Bard® X-Force® Balloon Dilation Catheter 998506Recalls & reported problems
C. R. Bard, Inc. · Bard® X-Force® Balloon Dilation Catheter · Class 2
All models of Bard X-Force Balloon Dilation Catheter (22)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 15
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 15 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10801741052689), received between May 1, 2017 and Feb 27, 2024 — classified as 15 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fluid/Blood Leak” (4 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Fluid/Blood Leak4
- Inflation Problem4
- Break3
- Burst Container or Vessel3
- Device Handling Problem2
- Use of Device Problem2
- Component Misassembled1
- Material Fragmentation1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions7
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient7
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient6
- No Information1
- No Patient Involvement1
Recent adverse event reports
The 15 most recent of 15 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionFeb 27, 2024Burst Container or Vessel; Burst Container or Vessel
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THEY INFLATED THE BALLOON DILATION CATHETER TO A CERTAIN AMOUNT, BUT IT BURST. ON VISUAL INSPECTION, THE BALLOON PART WAS WRINKLED AND CRUSHED, SO THEY COULD NOT CONFIRM THE DAMAGE. METER PART OF MAIN BODY. THE BASE WAS CRACKED AND CAME OFF.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18787742 ↗MalfunctionDec 13, 2022Inflation Problem; Component Misassembled; Inflation Problem; Component Misassembled
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE INFLATION DEVICE OF THE BALLOON DILATION CATHETER THAT HAD BEEN LOANED TO THE HOSPITAL ON A SHORT-TERM DID NOT WORK PROPERLY. ANOTHER DEVICE OF THE SAME PRODUCT CATALOG NUMBER THAT HAD BEEN PREPARED AS A BACKUP WAS USED AND THE PROCEDURE WAS CONTINUED. PER FOLLOW-UP INFORMATION RECEIVED VIA IBC ON 16DEC2022, STATED THAT PATIENT HAD DIFFICULTY IN INFLATING.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15968753 ↗MalfunctionJun 24, 2022Fluid/Blood Leak; Fluid/Blood Leak
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE OPERATION, THE CONTRAST MEDIUM LEAKED FROM THE HANDLE OF THE BARD X-FORCE URETERAL BALLOON CATHETER, SO THE USER REFRAINED FROM USING IT. IT SEEMED TO BE HAPPENED IMMEDIATELY AFTER USE. PER FOLLOW UP INFORMATION RECEIVED VIA IBC ON 08JUN2022, STATED THAT IT WAS UNKNOWN WHICH PART OF THE FOLEY CATHETER WAS REFERRED TO AS HANDLE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 14799338 ↗MalfunctionJan 5, 2022Fluid/Blood Leak; Fluid/Blood Leak
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE INFLATION DEVICE OF THE BALLOON DILATION CATHETER WAS BROKEN AT THE BEGINNING OF USE. THE USER STATED THAT THE INFLATION DEVICE GAVE A STRANGE FEELING AND REFRAINED FROM USING IT. THE PATIENT USED THE NEW BALLOON DILATION CATHETER, AS THE USER HAD TWO BOTTLES READY TO GO. THE NEW BALLOON DILATION CATHETER WAS ADDED TO THE PATIENT ON (B)(6) 2021. ONLY THE INFLATION DEVICE WAS COLLECTED. THE METER DID NOT GO UP WHEN THE USER OPERATED IT, AND WATER STARTED LEAKING WHEN PRESSURE WAS APPLIED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13168370 ↗MalfunctionJan 4, 2022Material Fragmentation; Device Handling Problem; Material Fragmentation; Device Handling Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE INFLATION DEVICE OF THE BALLOON DILATION CATHETER WAS BROKEN AT THE BEGINNING OF USE. THE USER STATED THAT THE INFLATION DEVICE GAVE A STRANGE FEELING AND REFRAINED FROM USING IT. THE PATIENT USED THE NEW BALLOON DILATION CATHETER, AS THE USER HAD TWO BOTTLES READY TO GO. THE NEW BALLOON DILATION CATHETER WAS ADDED TO THE PATIENT ON DECEMBER 22ND. ONLY THE INFLATION DEVICE WAS COLLECTED. THE METER DID NOT GO UP WHEN THE USER OPERATED IT, AND WATER STARTED LEAKING WHEN PRESSURE WAS APPLIED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13157035 ↗MalfunctionOct 28, 2021Fluid/Blood Leak; Device Handling Problem; Fluid/Blood Leak; Device Handling Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT AFTER INSERTING THE DILATION CATHETER, THE CONTRAST MEDIUM WAS INJECTED BY MANUAL PUSHING. ALSO, IT WAS STATED THAT WHEN THE PRESSURE WAS APPLIED BY TURNING THE INFLATION DEVICE IT WAS LOCKED, THE CONTRAST MEDIUM LEAKED FROM THE AREA BETWEEN THE PRESSURE GAUGE OF THE INFLATION DEVICE AND THE SYRINGE. PRESSURE WAS NOT APPLIED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12714649 ↗MalfunctionSep 9, 2020Partial Blockage; Material Rupture; Partial Blockage
