Bard® Fluoro-4™ Silicone Ureteral Stent 233626Recalls & reported problems
C. R. Bard, Inc. · Bard® Fluoro-4™ Silicone Ureteral Stent with Hydro-Glide™ Guidewire · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Bard Fluoro-4 Silicone Ureteral Stent (5)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 9
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 9 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10801741011686), received between May 10, 2017 and Aug 15, 2022 — classified as 1 injury, 8 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Fragmentation” (4 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Material Fragmentation4
- Break3
- Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem1
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Calcified1
- Split1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions5
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient2
- Hematuria1
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
- No Patient Involvement1
- Unspecified Kidney or Urinary Problem1
- Urinary Tract Infection1
Recent adverse event reports
The 9 most recent of 9 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionAug 15, 2022Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE DOUBLE J URETERAL STENT WAS BROKEN INSIDE THE PATIENT¿S URETER DURING USE. AND STATED THAT THE PATIENT WAS SAFE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15225756 ↗MalfunctionJul 29, 2022Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE STENT WAS BROKEN IN THE PATIENT DURING THE USE AND THE PATIENT WAS SAFE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15135717 ↗MalfunctionApr 8, 2022Calcified; Calcified
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE USER EXPERIENCED URGENCY, DYSURIA, FLANK PAIN, SUPRAPUBIC PAIN, INCONTINENCE, HEMATURIA, URINARY TRACT INFECTION, IRRITATIVE URINARY SYMPTOMS AND STENT ENCRUSTATION WHILE USING THE URETERAL STENT. NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION WAS REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 14052621 ↗InjuryApr 6, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE USER EXPERIENCED URGENCY, DYSURIA, FLANK PAIN, SUPRAPUBIC PAIN, INCONTINENCE, HEMATURIA, URINARY TRACT INFECTION, IRRITATIVE URINARY SYMPTOMS AND STENT ENCRUSTATION WHILE USING URETERAL STENT. IT WAS UNKNOWN WHAT MEDICAL INTERVENTION WAS PROVIDED FOR THE URGENCY, DYSURIA, FLANK PAIN, SUPRAPUBIC PAIN, INCONTINENCE, HEMATURIA, URINARY TRACT INFECTION AND IRRITATIVE URINARY SYMPTOMS.
Patient problems: Hematuria; Unspecified Kidney or Urinary Problem; Urinary Tract Infection
MAUDE report 14021951 ↗MalfunctionJul 9, 2021Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE FRONT TIP OF THE STENT WAS FOUND BROKEN. CUSTOMER USED ANOTHER NEW D-J.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12142484 ↗MalfunctionJun 22, 2021Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE FRONT TIP OF THE STENT WAS FOUND TO BE BROKEN. THEY STATED THAT ANOTHER NEW D-J WAS USED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12045824 ↗MalfunctionJul 22, 2019Break; Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE STENT COULD NOT BE PLACED SMOOTHLY, THE END TIP OF THE DEVICE WAS SUSPECTED TO BE BROKEN.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8812999 ↗MalfunctionAug 8, 2017Break; Split
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PIGTAIL WAS SPLIT/BROKEN.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 6775761 ↗MalfunctionMay 10, 2017Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE WAS A SPLIT IN THE DEVICE.
Patient problems: No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 6556848 ↗
Other STENT, URETERAL devices
- Bard® InLay Optima® Ureteral Stent 788426C. R. Bard, Inc. · STENT, URETERAL1 recall100 reports
- Bard® InLay Optima® Ureteral Stent 788626C. R. Bard, Inc. · STENT, URETERAL122 reports
- Bard® InLay® Ureteral Stent with HydroGlide™ Guidewire 777626C. R. Bard, Inc. · STENT, URETERAL118 reports
- Bard® InLay® Ureteral Stent with HydroGlide™ Guidewire 777426C. R. Bard, Inc. · STENT, URETERAL108 reports
- Bard® InLay® Ureteral Stent 778626C. R. Bard, Inc. · STENT, URETERAL100 reports
- Percuflex™ Plus M0061752530Boston Scientific Corporation · STENT, URETERAL1 death99 reports
- Contour VL™ M0061801560Boston Scientific Corporation · STENT, URETERAL1 recall45 reports
- Polaris™ Ultra M0061921330Boston Scientific Corporation · STENT, URETERAL71 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page