Skip to content

EnVista MX60 IOL MX60TP275+130Recalls & reported problems

Bausch & Lomb Incorporated · MX60TP275 12.5MM +13.0 · Class 3 · Implant

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 10757770517487), received between Apr 17, 2024 and Apr 17, 2024 — classified as 1 injury.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Eject” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 1 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Failure to Eject1
  • Insufficient Device Problem Information1

Patient problems

  • Capsular Bag Tear1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryApr 17, 2024Insufficient Device Problem Information; Failure to Eject; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Failure to Eject

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A CATARACT SURGERY THE INTRAOCULAR LENS WAS STUCK IN THE INJECTOR. THE INJECTOR WAS REMOVED FROM THE EYE, THE IOL WAS REMOVED FROM THE INJECTOR AND TRANSFERRED TO ANOTHER INJECTOR OF A DIFFERENT MODEL. DURING THE IMPLANTATION WITH THE REPLACEMENT INJECTOR A RUPTURED POSTERIOR CAPSULE WAS OBSERVED. AN ANTERIOR VITRECTOMY WAS PERFORMED TO REMOVE THE VITREOUS. THE MAIN INCISION WAS ENLARGED BEFORE THE IOL IMPLANTATION. THE LENS REMAINS IMPLANTED IN THE EYE AND A FOLLOW-UP APPOINTMENT IS PLANNED TO CHECK THAT THE LENS IS IN THE CORRECT POSITION. ALTHOUGH REQUESTED ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS NOT OBTAINED.

    Patient problems: Capsular Bag Tear

    MAUDE report 19123076 ↗

Other Intraocular Lens devices

All Intraocular Lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page