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PRESSURE SUDDENLY DROPPED FROM THE CATHETER DUE TO THE BALLOON BURST. PER ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED VIA EMAIL FROM THE IBC ON 21AUG2020, IT WAS UNKNOWN WHETHER THE BALLOON BURST OCCURRED AND PER NOTIFICATION RECEIVED VIA INVESTIGATOR ON 01JAN2021, BASED ON THE SUPPLIER EVALUATION IT WAS FOUND THAT THE REPORTED EVENT ALIGNS MORE TO A INFLATION ISSUE DUE TO A DRIED CONTRAST MEDIUM.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions; No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 10512312 ↗MalfunctionDec 3, 2019Use of Device Problem; Break; Use of Device Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE DILATATION CATHETER WAS FOUND TO HAVE A DAMAGED BALLOON UPON REMOVAL OF THE CATHETER. THE USER NOTED THE METER DID NOT GO UP AS USUAL WHEN THE EXPANSION FLUID WAS INJECTED INTO THE DEVICE, AND THUS REMOVED THE CATHETER TO FIND A BURST BALLOON.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 9403462 ↗MalfunctionDec 3, 2019Use of Device Problem; Burst Container or Vessel; Use of Device Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE DILATATION CATHETER WAS FOUND TO HAVE A DAMAGED BALLOON UPON REMOVAL OF THE CATHETER. THE USER NOTED THE METER DID NOT GO UP AS USUAL WHEN THE EXPANSION FLUID WAS INJECTED INTO THE DEVICE, AND THUS REMOVED THE CATHETER TO FIND A BURST BALLOON.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 9403273 ↗MalfunctionSep 16, 2019Break; Burst Container or Vessel; Burst Container or Vessel
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE DILATATION CATHETER WAS FOUND TO HAVE A DAMAGED BALLOON UPON REMOVAL OF THE CATHETER. THE USER NOTED THAT THE METER DID NOT GO UP AS USUAL WHEN THE EXPANSION FLUID WAS INJECTED INTO THE DEVICE, AND THUS REMOVED THE CATHETER AND FOUND A BURST BALLOON.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 9072617 ↗MalfunctionMar 20, 2019Inflation Problem; Pressure Problem; Inflation Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PRESSURE WAS UNABLE TO RISE FROM 6 ATM WITH AN INFLATION DEVICE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8438036 ↗MalfunctionSep 27, 2018Break; Inflation Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE INFLATION DEVICE ON THE URETERAL CATHETER WAS BROKEN PRIOR TO USE.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient; No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 7913917 ↗MalfunctionSep 19, 2018Positioning Problem; Physical Resistance/Sticking; Physical Resistance/Sticking
IT WAS REPORTED THAT IT WAS DIFFICULT TO MOVE THE METER DURING USE. IT WAS LATER REPORTED FROM THE IBC VIA EMAIL ON SEPTEMBER 4TH, 2018 THAT THE NEEDLE OF THE INFLATION DEVICE WAS NOT MOVING WHEN THE USER TRIED TO MOVE THE INFLATION VALVE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7890182 ↗MalfunctionAug 22, 2017Inflation Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE BALLOON WAS UNABLE TO BE INFLATED WHILE IN THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Information
MAUDE report 6811733 ↗MalfunctionMay 1, 2017Fluid/Blood Leak
IT WAS REPORTED THAT FLUID LEAKED OUT OF THE BALLOON WHEN ATTEMPTING TO INFLATE THE DEVICE. ANOTHER DEVICE OF THE SAME TYPE WAS USED FOR THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 6533817 ↗
Other DILATOR, CATHETER, URETERAL devices
- Porges Coloplast RBD014Coloplast A/S · DILATOR, CATHETER, URETERAL1 recall0 reports
- Bard® X-Force® Balloon Dilation Catheter 998706C. R. Bard, Inc. · DILATOR, CATHETER, URETERAL38 reports
- Bard® X-Force® Balloon Dilation Catheter 998606C. R. Bard, Inc. · DILATOR, CATHETER, URETERAL27 reports
- Bard® X-Force® Balloon Dilation Catheter 998006C. R. Bard, Inc. · DILATOR, CATHETER, URETERAL25 reports
- Bard® X-Force® Balloon Dilation Catheter 998806C. R. Bard, Inc. · DILATOR, CATHETER, URETERAL23 reports
- Bard® X-Force® Balloon Dilation Catheter 998504C. R. Bard, Inc. · DILATOR, CATHETER, URETERAL16 reports
- Bard® X-Force® Balloon Dilation Catheter 998004C. R. Bard, Inc. · DILATOR, CATHETER, URETERAL15 reports
- Passport M0062181100Boston Scientific Corporation · DILATOR, CATHETER, URETERAL15 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page