Skip to content

VITROS 6801861Recalls & reported problems

Ortho Clinical Diagnostics · VITROS Immunodiagnostic Products Anti-HIV 1+2 Reagent Pack · Class 2

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10758750001521), received between Aug 3, 2023 and May 7, 2026 — classified as 6 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “False Negative Result” (6 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 2 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 1 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • False Negative Result6

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions6

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMay 7, 2026False Negative Result

    A CUSTOMER CONTACTED (B)(6) TO REPORT DISCORDANT, NON-REACTIVE (NEGATIVE) VITROS ANTI-HIV (AHIV) RESULTS OBTAINED FROM A SINGLE PATIENT SAMPLE PROCESSED USING VITROS IMMUNODIAGNOSTIC PRODUCTS ANTI-HIV 1+2 REAGENT LOT 4450 ON A VITROS 3600 IMMUNODIAGNOSTIC SYSTEM. THE RESULTS WERE CONSIDERED DISCORDANT WHEN COMPARED TO THE RESULTS USING A NON-VITROS ABBOTT METHOD AND FROM AN UNKNOWN CONFIRMATORY TESTING METHOD OBTAINED FROM THE SAME SAMPLE. PATIENT SAMPLE VITROS RESULTS OF NON-REACTIVE VERSUS THE EXPECTED RESULT OF REACTIVE. BIASED RESULTS OF THE MAGNITUDE AND DIRECTION OBSERVED MAY LEAD TO INAPPROPRIATE PHYSICIAN ACTION IF THEY WERE TO OCCUR UNDETECTED. THE NON-REACTIVE VITROS AHIV RESULTS WERE NOT REPORTED FROM THE LABORATORY. THERE HAVE BEEN NO ALLEGATIONS OF PATIENT HARM AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. THIS REPORT CORRESPONDS TO ORTHO CLINICAL DIAGNOSTICS INC (ORTHO) COMPLAINT NUMBER (B)(4) AND REPORTABILITY ASSESSMENT (B)(4).

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25112115 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 18, 2024False Negative Result; False Negative Result

    A CUSTOMER CONTACTED THE ORTHO CLINICAL DIAGNOSTICS (ORTHO) TECHNICAL SOLUTION CENTER (TSC) TO REPORT DISCORDANT, NEGATIVE AHIV RESULTS WERE OBTAINED WHEN A SINGLE PROFICIENCY SAMPLE WAS TESTED USING VITROS ANTI-HIV 1 + 2 (AHIV) LOT 4370 ACROSS A VITROS ECIQ IMMUNODIAGNOSTIC SYSTEM AND A VITROS 3600 IMMUNODIAGNOSTIC SYSTEM. THE RESULTS WERE DISCORDANT WHEN COMPARED TO VITROS PEER RESULTS FOR THE SAME PROFICIENCY SAMPLE AND A NON-VITROS ABBOTT RESULT FOR THE SAME PROFICIENCY SAMPLE. BIORAD EQAS (REFERENCE 12000815, LOT 330800) SAMPLE 8 RESULTS OF 0.19 AND 0.19 S/C (NEGATIVE) VERSUS AN EXPECTED RESULT OF REACTIVE BIASED RESULTS OF THE MAGNITUDE AND DIRECTION OBSERVED MAY LEAD TO INAPPROPRIATE PHYSICIAN ACTION IF THEY WERE TO OCCUR UNDETECTED ON PATIENT SAMPLES. THE DISCORDANT, NEGATIVE VITROS AHIV RESULTS WERE FROM A NON-PATIENT FLUID AND WERE REPORTED TO THE PROFICIENCY PROVIDER. THE CUSTOMER DID NOT GIVE ANY INDICATION THAT PATIENT RESULTS HAD BEEN AFFECTED AND THERE IS NO ALLEGATION OF PATIENT HARM AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. THIS REPORT IS NUMBER TWO OF TWO MDRS FOR THIS EVENT. TWO 3500A FORMS ARE BEING SUBMITTED FOR THIS EVENT AS TWO DEVICES WERE INVOLVED. THIS REPORT CORRESPONDS

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20712416 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 18, 2024False Negative Result; False Negative Result

