Skip to content

ARROW IPN920649Recalls & reported problems

Teleflex Incorporated · ARROW ENDURANCE(TM) Extended Dwell Peripheral Catheter System · Class 2

All models of ARROW (1494)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
1

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 10801902196382), received between Apr 7, 2023 and Apr 7, 2023 — classified as 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Separation” (1 report).

1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Recalls naming this device

  1. May 19, 2023Open, Classified

    Potential for catheter separation or leakage

    Z-1826-2023 · Root cause: Under Investigation by firm · Recall details · FDA record ↗

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Material Separation1

Patient problems

  • Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionApr 7, 2023Material Separation; Material Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT "WHEN THEY WERE PUTTING THE DWELL IN THE END PIECE DETACHED AND GOT STUCK IN PATIENTS' TISSUE AS THEY GAINED ACCESS AND WERE PULLING NEEDLE OUT. UPDATE, ON 3/14, THEY DID NOT SAVE THE LOT NUMBER, BUT THEY HAVE THE PRODUCT IN BIOHAZARD BAG TO SEND BACK, THE USER STATED AS THEY INSERTED THE DWELL, GOT IN VEIN, BLOOD RETURN, GUIDEWIRE CAME OUT FINE, WHEN THEY PULLED BACK ON NEEDLE THEY NOTICED 3/4 OF THE CATHETER CAME OUT WITH THE NEEDLE AND REALIZED A PIECE OF CATHETER BROKE OFF IN PT. (CATHETER SEPARATED AND IT WAS A CLEAN SHEER PER USER). THEY CALLED IR TO DO A SCAN, THEY SAID THE CATHETER PIECE [WOULD] WORK ITS WAY OUT OF VESSEL AND IS JUST IN TISSUE RIGHT UNDER SKIN SO NO SURGICAL INTERVENTION WAS NEEDED THEY WILL WAIT AND SEE IF BODY PUSHES IT OUT LIKE A SPLINTER. THEY SAID HIS CONDITION IS THE SAME BEFORE THE DWELL WAS PUT IN SO NO WORSE NO BETTER, THE PATIENT'S DR'S WERE ALREADY IN DISCUSSIONS ABOUT HIM BEING A COMFORT CODE PRIOR TO DWELL GOING IN AS HIS VITALS WERE NOT GOOD PRIOR TO INSERTION. PER USER THE IR DOCTOR SAID IT WILL NOT AFFECT HIS STATE THEY ARE JUST GOING TO SEE IF IT WILL WORK ITS WAY OUT OF THE TISSUE THEY ARE CONTINUING TO MONITOR. THE CU

    Patient problems: Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque

    MAUDE report 16700809 ↗

Other Catheter, intravascular, therapeutic, short-term less than 30 days devices

All Catheter, intravascular, therapeutic, short-term less than 30 days devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page