Skip to content

enVista® IOL MX60E (REF MXUE2250)Recalls & reported problems

Bausch & Lomb Incorporated · enVista one-piece hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens +22.50D · Class 3 · Implant

All models of enVista IOL (74)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
4
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10757770531414), received between Dec 20, 2023 and Sep 8, 2025 — classified as 4 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 1 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 1 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 1 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 1 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
  • Break1
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1

Patient problems

  • Insufficient Information2
  • Capsular Bag Tear1
  • Visual Disturbances1
  • Visual Impairment1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjurySep 8, 2025Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT APPROXIMATELY 3 YEARS AFTER IMPLANTATION OF AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) INTO THE RIGHT EYE (OD), THE LENS WAS REMOVED, A VITRECTOMY WAS PERFORMED, AND A DIFFERENT MODEL IOL WAS IMPLANTED. IN THE SURGEON'S OPINION, THE MOST LIKELY CAUSE OF THE EVENT IS THE LENS DISLODGED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 22993485 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 11, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT APPROXIMATIVELY 17 MONTHS AFTER THE IMPLANTATION OF AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) INTO THE LEFT EYE, THE LENS WAS EXCHANGED WITH A DIFFERENT MODEL IOL DUE TO DYSPHOTOPSIAS. REPORTEDLY, THE PATIENT NOTICED A DECREASE IN VISION, COMPLAINING OF SHADOWS TEMPORALLY. IN THE SURGEON¿S OPINION, THE MOST LIKELY CAUSE OF THE EVENT WAS DYSPHOTOPSIA. PATIENT OUTCOME IS GOOD.

    Patient problems: Visual Disturbances; Visual Impairment

    MAUDE report 21357659 ↗
  • InjuryApr 23, 2024Break; Break

    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED INDICATING AN ANTERIOR CAPSULAR TEAR OCCURRED PRIOR TO INSERTION OF THE INTRAOCULAR LENS.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 19167122 ↗
  • InjuryDec 20, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE IMPLANTATION OF AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) INTO THE RIGHT EYE, THE CAPSULAR BAG COLLAPSED WHEN THE LENS WAS PLACED INTO THE EYE. THE IOL WAS REMOVED, AND A BACKUP LENS OF A DIFFERENT MODEL WAS SUCCESSFULLY IMPLANTED. THE PATIENT OUTCOME IS GOOD.

    Patient problems: Capsular Bag Tear

    MAUDE report 18368119 ↗

Other intraocular lens devices

All intraocular lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page