    A CUSTOMER CONTACTED THE ORTHO CLINICAL DIAGNOSTICS (ORTHO) TECHNICAL SOLUTION CENTER (TSC) TO REPORT DISCORDANT, NEGATIVE AHIV RESULTS WERE OBTAINED WHEN A SINGLE PROFICIENCY SAMPLE WAS TESTED USING VITROS ANTI-HIV 1 + 2 (AHIV) LOT 4370 ACROSS A VITROS ECIQ IMMUNODIAGNOSTIC SYSTEM AND A VITROS 3600 IMMUNODIAGNOSTIC SYSTEM. THE RESULTS WERE DISCORDANT WHEN COMPARED TO VITROS PEER RESULTS FOR THE SAME PROFICIENCY SAMPLE AND A NON-VITROS ABBOTT RESULT FOR THE SAME PROFICIENCY SAMPLE. BIORAD EQAS (REFERENCE 12000815, LOT 330800) SAMPLE 8 RESULTS OF 0.19 AND 0.19 S/C (NEGATIVE) VERSUS AN EXPECTED RESULT OF REACTIVE BIASED RESULTS OF THE MAGNITUDE AND DIRECTION OBSERVED MAY LEAD TO INAPPROPRIATE PHYSICIAN ACTION IF THEY WERE TO OCCUR UNDETECTED ON PATIENT SAMPLES. THE DISCORDANT, NEGATIVE VITROS AHIV RESULTS WERE FROM A NON-PATIENT FLUID AND WERE REPORTED TO THE PROFICIENCY PROVIDER. THE CUSTOMER DID NOT GIVE ANY INDICATION THAT PATIENT RESULTS HAD BEEN AFFECTED AND THERE IS NO ALLEGATION OF PATIENT HARM AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. THIS REPORT IS NUMBER ONE OF TWO MDRS FOR THIS EVENT. TWO 3500A FORMS ARE BEING SUBMITTED FOR THIS EVENT AS TWO DEVICES WERE INVOLVED. THIS REPORT CORRESPONDS

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20712320 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 3, 2023False Negative Result; False Negative Result

    THE INVESTIGATION DETERMINED THAT FALSE NEGATIVE VITROS ANTI-HIV 1 & 2 (AHIV1+2) RESULTS WERE OBTAINED FROM TWO DIFFERENT LOTS OF VITROS AHIV1+2 REAGENT WHEN TESTING USING A NON-VITROS BIORAD QUALITY CONTROL (QC) FLUID ON TWO DIFFERENT VITROS 5600 INTEGRATED SYSTEMS. VITROS ANTI-HIV 1 & 2 LOT 1110: VIROTROL I: VITROS AHIV1+2 ON INST J1 OF 0.58, 0.60, 0.57, 0.62, 0.60, 0.58, 0.61, 0.58, 0.57 AND 0.57 S/C (NEGATIVE) VERSUS THE EXPECTED RESULT OF REACTIVE (>/=1.00) VIROTROL I: VITROS AHIV1+2 ON INST J2 OF 0.42, 0.44, 0.53, 0.15, 0.15, 0.15, 0.57 AND 0.31 S/C (NEGATIVE) VERSUS THE EXPECTED RESULT OF REACTIVE (>/=1.00) VITROS ANTI-HIV 1 & 2 LOT 1100: VIROTROL II: VITROS AHIV1+2 ON INST J2 OF 0.44, 0.43 AND 0.44 S/C (NEGATIVE) VERSUS THE EXPECTED RESULT OF REACTIVE (>/=1.00) BIASED RESULTS OF THE MAGNITUDE AND DIRECTION OBSERVED MAY LEAD TO INAPPROPRIATE PHYSICIAN ACTION IF THEY WERE TO OCCUR UNDETECTED. THE FALSE NEGATIVE RESULTS OCCURRED ONLY OF QUALITY CONTROL FLUIDS. THE CUSTOMER PROCESSED PATIENT TESTING USING VITROS HIV1+2 LOT 1100 AND THERE WAS NO ALLEGATION OF PATIENT HARM. THE CUSTOMER DID NOT USE THE VITROS HIV1+2 LOT 1110 REAGENT LOT TO RUN PATIENT SAMPLES BECAUSE OF THE ISSUE

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17451636 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 3, 2023False Negative Result; False Negative Result

