NA 498.866Recalls & reported problems
Synthes GmbH · 8.0MM TI SIDE-OPENING SCREW 60MM · Class 2 · Implant
Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 10705034791852), received between Jun 6, 2017 and Jun 6, 2017 — classified as 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break1
Patient problems
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJun 6, 2017Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON AN UNKNOWN DATE IN 2014, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A L5-S1 ANTERIOR LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION (ALIF) WITH THE SYNTHES SYNFIX-LR DEVICE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT ACCORDING TO THE PHYSICIAN, THE PATIENT NEVER DEVELOPED A SOLID FUSION AFTER THE INITIAL SURGERY AND THAT THE PATIENT HAD RADICULAR PAIN. REPORTEDLY, PATIENT HAD RADICULOPATHY. NO ISSUES WITH THE SYNFIX-LR HARDWARE WERE REPORTED. THE SURGEON PLANNED TO PERFORM A POSTERIOR SPINAL FUSION WITH SYNTHES USS AND PERFORM A DECOMPRESSION. PATIENT UNDERWENT REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2017. DURING THE REVISION SURGERY, THE SURGEON PLACED THE L5-S1 USS SCREWS. WHILE INSERTING THE RIGHT S1 USS SCREW (498.866), THE TOP PART OF THE SCREW THAT ENGAGES THE ¿IMPLANT HOLDER / STICK 388.61¿ BROKE OFF. THIS PIECE WAS RETRIEVED. TWO OF THE 388.61 STICKS ALSO BROKE TRYING TO GET THE SCREW OUT ¿ THE TABS THAT ENGAGE THE TOP OF THE SCREW BROKE OFF. ALL FRAGMENTS WERE RETRIEVED FROM THE PATIENT. THERE WAS A TREMENDOUS AMOUNT OF TORQUE THAT WAS PLACED ON THE SCREW AND THE STICKS THAT CONTRIBUTED TO THE BREAKAGES. THE SURGEON THOUGHT THAT THE USS SCREW WAS HITTING ON THE SYNFIX SCREW IN S1 CONTRIBUTING TO THE HIGH TORQUE. HE THEN USED A
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 6614995 ↗
Other APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERVERTEBRAL BODY devices
- CD HORIZON® SOLERA® VOYAGER™ Spinal System 6550017Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Appliance, fixation, spinal intervertebral body131 reports
- EVEREST® Spinal System 2901-10001VB Spine LLC · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERVERTEBRAL BODY119 reports
- ZEVO™ Anterior Cervical Plate System 7710015Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERVERTEBRAL BODY1 recall1 report
- Elegance® Anterior Cervical Plate 53430353Clariance · Appliance, Fixation, Spinal Intervertebral Body1 recall0 reports
- Elegance® Anterior Cervical Plate 53430108Clariance · Appliance, Fixation, Spinal Intervertebral Body1 recall0 reports
- Elegance® Anterior Cervical Plate 53430114Clariance · Appliance, Fixation, Spinal Intervertebral Body1 recall0 reports
- Elegance® Anterior Cervical Plate 53430240Clariance · Appliance, Fixation, Spinal Intervertebral Body1 recall0 reports
- Elegance® Anterior Cervical Plate 53430236Clariance · Appliance, Fixation, Spinal Intervertebral Body1 recall0 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 13, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 13, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page