Skip to content

Bard® Fluoro-4™ Silicone Ureteral Stent 233626Recalls & reported problems

C. R. Bard, Inc. · Bard® Fluoro-4™ Silicone Ureteral Stent with Hydro-Glide™ Guidewire · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Bard Fluoro-4 Silicone Ureteral Stent (5)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
9
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 9 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10801741011686), received between May 10, 2017 and Aug 15, 2022 — classified as 1 injury, 8 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Fragmentation” (4 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Material Fragmentation4
  • Break3
  • Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem1
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Calcified1
  • Split1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions5
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient2
  • Hematuria1
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
  • No Patient Involvement1
  • Unspecified Kidney or Urinary Problem1
  • Urinary Tract Infection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 9 most recent of 9 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionAug 15, 2022Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE DOUBLE J URETERAL STENT WAS BROKEN INSIDE THE PATIENT¿S URETER DURING USE. AND STATED THAT THE PATIENT WAS SAFE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15225756 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 29, 2022Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE STENT WAS BROKEN IN THE PATIENT DURING THE USE AND THE PATIENT WAS SAFE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15135717 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 8, 2022Calcified; Calcified

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE USER EXPERIENCED URGENCY, DYSURIA, FLANK PAIN, SUPRAPUBIC PAIN, INCONTINENCE, HEMATURIA, URINARY TRACT INFECTION, IRRITATIVE URINARY SYMPTOMS AND STENT ENCRUSTATION WHILE USING THE URETERAL STENT. NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION WAS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 14052621 ↗
  • InjuryApr 6, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE USER EXPERIENCED URGENCY, DYSURIA, FLANK PAIN, SUPRAPUBIC PAIN, INCONTINENCE, HEMATURIA, URINARY TRACT INFECTION, IRRITATIVE URINARY SYMPTOMS AND STENT ENCRUSTATION WHILE USING URETERAL STENT. IT WAS UNKNOWN WHAT MEDICAL INTERVENTION WAS PROVIDED FOR THE URGENCY, DYSURIA, FLANK PAIN, SUPRAPUBIC PAIN, INCONTINENCE, HEMATURIA, URINARY TRACT INFECTION AND IRRITATIVE URINARY SYMPTOMS.

    Patient problems: Hematuria; Unspecified Kidney or Urinary Problem; Urinary Tract Infection

    MAUDE report 14021951 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 9, 2021Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE FRONT TIP OF THE STENT WAS FOUND BROKEN. CUSTOMER USED ANOTHER NEW D-J.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12142484 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 22, 2021Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE FRONT TIP OF THE STENT WAS FOUND TO BE BROKEN. THEY STATED THAT ANOTHER NEW D-J WAS USED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12045824 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 22, 2019Break; Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE STENT COULD NOT BE PLACED SMOOTHLY, THE END TIP OF THE DEVICE WAS SUSPECTED TO BE BROKEN.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 8812999 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 8, 2017Break; Split

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PIGTAIL WAS SPLIT/BROKEN.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 6775761 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 10, 2017Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE WAS A SPLIT IN THE DEVICE.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 6556848 ↗

Other STENT, URETERAL devices

All STENT, URETERAL devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page