NA 04.613.616Recalls & reported problems
Synthes GmbH · 4.0MM TI CERV SELF-RETAIN SCR SLF-TPNG/VARIABLE ANGLE 16MM · Class 2 · Implant
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10705034737812), received between Dec 1, 2017 and Sep 26, 2023 — classified as 2 injuries, 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Compatibility Problem” (3 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Compatibility Problem3
- Migration or Expulsion of Device2
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
- No Code Available2
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionSep 26, 2023Compatibility Problem; Compatibility Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2023, THAT DURING PLACEMENT OF THE VECTRA PLATE AND SCREWS, SURGEON FOUND THAT HE COULD NOT ADVANCE A 4.0 TI CERV SLF RTN SCR SLF-TPNG/VA 16MM SCREW BEYOND THE LOCKING MECHANISM ON THE PLATE. FLUOROSCOPY WAS USED, EVERYTHING LOOKED ACCEPTABLE FOR SCREW PLACEMENT AND ANGULATION. HE REMOVED THE SCREW, AND ATTEMPTED TO PLACE A SHORTER RESCUE SCREW 4.5 TI CERV SLF RTN SCR SLF-TPNG/VA 14MM IN ITS PLACE. THAT SCREW WOULD ALSO NOT PASS THE LOCKING MECHANISM. HE REMOVED THE RESCUE SCREW AND INSPECTED THE PLATE VISUALLY, AND SAW DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THAT SCREW HOLE AND THE OTHERS. HE ELECTED TO REMOVE THE ENTIRE CONSTRUCT AND START NEW. THIS LED TO MORE 4.0 TI CERV SLF RTN SCR SLF-TPNG/VA 16MM IMPLANTS BEING WASTED AND ARE PART OF THIS COMPLAINT. THE SURGERY WAS EASILY COMPLETED WITH A MINIMAL AMOUNT OF EXTRA TIME (UNDER 5 MINUTES). NO FRAGMENTS WERE GENERATED. THERE WAS NO PATIENT OUTCOME. THIS REPORT IS FOR ONE (1) 4.0 TI CERV SLF RTN SCR SLF-TPNG/VA 16MMTHIS IS REPORT 5 OF 5 FOR COMPLAINT (B)(4).
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17821449 ↗MalfunctionSep 26, 2023Compatibility Problem; Compatibility Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6), 2023, THAT DURING PLACEMENT OF THE VECTRA PLATE AND SCREWS, SURGEON FOUND THAT HE COULD NOT ADVANCE A 4.0 TI CERV SLF RTN SCR SLF-TPNG/VA 16MM SCREW BEYOND THE LOCKING MECHANISM ON THE PLATE. FLUOROSCOPY WAS USED, EVERYTHING LOOKED ACCEPTABLE FOR SCREW PLACEMENT AND ANGULATION. HE REMOVED THE SCREW, AND ATTEMPTED TO PLACE A SHORTER RESCUE SCREW 4.5 TI CERV SLF RTN SCR SLF-TPNG/VA 14MM IN ITS PLACE. THAT SCREW WOULD ALSO NOT PASS THE LOCKING MECHANISM. HE REMOVED THE RESCUE SCREW AND INSPECTED THE PLATE VISUALLY, AND SAW DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THAT SCREW HOLE AND THE OTHERS. HE ELECTED TO REMOVE THE ENTIRE CONSTRUCT AND START NEW. THIS LED TO MORE 4.0 TI CERV SLF RTN SCR SLF-TPNG/VA 16MM IMPLANTS BEING WASTED AND ARE PART OF THIS COMPLAINT. THE SURGERY WAS EASILY COMPLETED WITH A MINIMAL AMOUNT OF EXTRA TIME (UNDER 5 MINUTES). NO FRAGMENTS WERE GENERATED. THERE WAS NO PATIENT OUTCOME. THIS REPORT IS FOR ONE (1) 4.0 TI CERV SLF RTN SCR SLF-TPNG/VA 16MM. THIS IS REPORT 4 OF 5 FOR COMPLAINT (B)(4).
