Bard® InLay Optima® Ureteral Stent with NiCore™ Guidewire 786426Recalls & reported problems
C. R. Bard, Inc. · INLAY OPTIMA URETERAL STENT W/NITINOL GUIDEWIRE · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Bard InLay Optima Ureteral Stent with NiCore Guidewire (8)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
Quick summary
This Bard Inlay Optima ureteral stent is a thin tube placed in the ureter to keep urine draining, supplied with a nitinol guidewire. The 36 reports mostly describe the stent breaking or crumbling, packaging and labeling mismatches (wrong size stent or push tube in the box, or a label covering it), and stents becoming blocked or encrusted with calcium deposits after sitting in place. There are no deaths and one injury. No recalls name this device.
AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.
- Adverse event reports
- 36
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 36 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10801741015042), received between Jun 9, 2017 and May 7, 2026 — classified as 1 injury, 35 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Fragmentation” (17 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Material Fragmentation17
- Wrong Label7
- Calcified5
- Difficult to Insert3
- Inadequate Instructions for Healthcare Professional3
- Partial Blockage2
- Accessory Incompatible1
- Biocompatibility1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions31
- Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available4
- Calcium Deposits/Calcification1
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
- Swelling/ Edema1
Recent adverse event reports
The 25 most recent of 36 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMay 7, 2026Calcified; Material Fragmentation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE STENT WAS LEFT IN PLACE FOR TWO MONTHS AND BECAME COMPLETELY ENCRUSTED WITH CALCULI.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25113489 ↗MalfunctionDec 26, 2024Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE URETERAL STENT NEEDS TO BE PLACED ON THE PATIENT AFTER URETEROSCOPIC LITHOTOMY IN ORDER TO ELIMINATE THE OBSTRUCTION CAUSED BY VARIOUS BENIGN, MALIGNANT AND POST-TRAUMATIC CONDITIONS IN THE URETER. WHEN THE DOCTOR WAS PREPARED TO INSERT THE URETERAL STENT DURING THE OPERATION, THE STENT ITSELF WAS BLOCKED BY THE LABEL ON THE PACKAGE AND CANNOT BE SEEN AT ALL, AFTER THAT THE ITINERANT NURSE OPENED THE BAG, IT WAS FOUND THAT THE STENT SHAFT WAS BROKEN, AND THE SILK THREAD WAS ENTANGLED WITH THE STENT, SO THE PRODUCT CANNOT BE USED, RESULTING IN THE PROLONGATION OF THE OPERATION TIME. IN ORDER TO ENSURE THE COMPLETION OF THE OPERATION, THE SURGEON ASKED TO REOPEN AND PREPARE 2-3 SETS OF THE PRODUCT IN ADVANCE AND THEN PLACE IT, AND THE FOLLOW-UP OPERATION OF THE PATIENT WENT SMOOTHLY AND GRADUALLY RECOVERED.
Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available
MAUDE report 21018299 ↗MalfunctionJan 10, 2024Wrong Label; Wrong Label
IT WAS REPORTED THAT WHEN THE USER OPENED THE 786426 BRACKET PACKAGE, THEY FOUND THAT IT WAS A 6F BRACKET INSIDE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18484109 ↗MalfunctionNov 9, 2023Wrong Label; Wrong Label
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CUSTOMER OPENED THE PACKAGE DURING THE OPERATION AND FOUND THAT THE STENT CATHETER WAS 426 MODEL, BUT THE PUSH TUBE WAS 626, WHICH COULD NOT BE MATCHED FOR NORMAL USE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18099931 ↗MalfunctionOct 27, 2023Wrong Label; Wrong Label
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE 6FR BRACKET WAS INCLUDED IN THE 786426 (4.5FR * 26CM) BRACKET SETS. THERE WERE 15 UNOPENED SETS IN TOTAL.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18021570 ↗MalfunctionOct 20, 2023Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CUSTOMER FOUND THE URETERAL STENT DEFECTIVE DURING THE PROCEDURE. PER FOLLOW UP INFORMATION RECEIVED ON 05OCT2023, ACCORDING TO THE OPERATING THEATRE, PULLING THE CORD ALSO BROKE THE STENT. THE EVENT OCCURRED BEFORE THE STENT WAS INSERTED INTO THE PATIENT. A 2ND STENT HAS SINCE BEEN BROKEN IN A SIMILAR MANNER, A STENT WITH THE SAME LOT NUMBER.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17981586 ↗MalfunctionOct 10, 2023Partial Blockage; Partial Blockage
