURING ATTACHMENT OF THE CAGE TO THE SWITCHPLATE, THIS SEEMED TO ALLOW THE CAMLOCK TIGHTENER TO TURN AND LOCK THE SWITCHPLATE TO THE CAGE. THE CAGE WAS THEN ABLE TO BE STRAIGHTENED AND TIGHTENED UNTIL THE HANDLE TORQUED AND THE CAGE/SWITCHPLATE CONSTRUCT WAS ASSEMBLED SUCCESSFULLY. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH NO DELAY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23380425 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 24, 2025Device-Device Incompatibility; Device-Device Incompatibility

    IT WAS REPORTED ON (B)(6) 2025, SEVERAL SWITCHPLATES WOULD NOT CONNECT TO THE CAGE. IT SEEMED AS THOUGH THE LOCKING MECHANISMS WERE NOT FUNCTIONING CORRECTLY. WHEN THE CAGE WAS MOVED SLIGHTLY OBLIQUE DURING ATTACHMENT OF THE CAGE TO THE SWITCHPLATE, THIS SEEMED TO ALLOW THE CAMLOCK TIGHTENER TO TURN AND LOCK THE SWITCHPLATE TO THE CAGE. THE CAGE WAS THEN ABLE TO BE STRAIGHTENED AND TIGHTENED UNTIL THE HANDLE TORQUED AND THE CAGE/SWITCHPLATE CONSTRUCT WAS ASSEMBLED SUCCESSFULLY. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH NO DELAY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23380373 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 24, 2025Device-Device Incompatibility; Device-Device Incompatibility

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT WHEN THE TWO HOLE SMALL SWITCHPLATE WAS BEING ATTACHED TO THE CAGE PRIOR TO INSERTION, THE SWITCHPLATE TORQUED OUT PREMATURELY SO THE CAGE AND SWITCHPLATE WOULD NOT ATTACH SECURELY. THE SURGEON TWISTED THE TORQUE HANDLE T-BAR LOCKING MECHANISM BACK AND FORTH AND EVENTUALLY WAS ABLE TO ATTACH THE CAGE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23379189 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 11, 2025Device-Device Incompatibility; Device-Device Incompatibility

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2025 THE SURGEON WAS PERFORMING A L3-L4 PRONE LATERAL SURGERY. AT THE TIME TO IMPLANT THE CAGE AND PLATE, THE SURGICAL TECH WAS UNABLE TO FIX THE TWO-HOLE SMALL SWITCHPLATE TO THE CONDUIT LATERAL CAGE. AFTER 3 OR 4 ATTEMPTS, THEY WERE FORCED TO OPEN A SECOND IMPLANT TO KEEP THE SURGERY GOING, AS THE PATIENT WAS UNDER RETRACTION WITH THE TEDAN LATERAL RETRACTOR AND TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE WHEN UNDER THIS RETRACTION. THERE WAS 2 MINUTES SURGERY DELAYED DUE TO THE REPORTED EVENT. THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED. THERE WERE NO CONSEQUENCES OBSERVED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22183598 ↗

Other Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar devices

All Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page