    THE INVESTIGATION DETERMINED THAT FALSE NEGATIVE VITROS ANTI-HIV 1 & 2 (AHIV1+2) RESULTS WERE OBTAINED FROM TWO DIFFERENT LOTS OF VITROS AHIV1+2 REAGENT WHEN TESTING USING A NON-VITROS BIORAD QUALITY CONTROL (QC) FLUID ON TWO DIFFERENT VITROS 5600 INTEGRATED SYSTEMS. VITROS ANTI-HIV 1 & 2 LOT 1110: VIROTROL I: VITROS AHIV1+2 ON INST J1 OF 0.58, 0.60, 0.57, 0.62, 0.60, 0.58, 0.61, 0.58, 0.57 AND 0.57 S/C (NEGATIVE) VERSUS THE EXPECTED RESULT OF REACTIVE (>/=1.00) VIROTROL I: VITROS AHIV1+2 ON INST J2 OF 0.42, 0.44, 0.53, 0.15, 0.15, 0.15, 0.57 AND 0.31 S/C (NEGATIVE) VERSUS THE EXPECTED RESULT OF REACTIVE (>/=1.00) VITROS ANTI-HIV 1 & 2 LOT 1100: VIROTROL II: VITROS AHIV1+2 ON INST J2 OF 0.44, 0.43 AND 0.44 S/C (NEGATIVE) VERSUS THE EXPECTED RESULT OF REACTIVE (>/=1.00) BIASED RESULTS OF THE MAGNITUDE AND DIRECTION OBSERVED MAY LEAD TO INAPPROPRIATE PHYSICIAN ACTION IF THEY WERE TO OCCUR UNDETECTED. THE FALSE NEGATIVE RESULTS OCCURRED ONLY OF QUALITY CONTROL FLUIDS. THE CUSTOMER PROCESSED PATIENT TESTING USING VITROS HIV1+2 LOT 1100 AND THERE WAS NO ALLEGATION OF PATIENT HARM. THE CUSTOMER DID NOT USE THE VITROS HIV1+2 LOT 1110 REAGENT LOT TO RUN PATIENT SAMPLES BECAUSE OF THE ISSUE

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17451555 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 3, 2023False Negative Result; False Negative Result

    THE INVESTIGATION DETERMINED THAT FALSE NEGATIVE VITROS ANTI-HIV 1 & 2 (AHIV1+2) RESULTS WERE OBTAINED FROM TWO DIFFERENT LOTS OF VITROS AHIV1+2 REAGENT WHEN TESTING USING A NON-VITROS BIORAD QUALITY CONTROL (QC) FLUID ON TWO DIFFERENT VITROS 5600 INTEGRATED SYSTEMS. VITROS ANTI-HIV 1 & 2 LOT 1110: VIROTROL I: VITROS AHIV1+2 ON INST J1 OF 0.58, 0.60, 0.57, 0.62, 0.60, 0.58, 0.61, 0.58, 0.57 AND 0.57 S/C (NEGATIVE) VERSUS THE EXPECTED RESULT OF REACTIVE (>/=1.00) VIROTROL I: VITROS AHIV1+2 ON INST J2 OF 0.42, 0.44, 0.53, 0.15, 0.15, 0.15, 0.57 AND 0.31 S/C (NEGATIVE) VERSUS THE EXPECTED RESULT OF REACTIVE (>/=1.00) VITROS ANTI-HIV 1 & 2 LOT 1100: VIROTROL II: VITROS AHIV1+2 ON INST J2 OF 0.44, 0.43 AND 0.44 S/C (NEGATIVE) VERSUS THE EXPECTED RESULT OF REACTIVE (>/=1.00) BIASED RESULTS OF THE MAGNITUDE AND DIRECTION OBSERVED MAY LEAD TO INAPPROPRIATE PHYSICIAN ACTION IF THEY WERE TO OCCUR UNDETECTED. THE FALSE NEGATIVE RESULTS OCCURRED ONLY OF QUALITY CONTROL FLUIDS. THE CUSTOMER PROCESSED PATIENT TESTING USING VITROS HIV1+2 LOT 1100 AND THERE WAS NO ALLEGATION OF PATIENT HARM. THE CUSTOMER DID NOT USE THE VITROS HIV1+2 LOT 1110 REAGENT LOT TO RUN PATIENT SAMPLES BECAUSE OF THE ISSUE

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17451497 ↗

Other Test, hiv detection devices

All Test, hiv detection devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page