IT WAS REPORTED THAT WHEN IN USE DURING OPERATION, THE STENT WAS FOUND OCCLUDED SO THAT THE URINE COULD NOT BE DRAINED. AS PER THE FOLLOW UP INFORMATION RECEIVED VIA IBC ON 20SEP2023, THE URETERAL STENT WAS USED FOR LAPAROSCOPIC RIGHT URETERAL BLADDER REPLANTATION AND WAS REPLACED WITH A NEW STENT WHEN THE STENT WAS FOUND TO BE BLOCKED DURING INTRAOPERATIVE USE AND URINE COULD NOT BE DRAINED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17903904 ↗MalfunctionSep 19, 2023Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE URETERAL STENT FRACTURED WHEN IT WAS REMOVED FROM PIGTAIL MODULATOR AFTER UNPACKING.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17774098 ↗MalfunctionAug 2, 2023Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE TIP OF THE URETERAL STENT WAS BROKEN.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17441901 ↗MalfunctionJul 31, 2023Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE URETERAL STENT TUBING WAS FOUND TO BE RUPTURED UPON UNPACKING.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17423843 ↗MalfunctionJul 28, 2023Material Fragmentation; Material Twisted/Bent; Material Fragmentation; Material Twisted/Bent
IT WAS REPORTED THAT WHEN THE URETERAL STENT WAS BEING REMOVED FROM THE PIGTAIL MODULATOR AFTER OPENING THE PACKAGE, BREAKAGE OCCURRED WITH THE STENT. IT WAS STATED THAT THE ADDITIONALLY, EVIDENT SIGNS OF CREASE WERE FOUND AT THE STENT TUBING PIGTAIL END.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17413083 ↗MalfunctionJul 26, 2023Wrong Label; Wrong Label
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE WERE FIVE PRODUCTS OF 786426 THAT 6 FR STENTS WAS CONTAINED IN. AS PER THE FOLLOW UP INFORMATION RECEIVED ON 14JUL2023, CLARIFIED THAT IT WAS A WRONG PRODUCT IN THE PACKAGE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17396038 ↗MalfunctionJul 18, 2023Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT AFTER OPENING THE PACKAGE, THE URETERAL STENT TUBING WAS RUPTURED WHEN THE PIGTAIL STRAIGHTENER WAS USED TO STRAIGHTEN THE STENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17342154 ↗MalfunctionJul 18, 2023Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT AFTER OPENING THE PACKAGE, THE URETERAL STENT TUBING WAS RUPTURED WHEN THE PIGTAIL STRAIGHTENER WAS USED TO STRAIGHTEN THE STENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17341913 ↗MalfunctionJul 5, 2023Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT UPON OPENING OF THE PACKAGE, THE STENT TUBING WAS FOUND RUPTURED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17256377 ↗MalfunctionApr 13, 2023Inadequate Instructions for Healthcare Professional; Wrong Label; Inadequate Instructions for Healthcare Professional; Wrong Label
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PACKAGE OF 786426 URETERAL STENT WAS NOT OPENED. THE SIZE OF THE STENT INSIDE WAS 6FR. THERE WERE A TOTAL OF 6 STENTS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16731621 ↗MalfunctionMar 31, 2023Inadequate Instructions for Healthcare Professional; Wrong Label; Inadequate Instructions for Healthcare Professional; Wrong Label
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE WAS A URETERAL STENT OF FRENCH SIZE SIX INSIDE THE KIT UPON OPENING. PER ADDITIONAL INFORMATION VIA EMAIL FROM IBC ON 29MAR2022, IT WAS STATED THAT EACH HOSPITAL RECEIVED ONE PRODUCT. THE SAMPLES RECEIVED HAD ENGRAVED 6FR ON THE STENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16655228 ↗MalfunctionMar 31, 2023Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE URETERAL STENT WAS FOUND TO BE RUPTURED UPON OPENING THE KIT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16655116 ↗MalfunctionMar 31, 2023Inadequate Instructions for Healthcare Professional; Wrong Label; Inadequate Instructions for Healthcare Professional; Wrong Label
