enVista® IOL EE (REF EEU2150)Recalls & reported problems
Bausch & Lomb Incorporated · enVista hydrophobic acrylic IOL (non-preloaded) +21.50D · Class 3 · Implant
1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 1
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 10757770607904), received between Jun 5, 2026 and Jun 5, 2026 — classified as 1 injury.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (1 report).
1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Reports received per month
Recalls naming this device
- Mar 27, 2025Open, Classified
In response to an increased number of reports of toxic anterior segment syndrome (TASS) in conjunction with implantation of enVista Aspire and enVista Envy IOLs, and certain enVista monofocal lenses in the U.S.
Z-1679-2025 · Root cause: Process control · FDA record ↗
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
- Migration1
Patient problems
- Blurred Vision1
- Foreign Body Sensation in Eye1
- Swelling/ Edema1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJun 5, 2026Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Migration
IT WAS REPORTED THAT ONE DAY AFTER IMPLANTATION OF AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IN THE RIGHT EYE (OD), THE PATIENT HAD CLOUDY VISION AND FOREIGN BODY SENSATION IN THE OPERATED EYE. PER THE SURGEON THE LENS BECAME DISLOCATED. TWO DAYS POSTOPERATIVELY, A SECONDARY PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED TO REPOSITION THE IOL WITH NO SUCCESS. APPROXIMATELY ONE WEEK POST ORIGINAL IMPLANT, THE IOL WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH A DIFFERENT MODEL LENS. THE PATIENT SUBSEQUENTLY EXPERIENCED POSTOPERATIVE INFLAMMATION WHICH WAS TREATED WITH STEROID/ANTIBIOTICS DROPS AS EXPECTED AND CONSISTENT WITH THE STANDARD COURSE OF MULTIPLE PROCEDURES.
Patient problems: Blurred Vision; Foreign Body Sensation in Eye; Swelling/ Edema
MAUDE report 25414130 ↗
Other intraocular lens devices
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens146 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens145 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens144 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens139 reports
- TECNIS SIMPLICITY DIB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens1 recall81 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens129 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens127 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens126 reports
Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.