Skip to content

Bard® InLay® Ureteral Stent with HydroGlide™ Guidewire 777724Recalls & reported problems

C. R. Bard, Inc. · INLAY URETERAL STENT W/HYDROGLIDE GUIDEWIRE · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Bard InLay Ureteral Stent with HydroGlide Guidewire (17)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10801741014618), received between Feb 13, 2018 and Jul 12, 2024 — classified as 6 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 1 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break2
  • Material Fragmentation2
  • Component Misassembled1
  • Component Missing1
  • Device Damaged Prior to Use1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
  • No Patient Involvement2
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJul 12, 2024Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE DJ TUBE OF THE URETERAL STENT WAS BROKEN BEFORE USE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19729051 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 6, 2022Component Misassembled; Component Misassembled

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SUTURE WAS NOT ATTACHED TO THE STENT WHEN NURSE OPENED THE PACKAGE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 14020843 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 30, 2021Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE URETERAL STENT WAS BROKEN THE COIL SEPARATING FROM THE STRAIGHT SITE UPON OPENING THE PACKAGE. IT WAS MENTIONED THAT A NEW URETERAL STENT HAD BEEN UNPACKED FOR USE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 13120941 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 12, 2021Component Missing; Component Missing

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT AFTER OPENING THE PACKAGE, THE GUIDE WIRE WAS FOUND BUT NO STENT WAS FOUND INSIDE THE PACKAGE. A NEW ONE HAD BEEN UNPACKED TO USE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 11815890 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 27, 2018Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE STENT WAS FOUND BROKEN PRIOR TO USE.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient; No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 7300486 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 13, 2018Break; Device Damaged Prior to Use

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE DEVICE BROKEN PRIOR TO USE.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 7267120 ↗

Other STENT, URETERAL devices

All STENT, URETERAL devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page