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE WAS A URETERAL STENT OF FRENCH SIZE SIX INSIDE THE KIT UPON OPENING. PER ADDITIONAL INFORMATION VIA EMAIL FROM IBC ON (B)(6) 2022, IT WAS STATED THAT THE EACH HOSPITAL RECEIVED ONE PRODUCT. IT WAS ALSO STATED THAT THE SAMPLES RECEIVED HAD ENGRAVED 6FR ON THE STENT. THE SEQUENCE NUMBER PRINTED ON THE UNIT LABEL OF THE POUCH LIKE THE ONE (02137) ON THE FOUR COMPLAINTS LIKE 02292. THE FRENCH SIZE ON THE STENT INSIDE THE POUCH WITH LABEL NUMBER 02137 COULD NOT BE NOT DETERMINED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16655114 ↗MalfunctionMar 29, 2023Difficult to Insert; Difficult to Insert
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE WERE 3 URETERAL STENTS HAD THE SAME ISSUE IN THE SAME OPERATION. AFTER OPENING THE PACKAGE, THE STENT COULD NOT BE ADVANCED. IT WAS MENTIONED THAT THERE WERE NO OTHER COMPLICATIONS. AS PER FOLLOW UP INFORMATION RECEIVED VIA IBC ON (B)(6) 2022, IT WAS STATED THAT ALL THREE STENTS WERE BELONGING TO THE SAME LOT. AS PER NOTIFICATION RECEIVED FROM INVESTIGATOR ON (B)(6) 2023, IT WAS STATED THAT THE USER RETURNED THREE USED SAMPLES. IT WAS STATED THAT WHEN THE SAMPLES WERE EVALUATED BY THE SUPPLIER, THEY WERE CONFIRMED TO HAVE BEEN USED. IT WAS ALSO STATED THAT ONE OF THE STENTS WAS OBSERVED TO BE BROKEN.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16635217 ↗MalfunctionMar 29, 2023Difficult to Insert; Difficult to Insert
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE WERE 3 URETERAL STENTS HAD THE SAME ISSUE IN THE SAME OPERATION. AFTER OPENING THE PACKAGE, THE STENT COULD NOT BE ADVANCED. IT WAS MENTIONED THAT THERE WERE NO OTHER COMPLICATIONS. PER FOLLOW UP INFORMATION RECEIVED VIA IBC ON 02NOV2022, IT WAS STATED THAT ALL THREE STENTS WERE BELONGING TO THE SAME LOT. PER NOTIFICATION RECEIVED FROM INVESTIGATOR ON 07MAR2023, IT WAS STATED THAT THE USER RETURNED THREE USED SAMPLES. IT WAS STATED THAT WHEN THE SAMPLES WERE EVALUATED BY THE SUPPLIER, THEY WERE CONFIRMED TO HAVE BEEN USED. IT WAS ALSO STATED THAT ONE OF THE STENTS WAS OBSERVED TO BE BROKEN.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16635107 ↗MalfunctionNov 10, 2022Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT 15 DAYS AFTER THE PATIENT'S URETERAL STENT IMPLANTATION, THE URETERAL STENT WAS FOUND TO BE BROKEN DURING URETERAL STENT REMOVAL UNDER LOCAL ANESTHESIA IN THE HOSPITAL.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15770355 ↗MalfunctionNov 6, 2022Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE URETERAL STENT WAS FOUND TO BE RUPTURED UPON OPENING THE PACKAGE. IT WAS MENTIONED THAT FOUR QUANTITIES WERE AFFECTED. PER FOLLOW UP INFORMATION RECEIVED VIA IBC ON 02NOV2022, IT WAS STATED THAT ONLY ONE STENT WAS AFFECTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15741326 ↗MalfunctionNov 6, 2022Difficult to Insert; Difficult to Insert
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE WERE 3 URETERAL STENTS HAD THE SAME ISSUE IN THE SAME OPERATION. AFTER OPENING THE PACKAGE, THE STENT COULD NOT BE ADVANCED. IT WAS MENTIONED THAT THERE WERE NO OTHER COMPLICATIONS. PER FOLLOW UP INFORMATION RECEIVED VIA IBC ON 02NOV2022, IT WAS STATED THAT ALL THREE STENTS WERE BELONGING TO THE SAME LOT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15741322 ↗MalfunctionSep 16, 2022Calcified; Calcified
IT WAS REPORTED THAT PLENTY OF CALCULI WERE OBSERVED TWO WEEKS AFTER THE URETERAL STENT WAS PLACED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15437816 ↗
Other STENT, URETERAL devices
- Bard® InLay Optima® Ureteral Stent 788426C. R. Bard, Inc. · STENT, URETERAL1 recall100 reports
- Bard® InLay Optima® Ureteral Stent 788626C. R. Bard, Inc. · STENT, URETERAL122 reports
- Bard® InLay® Ureteral Stent with HydroGlide™ Guidewire 777626C. R. Bard, Inc. · STENT, URETERAL118 reports
- Bard® InLay® Ureteral Stent with HydroGlide™ Guidewire 777426C. R. Bard, Inc. · STENT, URETERAL108 reports
- Bard® InLay® Ureteral Stent 778626C. R. Bard, Inc. · STENT, URETERAL100 reports
- Percuflex™ Plus M0061752530Boston Scientific Corporation · STENT, URETERAL1 death99 reports
- Contour VL™ M0061801560Boston Scientific Corporation · STENT, URETERAL1 recall45 reports
- Polaris™ Ultra M0061921330Boston Scientific Corporation · STENT, URETERAL71 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page