Skip to content

enVista® IOL MX60E (REF MXUE2500)Recalls & reported problems

Bausch & Lomb Incorporated · enVista one-piece hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens +25.00D · Class 3 · Implant

All models of enVista IOL (74)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10757770531513), received between Apr 9, 2024 and Apr 23, 2025 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 1 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 1 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Insufficient Device Problem Information1

Patient problems

  • Swelling/ Edema1
  • Toxic Anterior Segment Syndrome (TASS)1
  • Visual Disturbances1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryApr 23, 2025Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THREE DAYS AFTER AN IMPLANTATION OF AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IN THE LEFT EYE, THE PATIENT WAS SUSPECTED OF HAVING TOXIC ANTERIOR SEGMENT SYNDROME (TASS) OR ENDOPHTHALMITIS. SLIT LAMP FINDINGS WERE 0.5MM HYPOPYON, 4+CELL IN AC, POSTERIOR VITREOUS QUIET, CORNEAL AND EPI-DEFECT. A VITRECTOMY WAS PERFORMED AND INTRAOCULAR INJECTIONS OF ANTIBIOTICS WERE ADMINISTERED. THE PATIENT'S BCVA DECREASED DUE TO POST-OP SWELLING AND REACTION TO TASS. IN THE SURGEON¿S OPINION, THE MOST LIKELY CAUSE OF THE EVENT IS TASS OR ENDOPHTHALMITIS. THE PATIENT'S OUTCOME IS GOOD. THE FOLLOWING MEDICATIONS WERE PRESCRIBED (FOR USE AT HOME POST-OPERATIVELY): SYMBRENZA, VIGAMOX, PROLENSA, DUREZOL AND MOXIFLOXACIN WERE GIVEN POSTOPERATIVELY.

    Patient problems: Swelling/ Edema; Toxic Anterior Segment Syndrome (TASS)

    MAUDE report 21896620 ↗
  • InjuryApr 9, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED NINE MONTHS AFTER ORIGINAL IMPLANT OF AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) INTO THE EYE, A LENS EXCHANGE USING A DIFFERENT MODEL LENS AND DIOPTER WAS COMPLETED DUE TO PERSISTENT POSITIVE DYSPHOTOPSIA. DYSPHOTOPSIA RESOLVED WITH LENS EXCHANGE AND THE PATIENT'S PROGNOSIS IS EXCELLENT. IN THE SURGEON'S OPINION, DYSPHOTOPSIA IS SECONDARY TO ACRYLIC IOL. IT IMPROVED/RESOLVED WITH EXCHANGE TO SILICONE OPTIC MATERIAL.

    Patient problems: Visual Disturbances

    MAUDE report 19071616 ↗

Other intraocular lens devices

All intraocular lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page