CORFLO ULTRA Lite NG Feeding Tube 20-9225Recalls & reported problems

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 10815149023745), received between Oct 27, 2017 and Oct 27, 2017 — classified as 1 injury.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Perforation” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

• InjuryOct 27, 2017Material Perforation; Material Perforation

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT A 5-FRENCH NASODUODENAL (ND) TUBE PLACEMENT WAS ATTEMPTED ON THE PATIENT. A KIDNEYS URETHRA AND BLADDER (KUB) RADIOLOGY EXAM REVEALED THAT THE TUBE WAS IN THE PATIENT'S LUNG AND NOT IN THE ND AREA OF THE GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT. THE TUBE WAS REMOVED. AFTER REMOVAL OF THE TUBE IT WAS NOTED THAT THE STYLET HAD PERFORATED THE TUBE. THE INCIDENT WAS REPORTED TO THE CHARGE NURSE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED 20-OCT-2017 AND STATED THE PACKAGE WAS OPENED AND THE TUBE WAS FLUSHED. THE STYLET WAS EASILY REMOVABLE. THE STYLET WAS NOT REMOVED PRIOR TO INSERTION OF THE DEVICE. THE NASOGASTRIC (NG) TUBE WAS INSERTED. AN X-RAY SHOWED THAT THE TUBE WAS NOT IN THE NG AREA OF THE DIGESTIVE TRACT. THE TUBE WAS REMOVED IN AN EFFORT TO ATTEMPT BETTER PLACEMENT. WHEN THE TUBE WAS COMPLETELY REMOVED, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE STYLET HAD PERFORATED THE NG TUBE. THERE WAS NO HARM REPORTED TO THE PATIENT. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

  Patient problems: No Code Available

  MAUDE report 6984353 ↗