CORFLO Enteral Feeding Tube 42-9366Recalls & reported problems

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10815149020669), received between Apr 21, 2017 and Aug 14, 2019 — classified as 5 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Crack” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

• MalfunctionAug 14, 2019Break; Obstruction of Flow; Break; Obstruction of Flow

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT "THE TUBE WAS PLACED IN A PEDIATRIC PATIENT ON (B)(6) [2019]. ON (B)(6)[2019], THE TUBE WAS REMOVED AND THE DOCTOR REALIZED THAT ONLY A PART OF THE TUBE WAS REMOVED. AFTER CHECK IT BY RX [RADIOGRAPHY] THEY SAW THAT A PART OF THE TUBE WAS STILL ON JEJUNUM (13 CM APPROX.). A SURGICAL INTERVENTION WAS NEEDED TO REMOVE THE BROKEN PART. BETWEEN (B)(6) [2019] AND (B)(6) [2019], THE TUBE WAS OBTURED [OBSTRUCTED] AND THEY IRRIGATED THE TUBE WITH 5CC OF WATER, BUT THEY DID NOT PERCEIVE THE BROKEN.

  Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

  MAUDE report 8895672 ↗
• MalfunctionOct 1, 2018Break; Break

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT UPON REMOVAL OF THE NASO-JEJUNAL (NJ) TUBE FROM A PATIENT IN PEDIATRIC INTENSIVE CARE, IT WAS NOTICED THAT THE TUBE HAD BROKEN, AND PART OF THE TUBE REMAINED INSIDE THE PATIENT. A PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED TO REMOVE THE BROKEN PIECE OF TUBE, AND TO RE-PASS A NEW NJ TUBE. NO FURTHER INFORMATION PROVIDED.

  Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

  MAUDE report 7923858 ↗
• MalfunctionApr 21, 2017Crack; Crack

  HALYARD RECEIVED A SINGLE REPORT THAT REFERENCED THREE DIFFERENT INCIDENTS, WHICH WERE ASSOCIATED WITH SEPARATE UNITS, INVOLVING THREE DIFFERENT PATIENTS. THIS IS THE THIRD OF THREE REPORTS. REFER TO 3009124963-2017-00014 FOR THE FIRST PATIENT. REFER TO 3009124963-2017-00015 FOR THE SECOND PATIENT. IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT EXPERIENCED AN NJ TUBE THAT DETERIORATED. IT WAS PICKED UP ON X-RAY THAT THE NJ TUBE SPLIT AT THE TOP OF THE TUBE NEAR THE PATIENT'S TRACHEA. THE PATIENT WAS REQUIRED TO GO TO THE OPERATING ROOM TO HAVE THE TUBE REMOVED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED.

  Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

  MAUDE report 6512917 ↗
• MalfunctionApr 21, 2017Crack; Crack

  HALYARD RECEIVED A SINGLE REPORT THAT REFERENCED THREE DIFFERENT INCIDENTS, WHICH WERE ASSOCIATED WITH SEPARATE UNITS, INVOLVING THREE DIFFERENT PATIENTS. THIS IS THE SECOND OF THREE REPORTS. REFER TO 3009124963-2017-00014 FOR THE FIRST PATIENT. REFER TO 3009124963-2017-00016 FOR THE THIRD PATIENT. IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT EXPERIENCED A NJ TUBE THAT DETERIORATED. IT WAS PICKED UP ON X-RAY THAT THE NJ TUBE SPLIT AT THE TOP OF THE TUBE NEAR THE PATIENT'S TRACHEA. THE PATIENT WAS REQUIRED TO GO TO THE OPERATING ROOM TO HAVE THE TUBE REMOVED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED.

  Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

  MAUDE report 6512844 ↗
• MalfunctionApr 21, 2017Crack; Crack

  HALYARD RECEIVED A SINGLE REPORT THAT REFERENCED THREE DIFFERENT INCIDENTS, WHICH WERE ASSOCIATED WITH SEPARATE UNITS, INVOLVING THREE DIFFERENT PATIENTS. THIS IS THE FIRST OF THREE REPORTS. REFER TO 3009124963-2017-00015 FOR THE SECOND PATIENT. REFER TO 3009124963-2017-00016 FOR THE THIRD PATIENT. IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT EXPERIENCED AN NJ TUBE THAT DETERIORATED. IT WAS PICKED UP ON X-RAY THAT THE NJ TUBE SPLIT AT THE TOP OF THE TUBE NEAR THE PATIENT'S TRACHEA. THE PATIENT WAS REQUIRED TO GO TO THE OPERATING ROOM TO HAVE THE TUBE REMOVED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED.

  Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

  MAUDE report 6512719 ↗