Skip to content

enVista Envy™ Toric IOL ETN (REF ETNU200+220)Recalls & reported problems

Bausch & Lomb Incorporated · enVista Envy toric hydrophobic acrylic IOL (non-preloaded) +22.00D SE / +2.00D CYL · Class 3 · Implant

All models of enVista Envy Toric IOL (513)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
1

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 10757770641465), received between Jan 15, 2026 and Jan 15, 2026 — classified as 1 injury.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (1 report).

1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 1 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Recalls naming this device

  1. Mar 27, 2025Class IOpen, Classified

    In response to an increased number of reports of toxic anterior segment syndrome (TASS) in conjunction with implantation of enVista Aspire and enVista Envy IOLs, and certain enVista monofocal lenses in the U.S.

    Z-1680-2025 · Root cause: Process control · Recall details · FDA record ↗

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1

Patient problems

  • Capsular Contracture1
  • Inflammation1
  • Visual Impairment1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJan 15, 2026Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT APPROXIMATELY ONE MONTH AFTER IMPLANTATION OF AN INTRAOCULAR (IOL) LENS IN THE LEFT EYE (OS), THE SURGEON NOTED SUPERIOR DECENTRATION OF THE IOL AND CAPSULAR PHIMOSIS DURING SLIT LAMP EXAMINATION. THE PATIENT'S BEST CORRECTED VISUAL ACUITY (BCVA) DECREASED FROM 20/20 TO 20/25. APPROXIMATELY SIX WEEKS AFTER ONSET OF THE ISSUE, THE IOL WAS EXCHANGED FOR THE SAME MODEL WITH A DIFFERENT DIOPTER. ONE WEEK FOLLOWING THE EXCHANGE PROCEDURE, A YAG LASER CAPSULOTOMY WAS PERFORMED. THE PATIENT SUBSEQUENTLY RECOVERED. ACCORDING TO THE SURGEON, THE MOST LIKELY CAUSE OF THE EVENT WAS A CHRONIC INFLAMMATORY STIMULUS FROM THE LENS, NOTING FINDINGS OF 1+ CELLS ON POSTOPERATIVE DAY 1 AND AT THE TIME OF YAG TREATMENT. THE FOLLOWING MEDICATIONS WERE PRESCRIBED FOR USE AT HOME POST-OPERATIVELY: PROLENSA QD X 4 WEEKS. PRED 1% QID X 4 WEEKS-TAPER.

    Patient problems: Capsular Contracture; Inflammation; Visual Impairment

    MAUDE report 24085077 ↗

Other Lens, Multifocal Intraocular devices

All Lens, Multifocal Intraocular devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page