NA 04.614.522Recalls & reported problems
Synthes GmbH · TI TRANSCONNECTOR LOCKING SCREW · Class 2 · Implant
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10705034739366), received between Feb 7, 2020 and Feb 7, 2020 — classified as 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Handling Problem” (3 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Device Handling Problem3
Patient problems
- No Patient Involvement3
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionFeb 7, 2020Device Handling Problem; Device Handling Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2020, THE SURGEON WAS PERFORMING C2-6 POSTERIOR CERVICAL FUSION PROCEDURE USING THE 4.0 SYNAPSE SYSTEM. NEAR THE END OF THE CASE, AFTER THE SURGEON APPLIED TWO TRANSCONNECTOR LOCKING SET SCREWS AND EIGHT (8) TITANIUM LOCKING SCREWS TO THE REMAINING SCREWS, THE DOCTOR THEN FINALLY TIGHTENED ALL TEN (10) SET SCREWS. THE PHYSICIAN ATTEMPTED TO SEAT A MEDIUM SYNAPSE TOP LOADING TRANSCONNECTOR TO THE TRANSCONNECTOR SET SCREWS. HE THEN APPLIED A 7.5MM TRANSCONNECTOR LOCKING NUT TO THE LEFT SIDE OF THE TRANSCONNECTOR BUT WHEN HE ATTEMPTED TO APPLY AND SEAT THE RIGHT SIDE THE TRANSCONNECTOR WOULD NOT SEAT. HE LOOSENED THE NUT ON THE LEFT SIDE TO SEE IF THAT WOULD HELP, BUT IT WOULD NOT SEAT. HE TRIED THIS A NUMBER OF TIMES, BUT IT CLEARLY WOULDN¿T SEAT PROPERLY. THEY USED MEDIUM ANGLED TOP LOADING TRANSCONNECTOR BUT HAD THE SAME RESULT. WHEN HE WAS REMOVING THE 7.5MM BUT IT WOULD NOT RELEASE AND HE SAID IT FELT AS IF THE HEAD OF THE PEDICLE SCREW SPLAYED OPEN. HE DECIDED TO REMOVE THE TRANSCONNECTOR NUTS, LOCKING SCREWS AND THE TRANSCONNECTOR AND SIMPLY USE JUST THE STANDARD TITANIUM LOCKING SCREWS. HE WANTS TO KNOW WHY THE TRANSCONNECTOR WOULD NOT SEAT AND I
Patient problems: No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 9684099 ↗MalfunctionFeb 7, 2020Device Handling Problem; Device Handling Problem
CONCOMITANT DEVICES REPORTED: TRANSCONNECTOR LOCKING SET SCREW (PART# UNKNOWN, LOT# UNKNOWN, QUANTITY UNKNOWN); TITANIUM LOCKING SCREWS (PART# UNKNOWN, LOT# UNKNOWN, QUANTITY UNKNOWN); TRANSCONNECTOR NUT DRIVER (PART# UNKNOWN, LOT# UNKNOWN, QUANTITY 1); PEDICLE SCREW (PART# UNKNOWN, LOT# UNKNOWN, QUANTITY UNKNOWN); TI TRANSCONNECTOR LOCKING SCREW (PART # 04.614.522, LOT # UNKNOWN, QUANTITY 2); TI TRANSCONNECTOR LOCKING NUT 7.5MM ( PART # 04.614.521, LOT # UNKNOWN, QUANTITY 3); ANGLED TI TOP LOADING TRANSCONNECTOR/MEDIUM (PART # 04.614.551, LOT #: 7348874, QUANTITY: 1), TI TOP LOADING TRANSCONNECTOR MEDIUM (PART # 04.614.516, LOT #: 22P8031, QUANTITY: 1).
Patient problems: No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 9684098 ↗MalfunctionFeb 7, 2020Device Handling Problem; Device Handling Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2020, THE SURGEON WAS PERFORMING C2-6 POSTERIOR CERVICAL FUSION PROCEDURE USING THE 4.0 SYNAPSE SYSTEM. NEAR THE END OF THE CASE, AFTER THE SURGEON APPLIED TWO TRANSCONNECTOR LOCKING SET SCREWS AND EIGHT (8) TITANIUM LOCKING SCREWS TO THE REMAINING SCREWS, THE DOCTOR THEN FINALLY TIGHTENED ALL TEN (10) SET SCREWS. THE PHYSICIAN ATTEMPTED TO SEAT A MEDIUM SYNAPSE TOP LOADING TRANSCONNECTOR TO THE TRANSCONNECTOR SET SCREWS. HE THEN APPLIED A 7.5MM TRANSCONNECTOR LOCKING NUT TO THE LEFT SIDE OF THE TRANSCONNECTOR BUT WHEN HE ATTEMPTED TO APPLY AND SEAT THE RIGHT SIDE THE TRANSCONNECTOR WOULD NOT SEAT. HE LOOSENED THE NUT ON THE LEFT SIDE TO SEE IF THAT WOULD HELP, BUT IT WOULD NOT SEAT. HE TRIED THIS A NUMBER OF TIMES, BUT IT CLEARLY WOULDN¿T SEAT PROPERLY. THEY USED MEDIUM ANGLED TOP LOADING TRANSCONNECTOR BUT HAD THE SAME RESULT. WHEN HE WAS REMOVING THE 7.5MM BUT IT WOULD NOT RELEASE AND HE SAID IT FELT AS IF THE HEAD OF THE PEDICLE SCREW SPLAYED OPEN. HE DECIDED TO REMOVE THE TRANSCONNECTOR NUTS, LOCKING SCREWS AND THE TRANSCONNECTOR AND SIMPLY USE JUST THE STANDARD TITANIUM LOCKING SCREWS. HE WANTS TO KNOW WHY THE TRANSCONNECTOR WOULD NOT SEAT AND I
Patient problems: No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 9684095 ↗
Other ORTHOSIS, SPINAL PEDICLE FIXATION devices
- NA 04.614.508Synthes GmbH · ORTHOSIS, SPINAL PEDICLE FIXATION277 reports
- CREO 1134.0010Globus Medical, Inc. · ORTHOSIS, SPINAL PEDICLE FIXATION112 reports
- CREO 1119.0010Globus Medical, Inc. · ORTHOSIS, SPINAL PEDICLE FIXATION80 reports
- VIPER 186731745Medos International Sàrl · ORTHOSIS, SPINAL PEDICLE FIXATION43 reports
- CD HORIZON® Spinal System 1553201090Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · ORTHOSIS, SPINAL PEDICLE FIXATION38 reports
- EXPEDIUM 179902000Medos International Sàrl · ORTHOSIS, SPINAL PEDICLE FIXATION37 reports
- CD HORIZON® Spinal System 7540220Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · ORTHOSIS, SPINAL PEDICLE FIXATION36 reports
- EXPEDIUM VERSE 199721640Medos International Sàrl · ORTHOSIS, SPINAL PEDICLE FIXATION35 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page