Skip to content

CONDUIT 187210120Recalls & reported problems

Medos International Sàrl · CONDUIT Lateral System Switch Plate, Two-Hole, Medium · Class 2 · Implant

All models of CONDUIT (27)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10705034574530), received between Nov 20, 2023 and Nov 20, 2023 — classified as 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device-Device Incompatibility” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 2 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device-Device Incompatibility2

Patient problems

  • Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding2

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionNov 20, 2023Device-Device Incompatibility; Device-Device Incompatibility

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON UNKNOWN DATE, THE SURGEON WAS USING MEDIUM 2 HOLE SWITCHPLATE WITH CONDUIT LATERAL INTERBODY AT L3-4 DISC SPACE AND PLACING SECOND 36MM SCREW WHEN SWITCHPLATE DISENGAGED FROM INTERBODY. SURGEON ATTACHED PLATE TO INTERBODY AS PRESCRIBED IN TECHNIQUE GUIDE, MAKING SURE TO LEAVE INTERBODY ¿PROUD¿ FOR EASIER ATTACHMENT, AND CONFIRMED SWITCHPLATE WAS LOCKED AND ATTACHED TO INTERBODY PRIOR TO DISENGAGEMENT. AWL WITH VARIABLE ANGLE GUIDE WAS USED FOR SCREW PATHWAY PREPARATION. FLUORO SHOWED NO GAPS BETWEEN PLATE AND INTERBODY INTERFACE AS WELL. AFTER REMOVING PLATE FROM INCISION SITE, TECH WAS UNABLE TO DISLODGE FIRST 36MM SCREW FROM PLATE EVEN THOUGH CAM-LOC HAD NOT YET BEEN TIGHTENED. THIS RESULTED IN THE PLATE AND SCREWS BEING WASTED AND ANOTHER MEDIUM TWO HOLE PLATE BEING OPENED WITH TWO NEW 36MM BEING USED. SURGEON THEN REATTACHED NEW PLATE TO INTERBODY, WHICH WAS NOW FULLY IN DISC SPACE, AND WAS SUCCESSFULLY ABLE TO REATTACH PLATE TO INTERBODY AND LOCK INTO PLACE ACCORDING TO RECOMMENDED STEPS IN TECHNIQUE GUIDE. SURGEON THEN USED AWL WITH VARIABLE ANGLE GUIDE TO MAKE NEW SCREW TRAJECTORY FOR 36MM CAUDAL SCREW. AS HE INSERTED THE CAUDAL SCREW, THE PLATE DISEN

    Patient problems: Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding

    MAUDE report 18169972 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 20, 2023Device-Device Incompatibility; Device-Device Incompatibility

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON UNKNOWN DATE, THE SURGEON WAS USING MEDIUM 2 HOLE SWITCHPLATE WITH CONDUIT LATERAL INTERBODY AT L3-4 DISC SPACE AND PLACING SECOND 36MM SCREW WHEN SWITCHPLATE DISENGAGED FROM INTERBODY. SURGEON ATTACHED PLATE TO INTERBODY AS PRESCRIBED IN TECHNIQUE GUIDE, MAKING SURE TO LEAVE INTERBODY ¿PROUD¿ FOR EASIER ATTACHMENT, AND CONFIRMED SWITCHPLATE WAS LOCKED AND ATTACHED TO INTERBODY PRIOR TO DISENGAGEMENT. AWL WITH VARIABLE ANGLE GUIDE WAS USED FOR SCREW PATHWAY PREPARATION. FLUORO SHOWED NO GAPS BETWEEN PLATE AND INTERBODY INTERFACE AS WELL. AFTER REMOVING PLATE FROM INCISION SITE, TECH WAS UNABLE TO DISLODGE FIRST 36MM SCREW FROM PLATE EVEN THOUGH CAM-LOC HAD NOT YET BEEN TIGHTENED. THIS RESULTED IN THE PLATE AND SCREWS BEING WASTED AND ANOTHER MEDIUM TWO HOLE PLATE BEING OPENED WITH TWO NEW 36MM BEING USED. SURGEON THEN REATTACHED NEW PLATE TO INTERBODY, WHICH WAS NOW FULLY IN DISC SPACE, AND WAS SUCCESSFULLY ABLE TO REATTACH PLATE TO INTERBODY AND LOCK INTO PLACE ACCORDING TO RECOMMENDED STEPS IN TECHNIQUE GUIDE. SURGEON THEN USED AWL WITH VARIABLE ANGLE GUIDE TO MAKE NEW SCREW TRAJECTORY FOR 36MM CAUDAL SCREW. AS HE INSERTED THE CAUDAL SCREW, THE PLATE DISEN

    Patient problems: Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding

    MAUDE report 18169964 ↗

Other Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar devices

All Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page