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17821448 ↗MalfunctionSep 26, 2023Compatibility Problem; Compatibility Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2023, THAT DURING PLACEMENT OF THE VECTRA PLATE AND SCREWS, SURGEON FOUND THAT HE COULD NOT ADVANCE A 4.0 TI CERV SLF RTN SCR SLF-TPNG/VA 16MM SCREW BEYOND THE LOCKING MECHANISM ON THE PLATE. FLUOROSCOPY WAS USED, EVERYTHING LOOKED ACCEPTABLE FOR SCREW PLACEMENT AND ANGULATION. HE REMOVED THE SCREW, AND ATTEMPTED TO PLACE A SHORTER RESCUE SCREW 4.5 TI CERV SLF RTN SCR SLF-TPNG/VA 14MM IN ITS PLACE. THAT SCREW WOULD ALSO NOT PASS THE LOCKING MECHANISM. HE REMOVED THE RESCUE SCREW AND INSPECTED THE PLATE VISUALLY, AND SAW DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THAT SCREW HOLE AND THE OTHERS. HE ELECTED TO REMOVE THE ENTIRE CONSTRUCT AND START NEW. THIS LED TO MORE 4.0 TI CERV SLF RTN SCR SLF-TPNG/VA 16MM IMPLANTS BEING WASTED AND ARE PART OF THIS COMPLAINT. THE SURGERY WAS EASILY COMPLETED WITH A MINIMAL AMOUNT OF EXTRA TIME (UNDER 5 MINUTES). NO FRAGMENTS WERE GENERATED. THERE WAS NO PATIENT OUTCOME THIS REPORT IS FOR ONE (1) 4.0 TI CERV SLF RTN SCR SLF-TPNG/VA 16MM THIS IS REPORT 2 OF 5 FOR COMPLAINT (B)(4).
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17821440 ↗InjuryDec 1, 2017Migration or Expulsion of Device; Migration or Expulsion of Device
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT RECEIVED ONE (1) VECTRA PLATE AND SIX (6) SCREWS ON (B)(6) 2016. THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED TENDERNESS ON THE BACK OF HER NECK ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND UPON FOLLOW-UP VISIT TO THE SURGEON, DISCOVERED THE SCREWS HAD BACKED OUT OF THE PLATE. THE PATIENT WAS RETURNED TO SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2017 FOR A HARDWARE REMOVAL. ALL IMPLANTED DEVICES WERE REMOVED INTACT AND NO ISSUES DURING REVISION. THE PATIENT DID NOT RECEIVE NEW IMPLANTS SINCE THE WOUND HAD HEALED. THE PROCEDURE WAS UNEVENTFUL WITH A STABLE PATIENT OUTCOME. NO SURGICAL TIME DELAY REPORTED. CONCOMITANT DEVICES REPORTED: VECTRA PLATE (PART# 04.613.136, LOT# UNKNOWN, QUANTITY 1). THIS REPORT IS FOR ONE (1) 4.0MM TI CERV SELF-RETAIN SCREW. THIS IS REPORT 6 OF 6 FOR (B)(4).
Patient problems: No Code Available
MAUDE report 7074603 ↗InjuryDec 1, 2017Migration or Expulsion of Device; Migration or Expulsion of Device
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT RECEIVED ONE (1) VECTRA PLATE AND SIX (6) SCREWS ON (B)(6) 2016. THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED TENDERNESS ON THE BACK OF HER NECK ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND UPON FOLLOW-UP VISIT TO THE SURGEON, DISCOVERED THE SCREWS HAD BACKED OUT OF THE PLATE. THE PATIENT WAS RETURNED TO SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2017 FOR A HARDWARE REMOVAL. ALL IMPLANTED DEVICES WERE REMOVED INTACT AND NO ISSUES DURING REVISION. THE PATIENT DID NOT RECEIVE NEW IMPLANTS SINCE THE WOUND HAD HEALED. THE PROCEDURE WAS UNEVENTFUL WITH A STABLE PATIENT OUTCOME. NO SURGICAL TIME DELAY REPORTED. CONCOMITANT DEVICES REPORTED: VECTRA PLATE (PART# 04.613.136, LOT# UNKNOWN, QUANTITY 1). THIS REPORT IS FOR ONE (1) 4.0MM TI CERV SELF-RETAIN SCREW. THIS IS REPORT 5 OF 6 FOR (B)(4).
Patient problems: No Code Available
MAUDE report 7074598 ↗
Other APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERVERTEBRAL BODY devices
- CD HORIZON® SOLERA® VOYAGER™ Spinal System 6550017Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Appliance, fixation, spinal intervertebral body131 reports
- EVEREST® Spinal System 2901-10001VB Spine LLC · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERVERTEBRAL BODY119 reports
- ZEVO™ Anterior Cervical Plate System 7710015Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERVERTEBRAL BODY1 recall1 report
- Mariner RDX MX1-000040Seaspine Orthopedics Corporation · Appliance, fixation, spinal intervertebral body1 recall0 reports
- Mariner RDX MX1-000030Seaspine Orthopedics Corporation · Appliance, fixation, spinal intervertebral body1 recall0 reports
- Elegance® Anterior Cervical Plate 53430112Clariance · Appliance, Fixation, Spinal Intervertebral Body1 recall0 reports
- Elegance® Anterior Cervical Plate 53430224Clariance · Appliance, Fixation, Spinal Intervertebral Body1 recall0 reports
- XLP 7565050Nuvasive, Inc. · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERVERTEBRAL BODY1 recall0 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page