enVista Envy™ IOL (REF ENU2300)Recalls & reported problems
Bausch & Lomb Incorporated · enVista Envy hydrophobic acrylic IOL (non-preloaded) +23.00D · Class 3 · Implant
1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 1
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10757770637314), received between Mar 18, 2026 and Aug 25, 2026 — classified as 2 injuries.
1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Reports received per month
Recalls naming this device
- Mar 27, 2025Open, Classified
In response to an increased number of reports of toxic anterior segment syndrome (TASS) in conjunction with implantation of enVista Aspire and enVista Envy IOLs, and certain enVista monofocal lenses in the U.S.
Z-1680-2025 · Root cause: Process control · FDA record ↗
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
Patient problems
- Insufficient Information1
- Visual Disturbances1
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryAug 25, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
It was reported that approximately 9 months after implantation of an intraocular lens (IOL) in the left eye (OS), the lens was explanted.This report is for the left eye (OS). Right eye (OD) reference: (b)(4).
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 50428792 ↗InjuryMar 18, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE HEALTHCARE FACILITY REPORTED THAT AFTER IMPLANTATION OF AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) INTO THE PATIENT¿S LEFT EYE, THE PATIENT REPORTED THEIR VISION WAS GRAYED OUT AND CLOUDY. DESPITE ACHIEVING UNCORRECTED VISUAL ACUITY OF 20/20 AND J1, THE PATIENT REPORTED INADEQUATE FUNCTIONAL VISION. TWO MONTHS LATER, THE SURGEON PERFORMED AN IOL EXCHANGE FOR A NON-MULTIFOCAL IOL DUE TO THE PATIENT EXPERIENCING CONTRAST ISSUES. THE PATIENT HAS CLEARER VISION POST LENS EXCHANGE.
Patient problems: Visual Disturbances
MAUDE report 24632924 ↗
Other Lens, Multifocal Intraocular devices
- Clareon™ CNA0T0Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Lens, multifocal intraocular144 reports
- Clareon™ CNA0T0Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Lens, multifocal intraocular1 recall66 reports
- Clareon™ CNA0T0Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Lens, multifocal intraocular113 reports
- Clareon™ CNA0T0Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Lens, multifocal intraocular112 reports
- Clareon™ CNA0T0Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Lens, multifocal intraocular110 reports
- Clareon™ CNA0T0Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Lens, multifocal intraocular107 reports
- Clareon™ CNA0T0Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Lens, multifocal intraocular104 reports
- Clareon™ CNA0T0Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Lens, multifocal intraocular93 reports
Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.