enVista Envy™ IOL (REF ENU1750)Recalls & reported problems
Bausch & Lomb Incorporated · enVista Envy hydrophobic acrylic IOL (non-preloaded) +17.50D · Class 3 · Implant
1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 1
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 10757770637215), received between May 19, 2025 and May 19, 2025 — classified as 1 injury.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Integrity Problem” (1 report).
1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Reports received per month
Recalls naming this device
- Mar 27, 2025Open, Classified
In response to an increased number of reports of toxic anterior segment syndrome (TASS) in conjunction with implantation of enVista Aspire and enVista Envy IOLs, and certain enVista monofocal lenses in the U.S.
Z-1680-2025 · Root cause: Process control · FDA record ↗
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Material Integrity Problem1
Patient problems
- Visual Disturbances1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryMay 19, 2025Material Integrity Problem; Material Integrity Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT APPROXIMATELY 4 WEEKS AFTER IMPLANTATION OF AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) INTO THE RIGHT EYE (OD), THE PATIENT COMPLAINED OF POOR VISION AND STATED HE FELT LIKE HIS RIGHT EYE WAS SEEING UNDERWATER. UPON EVALUATION THE SURGEON NOTICED A SLIGHT IRREGULARITY OR POSSIBLE OPTICAL ABERRATION IN THE CENTRAL OPTIC OF THE LENS DESCRIBED AS A SLIGHT DENT THAT IN HIS OPINION WAS IMPACTING THE PATIENT'S VISION. THE LENS WAS EXCHANGED, APPROXIMATELY TWO WEEKS LATER WITH A DIFFERENT MODEL IOL, AND PATIENT OUTCOME POST EXCHANGE IS REPORTED AS GOOD.
Patient problems: Visual Disturbances
MAUDE report 22048826 ↗
Other Lens, Multifocal Intraocular devices
- Clareon™ CNA0T0Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Lens, multifocal intraocular144 reports
- Clareon™ CNA0T0Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Lens, multifocal intraocular1 recall66 reports
- Clareon™ CNA0T0Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Lens, multifocal intraocular113 reports
- Clareon™ CNA0T0Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Lens, multifocal intraocular112 reports
- Clareon™ CNA0T0Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Lens, multifocal intraocular110 reports
- Clareon™ CNA0T0Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Lens, multifocal intraocular107 reports
- Clareon™ CNA0T0Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Lens, multifocal intraocular104 reports
- Clareon™ CNA0T0Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Lens, multifocal intraocular93 reports
Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.